The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Scientific dating of Pleistocene sites: guidelines for best practice

Scientific dating of Pleistocene sites: guidelines for best practice
Scientific dating of Pleistocene sites: guidelines for best practice
These guidelines provide advice on best practice for the use of scientific dating on Pleistocene sites. They are applicable to all archaeological projects but are aimed primarily at those undertaken as part of the planning process. Pleistocene sites typically produce limited material that is suitable for dating. Some of the methods that can be employed are familiar to those working in later periods (e.g. Radiocarbon Dating), although special considerations for their effective use may apply. Other methods (e.g. The 'Vole Clock') are only used in the Pleistocene.

Historic England’s Curating the Palaeolithic guidance (Historic England 2023,
section 7) outlines the key Pleistocene deposits within which Palaeolithic remains may be found. Many of these deposits are suitable for scientific dating. The selection of appropriate techniques is key, given the available types of datable material: its taphonomic relationship to the archaeological objectives of the project and the expected time-range of the site. Different strands of evidence can be explicitly combined using Bayesian chronological modelling, and the resultant chronologies can be validated, not only by comparison to relative dating from stratigraphy, but also by employing multiple scientific dating techniques.

Above all, it is important to seek expert advice at an early stage in the project, as some of the techniques applicable in this timeframe require onsite sampling by dating specialists. All laboratories will be happy to advise on applying their technique to Pleistocene deposits and will welcome the opportunity to discuss sample selection and potential methods of crosschecking their results.

It is by working together with a range of specialists that you will provide the best chronology possible for your site.
Pleistocene, Archaeology, Palaeolithic, Luminescence, Radiocarbon, Amino Acid Racemisation, Tehprochronology, Biostratigraphy, Palaeomagnetic Dating, Uranium-Thorium dating, Bayesian Modelling, Quaternary, Palaeogeography, Scientific Dating
HEAG0325
Historic England
Grant, Michael
56dae074-d54a-4da8-858a-2bf364a5a550
Marshall, Peter
f4269a18-4d19-44f2-902e-bdc198572f3c
Grant, Michael
56dae074-d54a-4da8-858a-2bf364a5a550
Marshall, Peter
f4269a18-4d19-44f2-902e-bdc198572f3c

Grant, Michael and Marshall, Peter (eds.) (2025) Scientific dating of Pleistocene sites: guidelines for best practice (Historic England advice and guidance publications, HEAG0325) Swindon. Historic England 139pp.

Record type: Monograph (Project Report)

Abstract

These guidelines provide advice on best practice for the use of scientific dating on Pleistocene sites. They are applicable to all archaeological projects but are aimed primarily at those undertaken as part of the planning process. Pleistocene sites typically produce limited material that is suitable for dating. Some of the methods that can be employed are familiar to those working in later periods (e.g. Radiocarbon Dating), although special considerations for their effective use may apply. Other methods (e.g. The 'Vole Clock') are only used in the Pleistocene.

Historic England’s Curating the Palaeolithic guidance (Historic England 2023,
section 7) outlines the key Pleistocene deposits within which Palaeolithic remains may be found. Many of these deposits are suitable for scientific dating. The selection of appropriate techniques is key, given the available types of datable material: its taphonomic relationship to the archaeological objectives of the project and the expected time-range of the site. Different strands of evidence can be explicitly combined using Bayesian chronological modelling, and the resultant chronologies can be validated, not only by comparison to relative dating from stratigraphy, but also by employing multiple scientific dating techniques.

Above all, it is important to seek expert advice at an early stage in the project, as some of the techniques applicable in this timeframe require onsite sampling by dating specialists. All laboratories will be happy to advise on applying their technique to Pleistocene deposits and will welcome the opportunity to discuss sample selection and potential methods of crosschecking their results.

It is by working together with a range of specialists that you will provide the best chronology possible for your site.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 31 January 2025
Keywords: Pleistocene, Archaeology, Palaeolithic, Luminescence, Radiocarbon, Amino Acid Racemisation, Tehprochronology, Biostratigraphy, Palaeomagnetic Dating, Uranium-Thorium dating, Bayesian Modelling, Quaternary, Palaeogeography, Scientific Dating

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 498605
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498605
PURE UUID: e38f087a-7c55-498b-995f-683ae9c574a6
ORCID for Michael Grant: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-6913

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Feb 2025 17:34
Last modified: 25 Feb 2025 02:47

Export record

Contributors

Editor: Michael Grant ORCID iD
Editor: Peter Marshall

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×