The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluating the adherence to the risk assessment and prophylaxis of fragility fractures in stroke patients at University Hospital Southampton

Evaluating the adherence to the risk assessment and prophylaxis of fragility fractures in stroke patients at University Hospital Southampton
Evaluating the adherence to the risk assessment and prophylaxis of fragility fractures in stroke patients at University Hospital Southampton
Introduction: osteoporosis and bone health is not well managed or often addressed inpatients who have suffered a stroke. We aimed to review our currentpractice to see if improvements could be made.

Method: a snapshot of patients admitted to the stroke unit was performed inFebruary 2024. This ensured a manageable sample size which reflectedclearly and honestly the adherence of fragility fracture risk assessment. 26patients were included, and each was asked a focused set of questionsaimed at calculating a FRAX score.

Results: 26 patients5 (61%) patients were on the correct level of intervention fortheir calculated fragility fracture risk, whilst 9 (39%) required moreintervention. All patients receiving the correct therapy response werealready prescribed before this admission.9 patients were at low risk (36%). 8 were at intermediate risk (32%). 6were at high risk (24%) and 2 were at very high risk (8%). For those whowere at intermediate risk and required a bone mineral density scan, nonehad been performed or requested at that time. 11 patients were prescribedbone protection including bisphosphonates (n=9) and vitamin Dsupplements (n=11), and had previous osteoporosis with 7 having hadprevious fragility fractures.

Conclusions: This improvement project highlights the importance of fragility fracture riskassessment in routine clinical practice. Only 61% of patients received boneprotection as per NOGG guidelines, and those at highest risk did not have aBMD scan or expert opinion. Further education and reaudit is needed toimprove adherence to guidelines.
1747-4930
Cerejo, E.
68f3883e-e017-4d56-9082-fdc0954d415f
Elserafy, A.
2678fa42-ac19-4d48-a90a-b5e0f5ae3840
Ghosh, B.
d43e4603-05b8-4856-828a-c3308d42bfcf
Veighy, K.
79e04430-0d1b-4837-94c9-3485f5de74e8
Marigold, R.
23c9f4cc-a1da-41a0-84bd-8e1aee91ed78
Cerejo, E.
68f3883e-e017-4d56-9082-fdc0954d415f
Elserafy, A.
2678fa42-ac19-4d48-a90a-b5e0f5ae3840
Ghosh, B.
d43e4603-05b8-4856-828a-c3308d42bfcf
Veighy, K.
79e04430-0d1b-4837-94c9-3485f5de74e8
Marigold, R.
23c9f4cc-a1da-41a0-84bd-8e1aee91ed78

Cerejo, E., Elserafy, A., Ghosh, B., Veighy, K. and Marigold, R. (2024) Evaluating the adherence to the risk assessment and prophylaxis of fragility fractures in stroke patients at University Hospital Southampton. International Journal of Stroke, 19 (3 Suppl.). (doi:10.1177/17474930241300284).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Introduction: osteoporosis and bone health is not well managed or often addressed inpatients who have suffered a stroke. We aimed to review our currentpractice to see if improvements could be made.

Method: a snapshot of patients admitted to the stroke unit was performed inFebruary 2024. This ensured a manageable sample size which reflectedclearly and honestly the adherence of fragility fracture risk assessment. 26patients were included, and each was asked a focused set of questionsaimed at calculating a FRAX score.

Results: 26 patients5 (61%) patients were on the correct level of intervention fortheir calculated fragility fracture risk, whilst 9 (39%) required moreintervention. All patients receiving the correct therapy response werealready prescribed before this admission.9 patients were at low risk (36%). 8 were at intermediate risk (32%). 6were at high risk (24%) and 2 were at very high risk (8%). For those whowere at intermediate risk and required a bone mineral density scan, nonehad been performed or requested at that time. 11 patients were prescribedbone protection including bisphosphonates (n=9) and vitamin Dsupplements (n=11), and had previous osteoporosis with 7 having hadprevious fragility fractures.

Conclusions: This improvement project highlights the importance of fragility fracture riskassessment in routine clinical practice. Only 61% of patients received boneprotection as per NOGG guidelines, and those at highest risk did not have aBMD scan or expert opinion. Further education and reaudit is needed toimprove adherence to guidelines.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 12 December 2024
Venue - Dates: 19th UK Stroke Forum Conference, , Liverpool, United Kingdom, 2024-12-03 - 2024-12-05

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497277
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497277
ISSN: 1747-4930
PURE UUID: 97488387-a875-4176-acae-ad5e7ffdcd39

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jan 2025 17:35
Last modified: 17 Jan 2025 18:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: E. Cerejo
Author: A. Elserafy
Author: B. Ghosh
Author: K. Veighy
Author: R. Marigold

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×