The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Just nature recovery: a framework for centring multispecies and multi-dimensional justice in land management

Just nature recovery: a framework for centring multispecies and multi-dimensional justice in land management
Just nature recovery: a framework for centring multispecies and multi-dimensional justice in land management
A rising interest in nature recovery has expanded the focus of conservation beyond protected areas to encompass a range of terrestrial and marine areas, from forests, fields, and farms, to cities, coasts and oceans. These expansions create new practical and theoretical contestations regarding how, why, and for whom nature recovery projects should be pursued. Such contestations are particularly pronounced in Scotland, a country with a long history of struggles over land rights, widespread loss of natural habitats, and highly unequal land ownership patterns. This paper examines how different framings of justice, and different approaches to nature recovery, interact to either entrench or redress past and present injustices in a range of Scottish examples. We argue that multispecies conceptions of justice that eschew human-centric framings provide a normative basis for recovering nature, while multi-dimensional framings of justice as distributive, procedural and recognitional help specify a range of requirements for social change. Both frames highlight injustices in current trajectories and the need for alternative approaches to deliver a just transition in nature recovery. We outline a three-step process for further research on justice issues and for developing policy recommendations. This entails 1) historicising contexts, 2) considering both multispecies and multi-dimensional understandings of justice, and 3) uncovering alternative nature recovery strategies that might more explicitly foreground justice considerations.
Governance, Multi-dimensional justice, Multispecies justice, Nature recovery, Scotland
1462-9011
Stanley, Theo
b89a2a25-86a1-4cfb-8206-57cc93a8daee
Hirons, Mark
9061c861-de16-48b8-818a-adbc41c06df4
Turnbull, Jonathon
d9d31f78-606f-42ab-8144-f63a90f828fa
Lorimer, Jamie
b7d409e4-ab3f-4188-b817-97c07d6673e0
Kumeh, Eric Mensah
91105a76-7c07-408b-977b-d0f502acab61
Hafferty, Caitlin
3a87d3b5-72d5-4899-b8b6-b2dc1499dfd5
Anderson, Lea May
889c0606-42bb-4f53-ab4a-ee2ee73bd0bb
McDermott, Constance L.
0e0d81b8-2a51-4ebf-b0cb-a34b8180a56c
Stanley, Theo
b89a2a25-86a1-4cfb-8206-57cc93a8daee
Hirons, Mark
9061c861-de16-48b8-818a-adbc41c06df4
Turnbull, Jonathon
d9d31f78-606f-42ab-8144-f63a90f828fa
Lorimer, Jamie
b7d409e4-ab3f-4188-b817-97c07d6673e0
Kumeh, Eric Mensah
91105a76-7c07-408b-977b-d0f502acab61
Hafferty, Caitlin
3a87d3b5-72d5-4899-b8b6-b2dc1499dfd5
Anderson, Lea May
889c0606-42bb-4f53-ab4a-ee2ee73bd0bb
McDermott, Constance L.
0e0d81b8-2a51-4ebf-b0cb-a34b8180a56c

Stanley, Theo, Hirons, Mark, Turnbull, Jonathon, Lorimer, Jamie, Kumeh, Eric Mensah, Hafferty, Caitlin, Anderson, Lea May and McDermott, Constance L. (2025) Just nature recovery: a framework for centring multispecies and multi-dimensional justice in land management. Environmental Science & Policy, 164, [103992]. (doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.103992).

Record type: Article

Abstract

A rising interest in nature recovery has expanded the focus of conservation beyond protected areas to encompass a range of terrestrial and marine areas, from forests, fields, and farms, to cities, coasts and oceans. These expansions create new practical and theoretical contestations regarding how, why, and for whom nature recovery projects should be pursued. Such contestations are particularly pronounced in Scotland, a country with a long history of struggles over land rights, widespread loss of natural habitats, and highly unequal land ownership patterns. This paper examines how different framings of justice, and different approaches to nature recovery, interact to either entrench or redress past and present injustices in a range of Scottish examples. We argue that multispecies conceptions of justice that eschew human-centric framings provide a normative basis for recovering nature, while multi-dimensional framings of justice as distributive, procedural and recognitional help specify a range of requirements for social change. Both frames highlight injustices in current trajectories and the need for alternative approaches to deliver a just transition in nature recovery. We outline a three-step process for further research on justice issues and for developing policy recommendations. This entails 1) historicising contexts, 2) considering both multispecies and multi-dimensional understandings of justice, and 3) uncovering alternative nature recovery strategies that might more explicitly foreground justice considerations.

Text
1-s2.0-S1462901125000085-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (551kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 January 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 January 2025
Published date: 1 February 2025
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2025
Keywords: Governance, Multi-dimensional justice, Multispecies justice, Nature recovery, Scotland

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497495
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497495
ISSN: 1462-9011
PURE UUID: c66a1cb9-b6c8-4eca-8066-e7adf8c8913a
ORCID for Theo Stanley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8696-7658

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Jan 2025 17:53
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Theo Stanley ORCID iD
Author: Mark Hirons
Author: Jonathon Turnbull
Author: Jamie Lorimer
Author: Eric Mensah Kumeh
Author: Caitlin Hafferty
Author: Lea May Anderson
Author: Constance L. McDermott

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×