The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adults with breast cancer by physical activity type and mode of participation

A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adults with breast cancer by physical activity type and mode of participation
A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adults with breast cancer by physical activity type and mode of participation

OBJECTIVES: Engaging in physical activity following a diagnosis in breast cancer patients improves both survival rates and psychosocial health outcomes. The factors influencing the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for breast cancer patients remain unclear. This systematic review focuses on two questions: are there differences in outcomes depending on; the mode of physical activity undertaken; and whether group-based, or individual, programmes are proposed.

METHODS: Five databases were searched (PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Central). Randomised control trials were included if they reported an intervention aiming to increase physical activity amongst breast cancer patients. A total of 1561 records were screened with 17 studies identified for final inclusion. Data extraction and risk of bias analysis were undertaken. A meta-analysis was not possible due to methodological differences between studies.

RESULTS: Findings indicate no evident differences in outcomes based on exercise mode adopted. There are some indications that group interventions may have additional beneficial outcomes, in comparison to individual interventions, but this conclusion cannot be drawn definitively due to confounds within study designs, lack of group-based intervention designs, and overall lack of long-term intervention effects.

CONCLUSIONS: Although there are no indications of negative intervention effects, only 6 of 17 trials demonstrated significant intervention effects were maintained. Greater transparency in reporting of interventions, and research enabling a comparison of physical activity delivery and mode is needed to determine optimum physical activity interventions to maintain patient physical activity and outcomes.

Adult, Breast Neoplasms/psychology, Cancer Survivors/psychology, Depression/prevention & control, Exercise/psychology, Female, Health Behavior, Humans, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Quality of Life/psychology, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
1057-9249
1381-1393
Abdin, Shanara
23bcda00-2df2-4cd0-8909-284bb286c56c
Lavallée, Jacqueline F
230b62ef-f30b-48a9-9ecf-b8950e938f24
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Husted, Margaret
21af4875-9939-4653-a5c2-f210f2ccc4c7
Abdin, Shanara
23bcda00-2df2-4cd0-8909-284bb286c56c
Lavallée, Jacqueline F
230b62ef-f30b-48a9-9ecf-b8950e938f24
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Husted, Margaret
21af4875-9939-4653-a5c2-f210f2ccc4c7

Abdin, Shanara, Lavallée, Jacqueline F, Faulkner, James and Husted, Margaret (2019) A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adults with breast cancer by physical activity type and mode of participation. Psycho-Oncology, 28 (7), 1381-1393. (doi:10.1002/pon.5101).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Engaging in physical activity following a diagnosis in breast cancer patients improves both survival rates and psychosocial health outcomes. The factors influencing the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for breast cancer patients remain unclear. This systematic review focuses on two questions: are there differences in outcomes depending on; the mode of physical activity undertaken; and whether group-based, or individual, programmes are proposed.

METHODS: Five databases were searched (PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Central). Randomised control trials were included if they reported an intervention aiming to increase physical activity amongst breast cancer patients. A total of 1561 records were screened with 17 studies identified for final inclusion. Data extraction and risk of bias analysis were undertaken. A meta-analysis was not possible due to methodological differences between studies.

RESULTS: Findings indicate no evident differences in outcomes based on exercise mode adopted. There are some indications that group interventions may have additional beneficial outcomes, in comparison to individual interventions, but this conclusion cannot be drawn definitively due to confounds within study designs, lack of group-based intervention designs, and overall lack of long-term intervention effects.

CONCLUSIONS: Although there are no indications of negative intervention effects, only 6 of 17 trials demonstrated significant intervention effects were maintained. Greater transparency in reporting of interventions, and research enabling a comparison of physical activity delivery and mode is needed to determine optimum physical activity interventions to maintain patient physical activity and outcomes.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 30 April 2019
Additional Information: © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: Adult, Breast Neoplasms/psychology, Cancer Survivors/psychology, Depression/prevention & control, Exercise/psychology, Female, Health Behavior, Humans, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Quality of Life/psychology, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497900
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497900
ISSN: 1057-9249
PURE UUID: c5afe0e0-1509-4cbd-90e9-d96fdfc5656b
ORCID for James Faulkner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3704-6737

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Feb 2025 17:42
Last modified: 08 Feb 2025 03:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Shanara Abdin
Author: Jacqueline F Lavallée
Author: James Faulkner ORCID iD
Author: Margaret Husted

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×