The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Do political connections matter for firm innovation? Evidence from emerging markets in Central Asia and Eastern Europe

Do political connections matter for firm innovation? Evidence from emerging markets in Central Asia and Eastern Europe
Do political connections matter for firm innovation? Evidence from emerging markets in Central Asia and Eastern Europe
We posit that the investments in political connections made by a firm in an emerging market will impact differently its propensity to introduce radical and incremental innovations. In addition, we argue that this effect will be moderated by alternate non-market firm strategies, such as bribery. Using a dataset of more than 9000 firms in 30 emerging economies from Eastern Europe and Central Asia we find that political connections increase the probability of radical innovation but have no significant impact on incremental innovation. Moreover, larger bribing reduces the positive impact of political connections on radical innovation. Our results confirm the importance of political connections for firm activities, but also caution firms on their heterogeneous impact on various types of innovations, and their detrimental interplay with other non-market strategies.
0040-1625
Krammer, Marius
24ce872e-5044-4846-bb35-88e12c74c854
Jimenez, Alfredo
6468ca24-e52e-4edb-9674-17a026007875
Krammer, Marius
24ce872e-5044-4846-bb35-88e12c74c854
Jimenez, Alfredo
6468ca24-e52e-4edb-9674-17a026007875

Krammer, Marius and Jimenez, Alfredo (2020) Do political connections matter for firm innovation? Evidence from emerging markets in Central Asia and Eastern Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, [119669]. (doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.027).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We posit that the investments in political connections made by a firm in an emerging market will impact differently its propensity to introduce radical and incremental innovations. In addition, we argue that this effect will be moderated by alternate non-market firm strategies, such as bribery. Using a dataset of more than 9000 firms in 30 emerging economies from Eastern Europe and Central Asia we find that political connections increase the probability of radical innovation but have no significant impact on incremental innovation. Moreover, larger bribing reduces the positive impact of political connections on radical innovation. Our results confirm the importance of political connections for firm activities, but also caution firms on their heterogeneous impact on various types of innovations, and their detrimental interplay with other non-market strategies.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 May 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 July 2019
Published date: 11 January 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497538
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497538
ISSN: 0040-1625
PURE UUID: e703aa26-4399-45b0-9ccb-e43338da64c0
ORCID for Marius Krammer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5773-9514

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Jan 2025 17:47
Last modified: 28 Jan 2025 03:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Marius Krammer ORCID iD
Author: Alfredo Jimenez

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×