Robust calibration of shaft and base resistance factors for piles based on multiobjective optimization
Robust calibration of shaft and base resistance factors for piles based on multiobjective optimization
Resistance factors are used to account for the uncertainties associated with pile resistance in load and resistance factor design (LRFD). Current design codes and most previous studies recommend a single resistance factor applied to the total pile resistance (shaft and base resistances). However, the uncertainties associated with shaft and base resistances are significantly different. Moreover, resistance factors are generally calibrated based on the statistics of resistance bias factors derived using all data collected from different sites, whereas the variability of the statistics between various sites (i.e., cross-site variability) has been ignored in the traditional calibration approaches, which may result in the designs based on the calibrated resistance factors violating safety requirements. In this paper, a robust calibration approach is proposed to calibrate shaft and base resistance factors, explicitly considering the cross-site variability in the statistics of resistance bias factors in the calibration process. To achieve that, the feasible robustness concept is adopted to describe the probability that the design remains able to achieve the target reliability index when the statistics of resistance bias factor exhibit cross-site variability. The calibration process is implemented through a multiobjective optimization, which leads to a Pareto front that describes the trade-off relationship between shaft and base resistance factors and feasible robustness. The optimal shaft and base resistance factors are determined using the minimum distance approach. The proposed approach is demonstrated and applied to calibrate shaft and base resistance factors for three design methods, the Vesic, Meyerhof, and Nordlund methods. Results show that resistance factors are significantly affected by design methods and the ratio of shaft and base resistances.
Load and resistance factor design (LRFD), Multiobjective optimization, Pile, Resistance factors
Zhang, Yuting
821b7687-fe98-4525-b641-2ea503797319
Huang, Jinsong
da153fad-3446-47fc-8b4a-5799e42fb59e
Giacomini, Anna
93a2476b-4df9-4d0b-8269-1070776d8f45
Xie, Jiawei
8f5bdf89-fcac-4336-a371-9f138872a28b
Lu, Jianlin
efce3b3d-79ca-43ce-bb6c-06d5b01b973e
1 March 2025
Zhang, Yuting
821b7687-fe98-4525-b641-2ea503797319
Huang, Jinsong
da153fad-3446-47fc-8b4a-5799e42fb59e
Giacomini, Anna
93a2476b-4df9-4d0b-8269-1070776d8f45
Xie, Jiawei
8f5bdf89-fcac-4336-a371-9f138872a28b
Lu, Jianlin
efce3b3d-79ca-43ce-bb6c-06d5b01b973e
Zhang, Yuting, Huang, Jinsong, Giacomini, Anna, Xie, Jiawei and Lu, Jianlin
(2025)
Robust calibration of shaft and base resistance factors for piles based on multiobjective optimization.
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 151 (3), [04024169].
(doi:10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-13007).
Abstract
Resistance factors are used to account for the uncertainties associated with pile resistance in load and resistance factor design (LRFD). Current design codes and most previous studies recommend a single resistance factor applied to the total pile resistance (shaft and base resistances). However, the uncertainties associated with shaft and base resistances are significantly different. Moreover, resistance factors are generally calibrated based on the statistics of resistance bias factors derived using all data collected from different sites, whereas the variability of the statistics between various sites (i.e., cross-site variability) has been ignored in the traditional calibration approaches, which may result in the designs based on the calibrated resistance factors violating safety requirements. In this paper, a robust calibration approach is proposed to calibrate shaft and base resistance factors, explicitly considering the cross-site variability in the statistics of resistance bias factors in the calibration process. To achieve that, the feasible robustness concept is adopted to describe the probability that the design remains able to achieve the target reliability index when the statistics of resistance bias factor exhibit cross-site variability. The calibration process is implemented through a multiobjective optimization, which leads to a Pareto front that describes the trade-off relationship between shaft and base resistance factors and feasible robustness. The optimal shaft and base resistance factors are determined using the minimum distance approach. The proposed approach is demonstrated and applied to calibrate shaft and base resistance factors for three design methods, the Vesic, Meyerhof, and Nordlund methods. Results show that resistance factors are significantly affected by design methods and the ratio of shaft and base resistances.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 December 2024
Published date: 1 March 2025
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
Keywords:
Load and resistance factor design (LRFD), Multiobjective optimization, Pile, Resistance factors
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 498057
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498057
ISSN: 1090-0241
PURE UUID: 771c0185-61f1-423f-abb6-b9662a54cc04
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Feb 2025 18:18
Last modified: 07 Feb 2025 03:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Yuting Zhang
Author:
Jinsong Huang
Author:
Anna Giacomini
Author:
Jiawei Xie
Author:
Jianlin Lu
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics