Developing consensus on priorities for preconception care in the general practice setting in the UK: study protocol

Schoenaker, Danielle, Lovegrove, Elizabeth, Santer, Miriam, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Carr, Helen, Alwan, Nisreen A, Kubelabo, Laura, Davies, Nathan and Godfrey, Keith M (2024) Developing consensus on priorities for preconception care in the general practice setting in the UK: study protocol. PLoS ONE, 19 (11 November), [e0311578]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0311578).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preconception medical, behavioural and socioeconomic risk factors are common among people of reproductive age and can impact pregnancy and offspring outcomes. In line with clinical guidance, primary care practitioners are encouraged to support patients to manage and optimise their health prior to pregnancy. Due to barriers, including lack of time and resources, this support is not currently part of routine practice.

AIM: As a first step towards the co-development of practical and realistic best practice guidance, this study aims to achieve consensus on a list of priority risk factors that can be used in general practice to guide opportunistic preconception care for patients of reproductive age.

METHODS: This study protocol was developed with a Public Advisory Group of people of reproductive age, researchers and primary care practitioners. The consensus study will consist of three steps: 1) identifying an initial long-list of candidate risk factors and defining principles for scoring the importance of each risk factor, through a literature review, workshops with people of reproductive age, and interviews with primary care practitioners; 2) stakeholder participant prioritisation of each candidate risk factor for its importance for preconception care through a three-round eDelphi survey; and 3) agreeing on the final priority list through consensus meetings with a selected group of stakeholders. Participants living in the UK will be recruited across two stakeholder groups: people of reproductive age (through the Public Advisory Group and charities) and primary care professionals (through professional organisations).

ETHICAL APPROVAL: This study has been approved by the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (ERGO 83699 and 92950).

DISSEMINATION: All study findings will be shared through stakeholder participants, peer-reviewed publication, lay summary, meetings and conference presentations, and relevant professional and community organisations. Ongoing research will inform implementation of the priority list in clinical practice.

This record has no associated files available for download.

Contributors

Author: Danielle Schoenaker

Author: Miriam Santer

Author: Nisreen A Alwan

Author: Keith M Godfrey

Download statistics