On rational behavior in multi-attribute riskless choice
On rational behavior in multi-attribute riskless choice
We theoretically compare and contrast two commonly used types of choice strategies in a riskless, multi-attribute setting: (1) the win-win (or Pareto improving) strategy, and (2) the tradeoff strategy. Both strategies can be used and are used in Multiple Criteria Decision Making theory and practice. In the win-win strategy, consumers (or decision-makers) consider, which goods they want to add to their basket. In the tradeoff strategy consumers make pairwise choices between different (efficient) baskets, where they have to give up in some goods to gain in other goods.
We postulate a choice model based on standard assumptions in economics/behavioral decision theory. The key underlying theoretical assumptions in our choice model are increasing and concave single dimensional value functions with decreasing marginal values (win-win setting) and the Tversky–Kahneman reference-dependent model of choice with loss aversion (tradeoff setting). The multi-attribute value function is assumed additive and separable. We study the decision-maker's consistency with our theory in both strategies. The perspective is that of an outside observer (an analyst). The basket is filled either with different or identical goods. We compare and contrast the win-win and tradeoff strategies and draw conclusions for the development of our field. We use an empirical experiment to motivate our considerations.
331-342
Korhonen, Pekka
47ba99d9-b3c3-4573-83ca-ba50323abbb8
Wallenius, Jyrki
f190c927-27bc-4b37-859f-031712c41db0
Genc, Tolga
13e9e403-4815-44d9-88d7-1a1b1201e2aa
Xu, Peng
4a72430c-992e-40e5-be0b-e8d9d83d6f3d
20 August 2021
Korhonen, Pekka
47ba99d9-b3c3-4573-83ca-ba50323abbb8
Wallenius, Jyrki
f190c927-27bc-4b37-859f-031712c41db0
Genc, Tolga
13e9e403-4815-44d9-88d7-1a1b1201e2aa
Xu, Peng
4a72430c-992e-40e5-be0b-e8d9d83d6f3d
Korhonen, Pekka, Wallenius, Jyrki, Genc, Tolga and Xu, Peng
(2021)
On rational behavior in multi-attribute riskless choice.
European Journal of Operational Research, 288 (1), .
(doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.056).
Abstract
We theoretically compare and contrast two commonly used types of choice strategies in a riskless, multi-attribute setting: (1) the win-win (or Pareto improving) strategy, and (2) the tradeoff strategy. Both strategies can be used and are used in Multiple Criteria Decision Making theory and practice. In the win-win strategy, consumers (or decision-makers) consider, which goods they want to add to their basket. In the tradeoff strategy consumers make pairwise choices between different (efficient) baskets, where they have to give up in some goods to gain in other goods.
We postulate a choice model based on standard assumptions in economics/behavioral decision theory. The key underlying theoretical assumptions in our choice model are increasing and concave single dimensional value functions with decreasing marginal values (win-win setting) and the Tversky–Kahneman reference-dependent model of choice with loss aversion (tradeoff setting). The multi-attribute value function is assumed additive and separable. We study the decision-maker's consistency with our theory in both strategies. The perspective is that of an outside observer (an analyst). The basket is filled either with different or identical goods. We compare and contrast the win-win and tradeoff strategies and draw conclusions for the development of our field. We use an empirical experiment to motivate our considerations.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 29 May 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 June 2020
Published date: 20 August 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 497838
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497838
ISSN: 0377-2217
PURE UUID: 9dba0546-d74a-4932-98cb-a5fbde41658e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Feb 2025 17:36
Last modified: 04 Feb 2025 03:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Pekka Korhonen
Author:
Jyrki Wallenius
Author:
Tolga Genc
Author:
Peng Xu
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics