Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility
Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility
We examine the role of overconfidence in news judgment using two large nationally representative survey samples. First, we show that three in four Americans overestimate their relative ability to distinguish between legitimate and false news headlines; respondents place themselves 22 percentiles higher than warranted on average. This overconfidence is, in turn, correlated with consequential differences in real-world beliefs and behavior. We show that overconfident individuals are more likely to visit untrustworthy websites in behavioral data; to fail to successfully distinguish between true and false claims about current events in survey questions; and to report greater willingness to like or share false content on social media, especially when it is politically congenial. In all, these results paint a worrying picture: The individuals who are least equipped to identify false news content are also the least aware of their own limitations and, therefore, more susceptible to believing it and spreading it further.
Lyons, Benjamin A.
4c85428f-bd28-4aa1-b53b-282c9918fea6
Montgomery, Jacob M.
3bf07194-bce8-4eca-8dfb-e559dcb255ba
Guess, Andrew M.
5fcbd18c-f3bc-4a6a-9551-2d460cc66ad0
Nyhan, Brendan
76e1ec80-0af5-432d-9dd6-f7e8237191e4
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
8 June 2021
Lyons, Benjamin A.
4c85428f-bd28-4aa1-b53b-282c9918fea6
Montgomery, Jacob M.
3bf07194-bce8-4eca-8dfb-e559dcb255ba
Guess, Andrew M.
5fcbd18c-f3bc-4a6a-9551-2d460cc66ad0
Nyhan, Brendan
76e1ec80-0af5-432d-9dd6-f7e8237191e4
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Lyons, Benjamin A., Montgomery, Jacob M., Guess, Andrew M., Nyhan, Brendan and Reifler, Jason
(2021)
Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (23), [e2019527118].
(doi:10.1073/pnas.2019527118).
Abstract
We examine the role of overconfidence in news judgment using two large nationally representative survey samples. First, we show that three in four Americans overestimate their relative ability to distinguish between legitimate and false news headlines; respondents place themselves 22 percentiles higher than warranted on average. This overconfidence is, in turn, correlated with consequential differences in real-world beliefs and behavior. We show that overconfident individuals are more likely to visit untrustworthy websites in behavioral data; to fail to successfully distinguish between true and false claims about current events in survey questions; and to report greater willingness to like or share false content on social media, especially when it is politically congenial. In all, these results paint a worrying picture: The individuals who are least equipped to identify false news content are also the least aware of their own limitations and, therefore, more susceptible to believing it and spreading it further.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 May 2021
Published date: 8 June 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 497207
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497207
ISSN: 0027-8424
PURE UUID: 9890fb68-7ef3-48c0-989b-2f864df94cc3
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Jan 2025 18:13
Last modified: 11 Feb 2025 03:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Benjamin A. Lyons
Author:
Jacob M. Montgomery
Author:
Andrew M. Guess
Author:
Brendan Nyhan
Author:
Jason Reifler
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics