Carbon ‘known not grown’: reforesting Scotland, advanced measurement technologies, and a new frontier of mitigation deterrence
Carbon ‘known not grown’: reforesting Scotland, advanced measurement technologies, and a new frontier of mitigation deterrence
Drones, lasers and satellites measure forests with seemingly unprecedented detail. In Scotland, private companies are bringing these Advanced Measurement Technologies (AMTs) from ecological science to market. Companies offer landowners the chance to independently measure and verify natural capital commodities, such as woodland carbon credits, using these technologies. Drawing from 61 interviews with stakeholders in the Scottish land sector, alongside six months of ethnographic research, this paper explores the climate governance consequences of high-tech forest carbon measurement. The argument develops from the well-established premise within environmental STS that technologies’ apparent objectivity and impartiality obscures the political-economic motivations shaping their use. In Scotland, AMTs are reflexively developed to generate increased financial value from forest creation schemes. AMTs find more carbon in forests than standard measurement practices allow. Carbon is ‘known not grown’: more numerous and legitimate carbon credits can be created through a shift in knowledge practices rather than a material shift in nature-based carbon sequestration. Three epistemic processes allow for more carbon to be ‘known not grown’. Firstly, more carbon volume can be identified within a forest by using sophisticated measurement techniques. Secondly, conservative carbon estimates can be bypassed because of the perceived precision of AMTs. Thirdly, AMT developers cultivate a situated form of measurement accuracy by drawing upon a selective uptake of science. This paper argues ‘known not grown’ is a novel type of mitigation deterrence. It is a dangerous yet increasingly widespread phenomenon in neoliberal environmental governance and requires further empirical investigation.
Stanley, Theo
b89a2a25-86a1-4cfb-8206-57cc93a8daee
18 November 2023
Stanley, Theo
b89a2a25-86a1-4cfb-8206-57cc93a8daee
Stanley, Theo
(2023)
Carbon ‘known not grown’: reforesting Scotland, advanced measurement technologies, and a new frontier of mitigation deterrence.
Environmental Science and Policy, 151, [103636].
(doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103636).
Abstract
Drones, lasers and satellites measure forests with seemingly unprecedented detail. In Scotland, private companies are bringing these Advanced Measurement Technologies (AMTs) from ecological science to market. Companies offer landowners the chance to independently measure and verify natural capital commodities, such as woodland carbon credits, using these technologies. Drawing from 61 interviews with stakeholders in the Scottish land sector, alongside six months of ethnographic research, this paper explores the climate governance consequences of high-tech forest carbon measurement. The argument develops from the well-established premise within environmental STS that technologies’ apparent objectivity and impartiality obscures the political-economic motivations shaping their use. In Scotland, AMTs are reflexively developed to generate increased financial value from forest creation schemes. AMTs find more carbon in forests than standard measurement practices allow. Carbon is ‘known not grown’: more numerous and legitimate carbon credits can be created through a shift in knowledge practices rather than a material shift in nature-based carbon sequestration. Three epistemic processes allow for more carbon to be ‘known not grown’. Firstly, more carbon volume can be identified within a forest by using sophisticated measurement techniques. Secondly, conservative carbon estimates can be bypassed because of the perceived precision of AMTs. Thirdly, AMT developers cultivate a situated form of measurement accuracy by drawing upon a selective uptake of science. This paper argues ‘known not grown’ is a novel type of mitigation deterrence. It is a dangerous yet increasingly widespread phenomenon in neoliberal environmental governance and requires further empirical investigation.
Text
1-s2.0-S146290112300285X-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 November 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 November 2023
Published date: 18 November 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 498193
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498193
ISSN: 1462-9011
PURE UUID: 732fe5d7-4f45-41c2-aa7f-4da547d3343e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Feb 2025 17:39
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:46
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Theo Stanley
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics