The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Relationship between parents’ and daughters' self-reported attitudes, protective behaviours and online behaviour in relation to remote-coerced child sexual abuse

Relationship between parents’ and daughters' self-reported attitudes, protective behaviours and online behaviour in relation to remote-coerced child sexual abuse
Relationship between parents’ and daughters' self-reported attitudes, protective behaviours and online behaviour in relation to remote-coerced child sexual abuse
Background: in 2021, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) ran a public awareness campaign aimed at providing parents and 11–13-year-old daughters with the knowledge to build resilience against online groomers who attempt to elicit remote-coerced sexual imagery of children. A parent-child paired response survey was conducted as part of the campaign monitoring.

Objective: the purpose was to use the survey data to investigate the relationship between awareness campaign exposure, parents/carers' self-reported attitudes and protective behaviours and children's self-reported attitudes and online behaviour in relation to remote-coerced child sexual abuse (RCCSA).

Participants and setting: 3132 participants, comprising 1566 parents/carers and 1566 of their daughters aged 11–13.

Method: three surveys were conducted: pre-campaign launch, six weeks into campaign and 12 weeks into campaign. Surveys were completed by parent/carer and child pairs. Correlational and regression analysis was conducted on the aggregated responses.

Findings: viewing more campaign materials was associated with more positive outcomes. However, this did not increase the likelihood that girls would tell someone if they received a request for explicit material. Daughters are more willing to disclose a request for explicit material when they have stronger ties with friends and family and weaker ties with strangers and when parents are open to seeking information and employing multiple strategies to respond.

Conclusions: four recommendations for RCCSA prevention were made: prioritise empowerment models over safety models for children, prioritise talking over strict controlling measures, raise awareness of the full range of motivations and offending types, and tailor interventions to specific audiences.
2950-1938
Lundrigan, Samantha
082e307a-c23f-410a-99fc-ab32c6e88f79
Conway, Paul
765aaaf9-173f-44cf-be9a-c8ffbb51e286
Daly, Ellen
05c8900f-dbc5-4806-9754-c5a7f7b5d1a7
Lundrigan, Samantha
082e307a-c23f-410a-99fc-ab32c6e88f79
Conway, Paul
765aaaf9-173f-44cf-be9a-c8ffbb51e286
Daly, Ellen
05c8900f-dbc5-4806-9754-c5a7f7b5d1a7

Lundrigan, Samantha, Conway, Paul and Daly, Ellen (2025) Relationship between parents’ and daughters' self-reported attitudes, protective behaviours and online behaviour in relation to remote-coerced child sexual abuse. Child Protection and Practice, 4, [100096]. (doi:10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100096).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: in 2021, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) ran a public awareness campaign aimed at providing parents and 11–13-year-old daughters with the knowledge to build resilience against online groomers who attempt to elicit remote-coerced sexual imagery of children. A parent-child paired response survey was conducted as part of the campaign monitoring.

Objective: the purpose was to use the survey data to investigate the relationship between awareness campaign exposure, parents/carers' self-reported attitudes and protective behaviours and children's self-reported attitudes and online behaviour in relation to remote-coerced child sexual abuse (RCCSA).

Participants and setting: 3132 participants, comprising 1566 parents/carers and 1566 of their daughters aged 11–13.

Method: three surveys were conducted: pre-campaign launch, six weeks into campaign and 12 weeks into campaign. Surveys were completed by parent/carer and child pairs. Correlational and regression analysis was conducted on the aggregated responses.

Findings: viewing more campaign materials was associated with more positive outcomes. However, this did not increase the likelihood that girls would tell someone if they received a request for explicit material. Daughters are more willing to disclose a request for explicit material when they have stronger ties with friends and family and weaker ties with strangers and when parents are open to seeking information and employing multiple strategies to respond.

Conclusions: four recommendations for RCCSA prevention were made: prioritise empowerment models over safety models for children, prioritise talking over strict controlling measures, raise awareness of the full range of motivations and offending types, and tailor interventions to specific audiences.

Text
1-s2.0-S2950193825000038-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (716kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 January 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 January 2025
Published date: 13 January 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 498040
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498040
ISSN: 2950-1938
PURE UUID: 45caa6ee-ed4f-42dd-a99d-4d2d3ee8d741
ORCID for Paul Conway: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4649-6008

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Feb 2025 17:40
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Samantha Lundrigan
Author: Paul Conway ORCID iD
Author: Ellen Daly

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×