The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Validity of single-point assessments for determining leg pulse wave velocity in sitting and supine positions

Validity of single-point assessments for determining leg pulse wave velocity in sitting and supine positions
Validity of single-point assessments for determining leg pulse wave velocity in sitting and supine positions

There has been a great deal of interest into the effects of prolonged sitting on lower limb vascular function. However, most studies use flow-mediated dilation which is technically challenging. A simpler technique is pulse wave velocity (PWV) which can be estimated at any single arterial site of interest using a number of different calculations (Bramwell-hill [PWVBH ], β-stiffness index [PWVβ ] and blood flow [PWVBF ]). Findings from this technique would be better inferred if they compare to a standard criterion 2-point PWV assessment. The current study used ultrasound to determine which estimation of single-point PWV is most valid. The criterion was traditional ECG-gated 2-point (superficial femoral [SF]-posterior tibialis [PT]) PWV. Single-point estimates were calculated at the SF and PT arteries in both supine and seated positions. Single-point PWV was considered valid if the aSEE was <1.0 m·s. Findings show that for both postural positions, the absolute standard error of estimates (aSEE) criterion of <1.0 m·s was not achieved in either the PT or SF arteries using any of the single-point PWV calculations. However, single-point calculations consistently demonstrated the lowest error at the SF artery using PWVβ in both supine (SF aSEE = 1.7 vs. PT 2.7 m·s) and seated (SF aSEE = 1.5 vs. PT 3.0 m·s) positions. All single-point ΔPWV (supine - seated) calculations were higher in sitting, with PWVβ having the closest agreement (ΔSF aSEE 1.7 m·s) to the 2-point criterion. Single-point PWV calculations do not directly reflect regional 2-point PWV. However, they are sensitive to change when moving from supine to seated positions.

Adult, Blood Flow Velocity/physiology, Female, Humans, Leg/blood supply, Male, Pulse Wave Analysis/methods, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Sitting Position, Supine Position, Ultrasonography/methods
1475-0961
157-164
Fryer, Simon
9935c568-e5fc-4b23-a39e-525d9d61da70
Stone, Keeron
d2ca8269-7990-40cd-888d-01ad8c6cfdd1
Zieff, Gabriel
fe0464d5-788b-4f03-b558-f05c4c7179a9
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Credeur, Daniel
82dd8ccb-50ea-4123-a844-c15516578821
Stoner, Lee
fc664371-fcdc-412d-b2c2-1c1ce983b95e
Fryer, Simon
9935c568-e5fc-4b23-a39e-525d9d61da70
Stone, Keeron
d2ca8269-7990-40cd-888d-01ad8c6cfdd1
Zieff, Gabriel
fe0464d5-788b-4f03-b558-f05c4c7179a9
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Credeur, Daniel
82dd8ccb-50ea-4123-a844-c15516578821
Stoner, Lee
fc664371-fcdc-412d-b2c2-1c1ce983b95e

Fryer, Simon, Stone, Keeron, Zieff, Gabriel, Faulkner, James, Credeur, Daniel and Stoner, Lee (2019) Validity of single-point assessments for determining leg pulse wave velocity in sitting and supine positions. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 40 (3), 157-164. (doi:10.1111/cpf.12616).

Record type: Article

Abstract

There has been a great deal of interest into the effects of prolonged sitting on lower limb vascular function. However, most studies use flow-mediated dilation which is technically challenging. A simpler technique is pulse wave velocity (PWV) which can be estimated at any single arterial site of interest using a number of different calculations (Bramwell-hill [PWVBH ], β-stiffness index [PWVβ ] and blood flow [PWVBF ]). Findings from this technique would be better inferred if they compare to a standard criterion 2-point PWV assessment. The current study used ultrasound to determine which estimation of single-point PWV is most valid. The criterion was traditional ECG-gated 2-point (superficial femoral [SF]-posterior tibialis [PT]) PWV. Single-point estimates were calculated at the SF and PT arteries in both supine and seated positions. Single-point PWV was considered valid if the aSEE was <1.0 m·s. Findings show that for both postural positions, the absolute standard error of estimates (aSEE) criterion of <1.0 m·s was not achieved in either the PT or SF arteries using any of the single-point PWV calculations. However, single-point calculations consistently demonstrated the lowest error at the SF artery using PWVβ in both supine (SF aSEE = 1.7 vs. PT 2.7 m·s) and seated (SF aSEE = 1.5 vs. PT 3.0 m·s) positions. All single-point ΔPWV (supine - seated) calculations were higher in sitting, with PWVβ having the closest agreement (ΔSF aSEE 1.7 m·s) to the 2-point criterion. Single-point PWV calculations do not directly reflect regional 2-point PWV. However, they are sensitive to change when moving from supine to seated positions.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 27 December 2019
Additional Information: © 2020 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords: Adult, Blood Flow Velocity/physiology, Female, Humans, Leg/blood supply, Male, Pulse Wave Analysis/methods, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Sitting Position, Supine Position, Ultrasonography/methods

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497925
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497925
ISSN: 1475-0961
PURE UUID: f989f297-3950-49b6-9201-b4e4112a53e1
ORCID for James Faulkner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3704-6737

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Feb 2025 17:54
Last modified: 05 Feb 2025 03:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Simon Fryer
Author: Keeron Stone
Author: Gabriel Zieff
Author: James Faulkner ORCID iD
Author: Daniel Credeur
Author: Lee Stoner

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×