A national survey of the provision of prehabilitation for oesophagogastric cancer patients in the UK
A national survey of the provision of prehabilitation for oesophagogastric cancer patients in the UK
Introduction: studies have demonstrated that prehabilitation in oesophagogastric cancer (OGC) improves body composition, physical fitness and quality of life, and can reduce surgical complications. However, it is not offered in all OGC centres. Furthermore, definitions, funding and access to services vary. We conducted a survey of prehabilitation in OGC centres in England and Wales.
Methods: OGC centres were identified through the National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit (NOGCA). Survey questions were developed, piloted in two institutions and distributed via email in October 2022. Reminder emails were sent over two months until the survey closed in December 2022.
Results: responses were received from 28 of 36 centres. There was near-universal agreement that prehabilitation should be considered standard of care for patients on curative pathways (27/28; 96%). Most centres (21/28; 75%) offered prehabilitation. The majority of respondents believed that prehabilitation should commence at diagnosis (27/28; 96%) and consist of at least aerobic training and dietitian input. Most (26/28; 93%) believed access to clinical psychologists should be included; however, only 12 (43%) had access to clinical psychologists. Respondents believed prehabilitation improves quality of life (26/28; 93%), fitness (26/28; 93%), smoking cessation (28/28; 100%), surgical complication rates (25/28; 89.3%), likelihood of proceeding to surgery (25/28; 89.3%) and overall survival (20/28; 71.4%).
Conclusions: despite barriers to funding and a lack of best practice guidelines, most units deliver prehabilitation. Units require higher quality evidence, consensus on the most important aspects of the intervention and core outcome sets to support the delivery of services and facilitate audit to assess the impact of their introduction.
Barman, S.
9c26586d-b2ca-448c-9cba-1ea2d524cb9b
Walker, R.C.
c8fbfe1c-349d-497f-b24e-0295c84c4634
Pucher, P.P.
b24aaf53-5aa4-491c-815e-9041e64e1505
Jack, S.
a175e649-83e1-4a76-8f11-ab37ffd954ea
Whyte, G.
8a405a49-3694-4122-a270-0fc9754aaf56
Grocott, M.P.W.
d974a4bc-332b-4d7a-b0c5-3212ff115cc5
West, M.
98b67e58-9875-4133-b236-8a10a0a12c04
Maynard, N.
b1551de8-a068-4e5d-89d2-9d47540c0dff
Underwood, T.
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6
Gossage, J.
8c32a048-2e69-44f3-a1e5-3844f9461520
Davies, A.
ee06e121-99a5-4af5-9f7c-96a69efc623a
OG Prehabilitation Group and AUGIS (Association of Upper GI Surgeons)
Barman, S.
9c26586d-b2ca-448c-9cba-1ea2d524cb9b
Walker, R.C.
c8fbfe1c-349d-497f-b24e-0295c84c4634
Pucher, P.P.
b24aaf53-5aa4-491c-815e-9041e64e1505
Jack, S.
a175e649-83e1-4a76-8f11-ab37ffd954ea
Whyte, G.
8a405a49-3694-4122-a270-0fc9754aaf56
Grocott, M.P.W.
d974a4bc-332b-4d7a-b0c5-3212ff115cc5
West, M.
98b67e58-9875-4133-b236-8a10a0a12c04
Maynard, N.
b1551de8-a068-4e5d-89d2-9d47540c0dff
Underwood, T.
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6
Gossage, J.
8c32a048-2e69-44f3-a1e5-3844f9461520
Davies, A.
ee06e121-99a5-4af5-9f7c-96a69efc623a
Barman, S., Walker, R.C. and Pucher, P.P.
,
OG Prehabilitation Group and AUGIS (Association of Upper GI Surgeons)
(2024)
A national survey of the provision of prehabilitation for oesophagogastric cancer patients in the UK.
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.
(doi:10.1308/rcsann.2024.0092).
Abstract
Introduction: studies have demonstrated that prehabilitation in oesophagogastric cancer (OGC) improves body composition, physical fitness and quality of life, and can reduce surgical complications. However, it is not offered in all OGC centres. Furthermore, definitions, funding and access to services vary. We conducted a survey of prehabilitation in OGC centres in England and Wales.
Methods: OGC centres were identified through the National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit (NOGCA). Survey questions were developed, piloted in two institutions and distributed via email in October 2022. Reminder emails were sent over two months until the survey closed in December 2022.
Results: responses were received from 28 of 36 centres. There was near-universal agreement that prehabilitation should be considered standard of care for patients on curative pathways (27/28; 96%). Most centres (21/28; 75%) offered prehabilitation. The majority of respondents believed that prehabilitation should commence at diagnosis (27/28; 96%) and consist of at least aerobic training and dietitian input. Most (26/28; 93%) believed access to clinical psychologists should be included; however, only 12 (43%) had access to clinical psychologists. Respondents believed prehabilitation improves quality of life (26/28; 93%), fitness (26/28; 93%), smoking cessation (28/28; 100%), surgical complication rates (25/28; 89.3%), likelihood of proceeding to surgery (25/28; 89.3%) and overall survival (20/28; 71.4%).
Conclusions: despite barriers to funding and a lack of best practice guidelines, most units deliver prehabilitation. Units require higher quality evidence, consensus on the most important aspects of the intervention and core outcome sets to support the delivery of services and facilitate audit to assess the impact of their introduction.
Text
barman-et-al-2024-a-national-survey-of-the-provision-of-prehabilitation-for-oesophagogastric-cancer-patients-in-the-uk
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 28 September 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 November 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 497626
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497626
ISSN: 0035-8843
PURE UUID: dd6f50db-3a84-4a26-8200-b3571119da58
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Jan 2025 17:56
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:19
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
S. Barman
Author:
R.C. Walker
Author:
P.P. Pucher
Author:
S. Jack
Author:
G. Whyte
Author:
M.P.W. Grocott
Author:
N. Maynard
Author:
J. Gossage
Author:
A. Davies
Corporate Author: OG Prehabilitation Group and AUGIS (Association of Upper GI Surgeons)
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics