The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Investigation of the performance of Unequal co-axial rotors

Investigation of the performance of Unequal co-axial rotors
Investigation of the performance of Unequal co-axial rotors
The behaviour of co-axial rotors is well understood, and they are especially practical for large UAVs due to their increased thrust without changing the vehicle footprint. However, for co-axial systems with varying propeller diameters between the two disks, research is more limited. The goal of this paper was to determine an optimal configuration for several different unequal co-axial setups using numerous different propeller combinations and separation ratios. Propellers with diameters of 26 and 29 inches are tested at separation ratios of 0.05 to 0.35. Thrust and power were collected using an off-the-shelf FS15-TYTO thrust stand, with the upstream and downstream propellers running at equal throttles. From this, performance was assessed through efficiency, thrust, and power consumption, and comparisons were made to an ideal combination without losses. The results show that for unequal combinations, the user should place the smaller propeller upstream for greater efficiency, but for maximum thrust capacity, two equal propellers are preferred. When compared to two independent rotors of the same size, a 26″ upstream rotor and a 29″ downstream rotor minimised thrust loss to 16%, compared to 23% for the opposite arrangement. It was also found that the optimal separation ratio is always approximately 0.2.
rotor, unequal, drone, co-axial
2958-7670
Miles, Max
3e95b5ce-792f-4680-b4c6-e33759a800e0
Prior, Stephen D.
9c753e49-092a-4dc5-b4cd-6d5ff77e9ced
Miles, Max
3e95b5ce-792f-4680-b4c6-e33759a800e0
Prior, Stephen D.
9c753e49-092a-4dc5-b4cd-6d5ff77e9ced

Miles, Max and Prior, Stephen D. (2025) Investigation of the performance of Unequal co-axial rotors. Drones and Autonomous Vehicles, 2 (1), [10002]. (doi:10.70322/dav.2025.10002).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The behaviour of co-axial rotors is well understood, and they are especially practical for large UAVs due to their increased thrust without changing the vehicle footprint. However, for co-axial systems with varying propeller diameters between the two disks, research is more limited. The goal of this paper was to determine an optimal configuration for several different unequal co-axial setups using numerous different propeller combinations and separation ratios. Propellers with diameters of 26 and 29 inches are tested at separation ratios of 0.05 to 0.35. Thrust and power were collected using an off-the-shelf FS15-TYTO thrust stand, with the upstream and downstream propellers running at equal throttles. From this, performance was assessed through efficiency, thrust, and power consumption, and comparisons were made to an ideal combination without losses. The results show that for unequal combinations, the user should place the smaller propeller upstream for greater efficiency, but for maximum thrust capacity, two equal propellers are preferred. When compared to two independent rotors of the same size, a 26″ upstream rotor and a 29″ downstream rotor minimised thrust loss to 16%, compared to 23% for the opposite arrangement. It was also found that the optimal separation ratio is always approximately 0.2.

Text
24be80270c66e74051a15c9571cd6bb9 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 January 2025
Published date: 10 January 2025
Keywords: rotor, unequal, drone, co-axial

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497886
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497886
ISSN: 2958-7670
PURE UUID: 112a09d9-f8d0-418b-9e45-0ee0a42fbdae
ORCID for Stephen D. Prior: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4993-4942

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Feb 2025 17:34
Last modified: 05 Feb 2025 02:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Max Miles

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×