Differently Eurosceptic: radical right populist parties and their supporters
Differently Eurosceptic: radical right populist parties and their supporters
Since the 2008 crisis, radical right populist (RRP) party positions on European integration have hardened and/or increased in salience. But do their supporters align with them on this? And what role does Euroscepticism play in driving support for these parties? Using data from the ‘euandi’ voting advice application, we examine how close over 8000 RRP supporters in the UK, France, the Netherlands, Austria, Sweden and Belgium were in 2014 to their parties on European integration and, for comparison, immigration. We find that, while they closely aligned on immigration, which remains a stronger predictor of support, they did not on European integration. We conclude, firstly, that increased salience of this issue does not necessarily lead to stronger linkages between parties and voters and that the consequences of positional congruence depend on salience congruence. Secondly, our findings suggest that RRP parties enjoy flexibility on European integration and can shift positions if necessary.
1761-1778
McDonnell, Duncan
e1c7e6ca-12c6-49a7-b2aa-a03e518c4910
Werner, Annika
dcafc9c0-9649-427b-b550-04d03e3c0b24
2 December 2019
McDonnell, Duncan
e1c7e6ca-12c6-49a7-b2aa-a03e518c4910
Werner, Annika
dcafc9c0-9649-427b-b550-04d03e3c0b24
McDonnell, Duncan and Werner, Annika
(2019)
Differently Eurosceptic: radical right populist parties and their supporters.
Journal of European Public Policy, 26 (12), .
(doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1561743).
Abstract
Since the 2008 crisis, radical right populist (RRP) party positions on European integration have hardened and/or increased in salience. But do their supporters align with them on this? And what role does Euroscepticism play in driving support for these parties? Using data from the ‘euandi’ voting advice application, we examine how close over 8000 RRP supporters in the UK, France, the Netherlands, Austria, Sweden and Belgium were in 2014 to their parties on European integration and, for comparison, immigration. We find that, while they closely aligned on immigration, which remains a stronger predictor of support, they did not on European integration. We conclude, firstly, that increased salience of this issue does not necessarily lead to stronger linkages between parties and voters and that the consequences of positional congruence depend on salience congruence. Secondly, our findings suggest that RRP parties enjoy flexibility on European integration and can shift positions if necessary.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 December 2018
Published date: 2 December 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 498093
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498093
ISSN: 1350-1763
PURE UUID: 58d40541-b54e-4c08-afda-e805a7f5a405
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Feb 2025 17:55
Last modified: 08 Feb 2025 03:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Duncan McDonnell
Author:
Annika Werner
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics