A critical review on the rationality of popular failure criteria for composites
A critical review on the rationality of popular failure criteria for composites
Popular failure criteria for fibre reinforced composites are subjected to critical scrutiny on their rationality. The rationality of a theory is about the mathematical and physical logic underlying the theory, rather than the closeness of its results in comparison with experimental data. Seeking for close comparisons with a set of experimental data before obtaining a basic level of rationality is not a scientific attitude, although the practice is becoming the norm in the community of science and engineering. A theory lacking of rationality can never be a sound one no matter how closely it compares with experimental data in one respect or another, since a good comparison in one respect comes at a price of poor agreement in some other respects usually, either unknown for the time being or hidden deliberately. The objective of this paper to raise the awareness of rationality, or the lack of it, in existing theories so that the users will be warned to exercise their judgement on the applicability of these theories before employing them in future. It should also help the researchers avoid incorporating illogical considerations into the formulations of the new theories they are developing.
7-13
Li, Shuguang
f99c53b3-e42e-456f-97df-4c4e06de4a40
Sitnikova, Elena
e0c2f901-24fe-43d0-88e8-76f415675104
1 June 2018
Li, Shuguang
f99c53b3-e42e-456f-97df-4c4e06de4a40
Sitnikova, Elena
e0c2f901-24fe-43d0-88e8-76f415675104
Li, Shuguang and Sitnikova, Elena
(2018)
A critical review on the rationality of popular failure criteria for composites.
Composites Communications, 8, .
(doi:10.1016/j.coco.2018.02.002).
Abstract
Popular failure criteria for fibre reinforced composites are subjected to critical scrutiny on their rationality. The rationality of a theory is about the mathematical and physical logic underlying the theory, rather than the closeness of its results in comparison with experimental data. Seeking for close comparisons with a set of experimental data before obtaining a basic level of rationality is not a scientific attitude, although the practice is becoming the norm in the community of science and engineering. A theory lacking of rationality can never be a sound one no matter how closely it compares with experimental data in one respect or another, since a good comparison in one respect comes at a price of poor agreement in some other respects usually, either unknown for the time being or hidden deliberately. The objective of this paper to raise the awareness of rationality, or the lack of it, in existing theories so that the users will be warned to exercise their judgement on the applicability of these theories before employing them in future. It should also help the researchers avoid incorporating illogical considerations into the formulations of the new theories they are developing.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 21 February 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 March 2018
Published date: 1 June 2018
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 497650
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497650
ISSN: 2452-2139
PURE UUID: f7af9d8d-d45f-4b22-87ab-8dc0a353db65
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Jan 2025 18:13
Last modified: 29 Jan 2025 03:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Shuguang Li
Author:
Elena Sitnikova
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics