General practice community pharmacist consultation service: an exploratory patient survey
General practice community pharmacist consultation service: an exploratory patient survey
Background: the General Practice Community Pharmacist Consultation Service (GP CPCS) was established to allow patients with certain minor illnesses to be referred to a community pharmacy for assessment and treatment.
Aim: to explore patients’ experiences of the GP CPCS.
Design & setting: an online survey in two regions of England.
Method: 25 general practices invited patients to take part in an exploratory survey. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis.
Results: the response rate was 5.1% (72/1423). Prior to contacting their general practice, 14.1% (9/64) had tried to speak to a pharmacist. Most respondents accepted the CPCS referral (77.3%, 51/66), received a pharmacy consultation on the same day (80.0%, 40/50) and were largely satisfied with the amount of time the pharmacist spent with them (82.5%, 33/40) the consultation format (68.3%, 28/41) and the privacy provided during the consultation (80.9%, 38/47).
However, most respondents (56.5%, 39/69) felt poorly informed by the general practice on why they were being advised to speak to a pharmacist and did not feel that it was appropriate that they had been advised to speak to a community pharmacist (54.2%, 39/72). Only 33.3% (16/48) felt that their consultation fully met their health needs and 27.1% (13/48) of patients described being re-referred from pharmacy back to their general practice.
Conclusion : in this exploratory study patients were largely accepting of the GP CPCS. Improvements in terms of explaining GP CPCS to patients, selecting patients appropriate for referral to the service and the appointment process may be of benefit.
Gauly, Julia
94bbd3d2-6daf-420d-8ca2-80d57d7cf857
Grimley, Catherine
813531d5-e9be-4fb8-a94d-e4bd8f256dbd
Dale, Jeremy
19fccbd2-1661-4d84-8a94-36bedb12a0e2
Gill, Paramjit Singh
33ace729-0f72-4764-9d8e-81b0b717eaa6
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Gauly, Julia
94bbd3d2-6daf-420d-8ca2-80d57d7cf857
Grimley, Catherine
813531d5-e9be-4fb8-a94d-e4bd8f256dbd
Dale, Jeremy
19fccbd2-1661-4d84-8a94-36bedb12a0e2
Gill, Paramjit Singh
33ace729-0f72-4764-9d8e-81b0b717eaa6
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Gauly, Julia, Grimley, Catherine, Dale, Jeremy, Gill, Paramjit Singh and Atherton, Helen
(2024)
General practice community pharmacist consultation service: an exploratory patient survey.
BJGP Open.
(doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0204).
Abstract
Background: the General Practice Community Pharmacist Consultation Service (GP CPCS) was established to allow patients with certain minor illnesses to be referred to a community pharmacy for assessment and treatment.
Aim: to explore patients’ experiences of the GP CPCS.
Design & setting: an online survey in two regions of England.
Method: 25 general practices invited patients to take part in an exploratory survey. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis.
Results: the response rate was 5.1% (72/1423). Prior to contacting their general practice, 14.1% (9/64) had tried to speak to a pharmacist. Most respondents accepted the CPCS referral (77.3%, 51/66), received a pharmacy consultation on the same day (80.0%, 40/50) and were largely satisfied with the amount of time the pharmacist spent with them (82.5%, 33/40) the consultation format (68.3%, 28/41) and the privacy provided during the consultation (80.9%, 38/47).
However, most respondents (56.5%, 39/69) felt poorly informed by the general practice on why they were being advised to speak to a pharmacist and did not feel that it was appropriate that they had been advised to speak to a community pharmacist (54.2%, 39/72). Only 33.3% (16/48) felt that their consultation fully met their health needs and 27.1% (13/48) of patients described being re-referred from pharmacy back to their general practice.
Conclusion : in this exploratory study patients were largely accepting of the GP CPCS. Improvements in terms of explaining GP CPCS to patients, selecting patients appropriate for referral to the service and the appointment process may be of benefit.
Text
BJGPO.2024.0204.full
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 13 November 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 December 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 497370
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497370
ISSN: 2398-3795
PURE UUID: a4629e94-30c5-48fa-9577-3334b7e28c2f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Jan 2025 17:42
Last modified: 22 Jan 2025 03:13
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Julia Gauly
Author:
Catherine Grimley
Author:
Jeremy Dale
Author:
Paramjit Singh Gill
Author:
Helen Atherton
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics