Validity of single-point assessments for determining leg pulse wave velocity in sitting and supine positions
Validity of single-point assessments for determining leg pulse wave velocity in sitting and supine positions
There has been a great deal of interest into the effects of prolonged sitting on lower limb vascular function. However, most studies use flow-mediated dilation which is technically challenging. A simpler technique is pulse wave velocity (PWV) which can be estimated at any single arterial site of interest using a number of different calculations (Bramwell-hill [PWVBH ], β-stiffness index [PWVβ ] and blood flow [PWVBF ]). Findings from this technique would be better inferred if they compare to a standard criterion 2-point PWV assessment. The current study used ultrasound to determine which estimation of single-point PWV is most valid. The criterion was traditional ECG-gated 2-point (superficial femoral [SF]-posterior tibialis [PT]) PWV. Single-point estimates were calculated at the SF and PT arteries in both supine and seated positions. Single-point PWV was considered valid if the aSEE was <1.0 m·s. Findings show that for both postural positions, the absolute standard error of estimates (aSEE) criterion of <1.0 m·s was not achieved in either the PT or SF arteries using any of the single-point PWV calculations. However, single-point calculations consistently demonstrated the lowest error at the SF artery using PWVβ in both supine (SF aSEE = 1.7 vs. PT 2.7 m·s) and seated (SF aSEE = 1.5 vs. PT 3.0 m·s) positions. All single-point ΔPWV (supine - seated) calculations were higher in sitting, with PWVβ having the closest agreement (ΔSF aSEE 1.7 m·s) to the 2-point criterion. Single-point PWV calculations do not directly reflect regional 2-point PWV. However, they are sensitive to change when moving from supine to seated positions.
Adult, Blood Flow Velocity/physiology, Female, Humans, Leg/blood supply, Male, Pulse Wave Analysis/methods, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Sitting Position, Supine Position, Ultrasonography/methods
157-164
Fryer, Simon
9935c568-e5fc-4b23-a39e-525d9d61da70
Stone, Keeron
d2ca8269-7990-40cd-888d-01ad8c6cfdd1
Zieff, Gabriel
fe0464d5-788b-4f03-b558-f05c4c7179a9
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Credeur, Daniel
82dd8ccb-50ea-4123-a844-c15516578821
Stoner, Lee
fc664371-fcdc-412d-b2c2-1c1ce983b95e
Fryer, Simon
9935c568-e5fc-4b23-a39e-525d9d61da70
Stone, Keeron
d2ca8269-7990-40cd-888d-01ad8c6cfdd1
Zieff, Gabriel
fe0464d5-788b-4f03-b558-f05c4c7179a9
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Credeur, Daniel
82dd8ccb-50ea-4123-a844-c15516578821
Stoner, Lee
fc664371-fcdc-412d-b2c2-1c1ce983b95e
Fryer, Simon, Stone, Keeron, Zieff, Gabriel, Faulkner, James, Credeur, Daniel and Stoner, Lee
(2019)
Validity of single-point assessments for determining leg pulse wave velocity in sitting and supine positions.
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 40 (3), .
(doi:10.1111/cpf.12616).
Abstract
There has been a great deal of interest into the effects of prolonged sitting on lower limb vascular function. However, most studies use flow-mediated dilation which is technically challenging. A simpler technique is pulse wave velocity (PWV) which can be estimated at any single arterial site of interest using a number of different calculations (Bramwell-hill [PWVBH ], β-stiffness index [PWVβ ] and blood flow [PWVBF ]). Findings from this technique would be better inferred if they compare to a standard criterion 2-point PWV assessment. The current study used ultrasound to determine which estimation of single-point PWV is most valid. The criterion was traditional ECG-gated 2-point (superficial femoral [SF]-posterior tibialis [PT]) PWV. Single-point estimates were calculated at the SF and PT arteries in both supine and seated positions. Single-point PWV was considered valid if the aSEE was <1.0 m·s. Findings show that for both postural positions, the absolute standard error of estimates (aSEE) criterion of <1.0 m·s was not achieved in either the PT or SF arteries using any of the single-point PWV calculations. However, single-point calculations consistently demonstrated the lowest error at the SF artery using PWVβ in both supine (SF aSEE = 1.7 vs. PT 2.7 m·s) and seated (SF aSEE = 1.5 vs. PT 3.0 m·s) positions. All single-point ΔPWV (supine - seated) calculations were higher in sitting, with PWVβ having the closest agreement (ΔSF aSEE 1.7 m·s) to the 2-point criterion. Single-point PWV calculations do not directly reflect regional 2-point PWV. However, they are sensitive to change when moving from supine to seated positions.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 December 2019
Additional Information:
© 2020 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords:
Adult, Blood Flow Velocity/physiology, Female, Humans, Leg/blood supply, Male, Pulse Wave Analysis/methods, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Sitting Position, Supine Position, Ultrasonography/methods
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 497925
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497925
ISSN: 1475-0961
PURE UUID: f989f297-3950-49b6-9201-b4e4112a53e1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Feb 2025 17:54
Last modified: 05 Feb 2025 03:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Simon Fryer
Author:
Keeron Stone
Author:
Gabriel Zieff
Author:
James Faulkner
Author:
Daniel Credeur
Author:
Lee Stoner
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics