Divided We Fall? Polarization in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
Divided We Fall? Polarization in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
The chapter emphasizes the “supply side polarization” of politics by comparing party policy positions. To develop their analysis, the authors use data from the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP/MARPOR). While in public perception there are huge differences between both parties (and even more, between the candidates), reviewed data do not separate Democrats and Republicans sharply. While the Republicans stayed relatively stable in their conservative ideological supply, Democrats moved back onto the liberal side for the first time after 2000. Hence, this election was indeed more polarized than the elections before. But, in a more long-term perspective, the 2012 election does not stand out as particularly polarized because the polarization of 2012 is smaller than the peak elections of 1964 and the 1980s. In general, cultural (morality, abortion) and social issues (welfare, healthcare) played a strong role in the 2012 election, revealing areas of distinction between the two parties. Additionally, the chapter discusses the influence of the Tea Party and the Occupy movement on the positions of Democrats and Republicans.
85-108
Lacewell, Onawa
1bd52dcb-22ef-40f9-85d8-c0ae5b0abab3
Werner, Annika
dcafc9c0-9649-427b-b550-04d03e3c0b24
8 September 2015
Lacewell, Onawa
1bd52dcb-22ef-40f9-85d8-c0ae5b0abab3
Werner, Annika
dcafc9c0-9649-427b-b550-04d03e3c0b24
Lacewell, Onawa and Werner, Annika
(2015)
Divided We Fall? Polarization in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election.
In,
Bieber, Christoph and Kamps, Klaus
(eds.)
Die US-Präsidentschaftswahl 2012.
Springer, .
(doi:10.1007/978-3-531-19767-8_4).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
The chapter emphasizes the “supply side polarization” of politics by comparing party policy positions. To develop their analysis, the authors use data from the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP/MARPOR). While in public perception there are huge differences between both parties (and even more, between the candidates), reviewed data do not separate Democrats and Republicans sharply. While the Republicans stayed relatively stable in their conservative ideological supply, Democrats moved back onto the liberal side for the first time after 2000. Hence, this election was indeed more polarized than the elections before. But, in a more long-term perspective, the 2012 election does not stand out as particularly polarized because the polarization of 2012 is smaller than the peak elections of 1964 and the 1980s. In general, cultural (morality, abortion) and social issues (welfare, healthcare) played a strong role in the 2012 election, revealing areas of distinction between the two parties. Additionally, the chapter discusses the influence of the Tea Party and the Occupy movement on the positions of Democrats and Republicans.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 8 September 2015
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 498236
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498236
PURE UUID: 5f7e732b-0932-4815-b8d4-da4fff46e168
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Feb 2025 17:50
Last modified: 13 Feb 2025 03:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Onawa Lacewell
Author:
Annika Werner
Editor:
Christoph Bieber
Editor:
Klaus Kamps
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics