The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Voters’ preferences for party representation: Promise-keeping, responsiveness to public opinion or enacting the common good

Voters’ preferences for party representation: Promise-keeping, responsiveness to public opinion or enacting the common good
Voters’ preferences for party representation: Promise-keeping, responsiveness to public opinion or enacting the common good
The functioning of representative democracy is crucially dependent on the representative behaviour of political parties. Large parts of the party representation literature assume that voters expect parties to fulfil the promises of their election programs. What voters actually want from parties, however, remains largely unclear. Within the Australian context, this article investigates the preferences of voters regarding three ideal party representative styles: ‘promise keeping’; ‘focus on public opinion’; and ‘seeking the common good’. Using a novel survey tool, this study finds that voters value promise keeping highly when it is evaluated individually. However, they rate seeking the common good as most important when the three styles are directly compared. A multinomial logistic regression analysis shows that, in particular, voters who have been involved in party grassroots activities prefer promise keeping. These findings have wider implications for our understanding of how representative democracy can and should work.
0192-5121
Werner, Annika
dcafc9c0-9649-427b-b550-04d03e3c0b24
Werner, Annika
dcafc9c0-9649-427b-b550-04d03e3c0b24

Werner, Annika (2019) Voters’ preferences for party representation: Promise-keeping, responsiveness to public opinion or enacting the common good. International Political Science Review, 40 (4). (doi:10.1177/0192512118787430).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The functioning of representative democracy is crucially dependent on the representative behaviour of political parties. Large parts of the party representation literature assume that voters expect parties to fulfil the promises of their election programs. What voters actually want from parties, however, remains largely unclear. Within the Australian context, this article investigates the preferences of voters regarding three ideal party representative styles: ‘promise keeping’; ‘focus on public opinion’; and ‘seeking the common good’. Using a novel survey tool, this study finds that voters value promise keeping highly when it is evaluated individually. However, they rate seeking the common good as most important when the three styles are directly compared. A multinomial logistic regression analysis shows that, in particular, voters who have been involved in party grassroots activities prefer promise keeping. These findings have wider implications for our understanding of how representative democracy can and should work.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 23 August 2018
Published date: 30 September 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 498099
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498099
ISSN: 0192-5121
PURE UUID: 06eebc8c-8df5-4aa6-947c-48d8773b7615
ORCID for Annika Werner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7341-0551

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Feb 2025 18:07
Last modified: 08 Feb 2025 03:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Annika Werner ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×