Reliability of pulse waveform separation analysis responses to an orthostatic challenge
Reliability of pulse waveform separation analysis responses to an orthostatic challenge
Cardiovascular autonomic nervous system function can be assessed using an orthostatic challenge to induce arterial wave reflection. While arterial reflection is typically estimated using a central augmentation index, a superior estimation can be obtained using pulse wave separation analysis to estimate the aortic backward pressure wave (Pb). However, to be of value in a clinical or research setting, an assessment tool must be precise (reliable). Therefore, this study sought to determine the measurement precision of Pb responses to a modified tilt-table test. Twenty healthy adults (26.4 year (SD 5.2), 24.7 kg/m2 (SD 3.8), 55% female) were tested in a fasted state on three different mornings separated by a maximum of seven days. Pressure waveforms were recorded on the left arm, and aortic waveforms were generated using a generalized transfer function. Subsequently, a physiologic flow waveform was assumed to separate the aortic pressure wave into its forward and timing-independent backward (Pb) components. The criterion intra-class correlation coefficient of ≥0.75 was exceeded at baseline (0.79), following a 5-min tilt (0.75), and following a 5-min recovery from tilt (0.75). The standard error of measurement was 7%. These findings indicate that in a healthy cohort, the Pb response to an orthostatic challenge can be assessed with acceptable precision. The next step is to determine the sensitivity (validity) of this technique in identifying cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in patient groups.
Adult, Aorta/physiology, Arm/blood supply, Arterial Pressure, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis, Blood Pressure, Cohort Studies, Female, Healthy Volunteers, Humans, Male, Pulse Wave Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Standing Position, Tilt-Table Test, Young Adult
176-182
Stoner, Lee
fc664371-fcdc-412d-b2c2-1c1ce983b95e
Stone, Keeron
d2ca8269-7990-40cd-888d-01ad8c6cfdd1
Hanson, Erik D
f50a6fc9-4ad2-4925-8757-2f53436e0f1b
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Fryer, Simon
9935c568-e5fc-4b23-a39e-525d9d61da70
Credeur, Daniel
82dd8ccb-50ea-4123-a844-c15516578821
15 January 2018
Stoner, Lee
fc664371-fcdc-412d-b2c2-1c1ce983b95e
Stone, Keeron
d2ca8269-7990-40cd-888d-01ad8c6cfdd1
Hanson, Erik D
f50a6fc9-4ad2-4925-8757-2f53436e0f1b
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Fryer, Simon
9935c568-e5fc-4b23-a39e-525d9d61da70
Credeur, Daniel
82dd8ccb-50ea-4123-a844-c15516578821
Stoner, Lee, Stone, Keeron, Hanson, Erik D, Faulkner, James, Fryer, Simon and Credeur, Daniel
(2018)
Reliability of pulse waveform separation analysis responses to an orthostatic challenge.
Hypertension Research, 41 (3), .
(doi:10.1038/s41440-017-0005-1).
Abstract
Cardiovascular autonomic nervous system function can be assessed using an orthostatic challenge to induce arterial wave reflection. While arterial reflection is typically estimated using a central augmentation index, a superior estimation can be obtained using pulse wave separation analysis to estimate the aortic backward pressure wave (Pb). However, to be of value in a clinical or research setting, an assessment tool must be precise (reliable). Therefore, this study sought to determine the measurement precision of Pb responses to a modified tilt-table test. Twenty healthy adults (26.4 year (SD 5.2), 24.7 kg/m2 (SD 3.8), 55% female) were tested in a fasted state on three different mornings separated by a maximum of seven days. Pressure waveforms were recorded on the left arm, and aortic waveforms were generated using a generalized transfer function. Subsequently, a physiologic flow waveform was assumed to separate the aortic pressure wave into its forward and timing-independent backward (Pb) components. The criterion intra-class correlation coefficient of ≥0.75 was exceeded at baseline (0.79), following a 5-min tilt (0.75), and following a 5-min recovery from tilt (0.75). The standard error of measurement was 7%. These findings indicate that in a healthy cohort, the Pb response to an orthostatic challenge can be assessed with acceptable precision. The next step is to determine the sensitivity (validity) of this technique in identifying cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in patient groups.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 15 January 2018
Keywords:
Adult, Aorta/physiology, Arm/blood supply, Arterial Pressure, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis, Blood Pressure, Cohort Studies, Female, Healthy Volunteers, Humans, Male, Pulse Wave Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Standing Position, Tilt-Table Test, Young Adult
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 497897
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497897
ISSN: 0916-9636
PURE UUID: 20c3b89f-fa41-423c-aa3e-a4986fc4a920
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Feb 2025 17:41
Last modified: 05 Feb 2025 03:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Lee Stoner
Author:
Keeron Stone
Author:
Erik D Hanson
Author:
James Faulkner
Author:
Simon Fryer
Author:
Daniel Credeur
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics