Reusable intermittent catheters are acceptable but product innovation is needed an interview study of catheter users’ experiences
Reusable intermittent catheters are acceptable but product innovation is needed an interview study of catheter users’ experiences
Purpose: the purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of intermittent catheter users after using both reusable and single-use catheters, with a particular focus on factors that affected acceptability.
Design: qualitative descriptive study following a clinical trial.
Participants and setting: thirty-six participants who had used both reusable and single-use catheters in a clinical trial were interviewed between June 2022 and March 2024. All were living at home in England or Wales, UK.
Methods: participants were invited to interview following one-year's use of a reusable catheter as part of a clinical trial. The reusable catheter was used in combination with their usual single-use catheter. Semi-structured telephone and video interviews were used to enable participants to describe their experiences. Data were analyzed using inductive methods and framework analysis to develop themes and subthemes.
Results: data analysis identified 4 themes. Successful use of the reusable catheter depended on capacity, confidence and willingness of the individual to adapt. Most people found reuse easier to do at home but there were significant barriers when going out. The design of the catheter used in the trial and the process of reuse did not suit everyone. While there was a desire to continue reuse, this was conditional on the provision of single-use catheters to enable users to mix and match both types in different situations.
Conclusions: this study presents data from participants who were enthusiastic to try reusable catheters, mainly for environmental reasons, as part of a trial. For most there was a desire to mix and match, combining single use and reusable catheters for different situations. Innovation is needed to create a range of reusable catheter designs and cleaning processes that better meet individual needs.
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, England, Equipment Reuse/standards, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Qualitative Research, Wales, Qualitative research, Reuse, Reusable catheter, Intermittent catheter
59-65
Clancy, Bridget
e8c1ebfe-a313-4bf8-878b-de0f5facd8c0
Murphy, Cathy
b7f2dd56-3a8a-412a-9f6a-bf468ce7f749
Avery, Miriam
ad9dda5f-a7da-42dc-8cb7-83a8ca37e6ef
Macaulay, Margaret
505970d3-1e67-4c1f-8291-3a950d336c6b
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Fader, Mandy
c318f942-2ddb-462a-9183-8b678faf7277
1 January 2025
Clancy, Bridget
e8c1ebfe-a313-4bf8-878b-de0f5facd8c0
Murphy, Cathy
b7f2dd56-3a8a-412a-9f6a-bf468ce7f749
Avery, Miriam
ad9dda5f-a7da-42dc-8cb7-83a8ca37e6ef
Macaulay, Margaret
505970d3-1e67-4c1f-8291-3a950d336c6b
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Fader, Mandy
c318f942-2ddb-462a-9183-8b678faf7277
Clancy, Bridget, Murphy, Cathy, Avery, Miriam, Macaulay, Margaret, May, Carl and Fader, Mandy
(2025)
Reusable intermittent catheters are acceptable but product innovation is needed an interview study of catheter users’ experiences.
Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 52 (1), .
(doi:10.1097/WON.0000000000001141).
Abstract
Purpose: the purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of intermittent catheter users after using both reusable and single-use catheters, with a particular focus on factors that affected acceptability.
Design: qualitative descriptive study following a clinical trial.
Participants and setting: thirty-six participants who had used both reusable and single-use catheters in a clinical trial were interviewed between June 2022 and March 2024. All were living at home in England or Wales, UK.
Methods: participants were invited to interview following one-year's use of a reusable catheter as part of a clinical trial. The reusable catheter was used in combination with their usual single-use catheter. Semi-structured telephone and video interviews were used to enable participants to describe their experiences. Data were analyzed using inductive methods and framework analysis to develop themes and subthemes.
Results: data analysis identified 4 themes. Successful use of the reusable catheter depended on capacity, confidence and willingness of the individual to adapt. Most people found reuse easier to do at home but there were significant barriers when going out. The design of the catheter used in the trial and the process of reuse did not suit everyone. While there was a desire to continue reuse, this was conditional on the provision of single-use catheters to enable users to mix and match both types in different situations.
Conclusions: this study presents data from participants who were enthusiastic to try reusable catheters, mainly for environmental reasons, as part of a trial. For most there was a desire to mix and match, combining single use and reusable catheters for different situations. Innovation is needed to create a range of reusable catheter designs and cleaning processes that better meet individual needs.
Text
reusable_intermittent_catheters_are_acceptable_but.10
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 1 January 2025
Keywords:
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, England, Equipment Reuse/standards, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Qualitative Research, Wales, Qualitative research, Reuse, Reusable catheter, Intermittent catheter
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 498474
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498474
ISSN: 1528-3976
PURE UUID: eefaab04-6abf-42a4-88a0-da00c622b17d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Feb 2025 18:06
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Bridget Clancy
Author:
Miriam Avery
Author:
Carl May
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics