The impact of upper-limb position on estimated central blood pressure waveforms
The impact of upper-limb position on estimated central blood pressure waveforms
Pulse wave analysis (PWA) utilizes arm blood pressure (BP) waveforms to estimate aortic waveforms. The accuracy of central BP waveform estimation may be influenced by assessment site local haemodynamics. This study investigated whether local haemodynamic changes, induced via arm tilting ±30° relative to heart level, affect estimated central systolic BP (cSBP) and arterial wave reflection (central augmentation index, cAIx; aortic backward pressure wave, Pb). In 20 healthy adults (26.7 years [SD 5.2], 10 F) brachial BP waveforms were simultaneously recorded on experimental and control arms. The experimental arm was randomly repositioned three times (heart level, -30° heart level, +30° heart level), while the control arm remained fixed at heart level. For the experimental arm, arm repositioning resulted in a large (partial eta-squared > 0.14) effect size (ES) change in SBP (ES = 0.75, P < 0.001), cSBP (ES = 0.81, P < 0.001), and cAIx (ES = 0.75, P = 0.002), but not Pb (ES = 0.06, P = 0.38). In the control arm, cAIx (ES = 0.22, P = 0.013) but not SBP or cSBP significantly changed. Change in experimental arm cSBP was partially explained by brachial systolic blood velocity (P = 0.026) and mean diameter (P = 0.012), while change in cAIx was associated with brachial retrograde blood velocity (P = 0.020) and beta stiffness (P = 0.038). In conclusion, manipulation of assessment site local haemodynamics, including the blood velocity profile and local arterial stiffness, had a large effect on estimated cSBP and cAIx, but not on Pb. These findings do not invalidate PWA devices but do suggest that the accuracy of the estimated aortic pressure waveform is dependent on stable peripheral haemodynamics.
Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Pressure/physiology, Female, Humans, Male, Posture, Pulse Wave Analysis, Systole/physiology, Upper Extremity, Young Adult
444-453
Stoner, Lee
fc664371-fcdc-412d-b2c2-1c1ce983b95e
Stone, Keeron
d2ca8269-7990-40cd-888d-01ad8c6cfdd1
Zieff, Gabriel
fe0464d5-788b-4f03-b558-f05c4c7179a9
Hanson, EriK D
f50a6fc9-4ad2-4925-8757-2f53436e0f1b
Credeur, Daniel
82dd8ccb-50ea-4123-a844-c15516578821
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Kucharska-Newton, Anna
96631f10-6a91-45e9-8ffb-b37dca5df95b
Fryer, Simon
9935c568-e5fc-4b23-a39e-525d9d61da70
25 February 2019
Stoner, Lee
fc664371-fcdc-412d-b2c2-1c1ce983b95e
Stone, Keeron
d2ca8269-7990-40cd-888d-01ad8c6cfdd1
Zieff, Gabriel
fe0464d5-788b-4f03-b558-f05c4c7179a9
Hanson, EriK D
f50a6fc9-4ad2-4925-8757-2f53436e0f1b
Credeur, Daniel
82dd8ccb-50ea-4123-a844-c15516578821
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Kucharska-Newton, Anna
96631f10-6a91-45e9-8ffb-b37dca5df95b
Fryer, Simon
9935c568-e5fc-4b23-a39e-525d9d61da70
Stoner, Lee, Stone, Keeron, Zieff, Gabriel, Hanson, EriK D, Credeur, Daniel, Faulkner, James, Kucharska-Newton, Anna and Fryer, Simon
(2019)
The impact of upper-limb position on estimated central blood pressure waveforms.
Journal of Human Hypertension, 33 (6), .
(doi:10.1038/s41371-019-0179-x).
Abstract
Pulse wave analysis (PWA) utilizes arm blood pressure (BP) waveforms to estimate aortic waveforms. The accuracy of central BP waveform estimation may be influenced by assessment site local haemodynamics. This study investigated whether local haemodynamic changes, induced via arm tilting ±30° relative to heart level, affect estimated central systolic BP (cSBP) and arterial wave reflection (central augmentation index, cAIx; aortic backward pressure wave, Pb). In 20 healthy adults (26.7 years [SD 5.2], 10 F) brachial BP waveforms were simultaneously recorded on experimental and control arms. The experimental arm was randomly repositioned three times (heart level, -30° heart level, +30° heart level), while the control arm remained fixed at heart level. For the experimental arm, arm repositioning resulted in a large (partial eta-squared > 0.14) effect size (ES) change in SBP (ES = 0.75, P < 0.001), cSBP (ES = 0.81, P < 0.001), and cAIx (ES = 0.75, P = 0.002), but not Pb (ES = 0.06, P = 0.38). In the control arm, cAIx (ES = 0.22, P = 0.013) but not SBP or cSBP significantly changed. Change in experimental arm cSBP was partially explained by brachial systolic blood velocity (P = 0.026) and mean diameter (P = 0.012), while change in cAIx was associated with brachial retrograde blood velocity (P = 0.020) and beta stiffness (P = 0.038). In conclusion, manipulation of assessment site local haemodynamics, including the blood velocity profile and local arterial stiffness, had a large effect on estimated cSBP and cAIx, but not on Pb. These findings do not invalidate PWA devices but do suggest that the accuracy of the estimated aortic pressure waveform is dependent on stable peripheral haemodynamics.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 25 February 2019
Keywords:
Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Pressure/physiology, Female, Humans, Male, Posture, Pulse Wave Analysis, Systole/physiology, Upper Extremity, Young Adult
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 497922
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497922
ISSN: 0950-9240
PURE UUID: 62306dc9-6b02-4571-9955-debed460a831
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Feb 2025 17:52
Last modified: 05 Feb 2025 03:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Lee Stoner
Author:
Keeron Stone
Author:
Gabriel Zieff
Author:
EriK D Hanson
Author:
Daniel Credeur
Author:
James Faulkner
Author:
Anna Kucharska-Newton
Author:
Simon Fryer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics