The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

To what extent do public financial management systems support fiscal transparency and public accountability?

To what extent do public financial management systems support fiscal transparency and public accountability?
To what extent do public financial management systems support fiscal transparency and public accountability?
This study examines the consequences of PFM systems in the context of developing countries. More specifically, the study first investigates the association between PFM systems, and both fiscal transparency and public accountability, and whether existing economic, political and social institutional oversight factors in developing countries (e.g., supreme audit institution (SAI) independence, parliamentary oversight, and female participation in political leadership) moderate the association between PFM systems, and both fiscal transparency and public accountability. Finally, it explores the role of PFM systems in terms of addressing the issues of potential opportunities for corruption during (and after) periods of national/global emergencies. To meet these objectives, the first stage involves a quantitative approach (i.e., regression analyses) using the largest country-level datasets to date. For the second stage, to complement our understanding of PFM systems during ‘normal periods’ by considering the impact of COVID-19, the study undertakes qualitative field research in three developing countries - Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Ghana. Our findings show that an improved PFM system is associated with an improved fiscal transparency and improved public accountability, and institutional factors have a partial positive moderating effect on association between PFM systems, and fiscal transparency and public accountability. While PFM reforms have resulted in some positive changes (e.g., digitalization) in the area of ‘accounting and reporting’, weak implementation and enforcement of existing PFM systems still appear to be an issue, and notably in the area of public procurement and oversight. This study contributes to the existing policy debates and academic literature by examining the role and impact of PFM in supporting fiscal transparency and public accountability with a focus on the role of national oversight institutions and the lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Finally, a number of policy recommendations are put forward
Public financial management, Fiscal transparency, Public accountability
The PEFA Secretariat
Upadhaya, Bedanand
d4fe05b3-b62e-4717-97ac-82e657d2d3e3
Soobaroyen, Teerooven
26c8dc39-5d8c-46de-a475-b3d145c2e0de
Ntim, Collins
1f344edc-8005-4e96-8972-d56c4dade46b
Adhikari, Pawan
2740d904-2cbe-4417-9835-f4758e08873e
Jayasinghe, Kelum
df7b5279-7569-49f7-8976-ade0d91843b1
Zalata, Alaa
0fc2c56d-97ad-44ce-ab31-63ca335dcef6
Haque, Faizul
8153d83c-427a-4f73-860d-dd7e9460533d
Upadhaya, Bedanand
d4fe05b3-b62e-4717-97ac-82e657d2d3e3
Soobaroyen, Teerooven
26c8dc39-5d8c-46de-a475-b3d145c2e0de
Ntim, Collins
1f344edc-8005-4e96-8972-d56c4dade46b
Adhikari, Pawan
2740d904-2cbe-4417-9835-f4758e08873e
Jayasinghe, Kelum
df7b5279-7569-49f7-8976-ade0d91843b1
Zalata, Alaa
0fc2c56d-97ad-44ce-ab31-63ca335dcef6
Haque, Faizul
8153d83c-427a-4f73-860d-dd7e9460533d

Upadhaya, Bedanand, Soobaroyen, Teerooven, Ntim, Collins, Adhikari, Pawan, Jayasinghe, Kelum, Zalata, Alaa and Haque, Faizul (2024) To what extent do public financial management systems support fiscal transparency and public accountability? (PEFA Research Paper Series) The PEFA Secretariat 87pp.

Record type: Monograph (Project Report)

Abstract

This study examines the consequences of PFM systems in the context of developing countries. More specifically, the study first investigates the association between PFM systems, and both fiscal transparency and public accountability, and whether existing economic, political and social institutional oversight factors in developing countries (e.g., supreme audit institution (SAI) independence, parliamentary oversight, and female participation in political leadership) moderate the association between PFM systems, and both fiscal transparency and public accountability. Finally, it explores the role of PFM systems in terms of addressing the issues of potential opportunities for corruption during (and after) periods of national/global emergencies. To meet these objectives, the first stage involves a quantitative approach (i.e., regression analyses) using the largest country-level datasets to date. For the second stage, to complement our understanding of PFM systems during ‘normal periods’ by considering the impact of COVID-19, the study undertakes qualitative field research in three developing countries - Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Ghana. Our findings show that an improved PFM system is associated with an improved fiscal transparency and improved public accountability, and institutional factors have a partial positive moderating effect on association between PFM systems, and fiscal transparency and public accountability. While PFM reforms have resulted in some positive changes (e.g., digitalization) in the area of ‘accounting and reporting’, weak implementation and enforcement of existing PFM systems still appear to be an issue, and notably in the area of public procurement and oversight. This study contributes to the existing policy debates and academic literature by examining the role and impact of PFM in supporting fiscal transparency and public accountability with a focus on the role of national oversight institutions and the lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Finally, a number of policy recommendations are put forward

Text
PEFA Report PFM and Accountability 20241029 - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (5MB)

More information

Published date: 9 December 2024
Keywords: Public financial management, Fiscal transparency, Public accountability

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497276
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497276
PURE UUID: f138bf81-26e2-46d7-b420-a2b2bd082acb
ORCID for Collins Ntim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-4056
ORCID for Alaa Zalata: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-4313
ORCID for Faizul Haque: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-3466

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jan 2025 17:35
Last modified: 18 Jan 2025 03:11

Export record

Contributors

Author: Bedanand Upadhaya
Author: Teerooven Soobaroyen
Author: Collins Ntim ORCID iD
Author: Pawan Adhikari
Author: Kelum Jayasinghe
Author: Alaa Zalata ORCID iD
Author: Faizul Haque ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×