Rapid microbiological respiratory point-of-care-testing: a qualitative study with primary care clinicians
Rapid microbiological respiratory point-of-care-testing: a qualitative study with primary care clinicians
Background: rapid microbiological point-of-care tests (POCTRM) present an opportunity to reduce antibiotic exposure and antimicrobial resistance. So far, there is limited understanding of how POCTRM may support clinicians in primary care in the UK and how POCTRMs might be integrated into practice.
Aim: to investigate clinicians’ views on how POCTRM can influence clinical decisions and routine practice, and perspectives on how POCTRM can impact the clinician-patient relationship.
Design and setting: qualitative study embedded in a multi-centre, individually randomised controlled efficacy trial evaluating the use of a multiplex POCTRM for suspected respiratory tract infections in primary care.
Method: individual interviews were conducted with 18 clinicians (n= 9 General Practitioners, 4 Advanced Nurse Practitioners, 1 trainee Advanced Nurse Practitioner, 1 Clinical Pharmacist, 2 Paramedics, 1 Emergency Care Practitioner). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically informed by a realist approach.
Results: POCTRM can guide prescribing decisions when clinicians experience diagnostic uncertainty and support communication with patients to reinforce prescribing decisions. Consequently, the perceived value, and use of, POCTRM varied according to clinicians’ confidence in making prescribing decisions and managing patient expectations and their clinical roles. The costly and time-consuming nature of POCTRM meant that integration of POCTRM into routine practice was considered unlikely at present.
Conclusion: the findings from this study highlight the potential benefits and challenges of integrating POCTRM into routine practice. Clinicians in this study had generally favourable views towards POCTRM. However, further POCTRM training, complementary strategies such as communication skills training and patient education, and clear guidance on implementation should be explored to optimise POCTRM feasibility and outcomes across different primary care
settings.
antibiotics, diagnostics, qualitative research
Clarke, Rebecca
1cd81684-907a-4bef-8a1c-2566c2d07100
Brown, Emily
50befb23-eb32-446b-a5f9-2425c4cb5273
Hay, Alastair
daf3c71f-5e5a-4bee-9bb8-7df67ec2a79f
Mitchell, Paul
bfea7dec-d8f1-40de-8703-d933d6f83799
Ridd, Matthew
2f15120c-d5fa-4f5d-bb86-21356e034df7
Zhu, Liang
59081265-f24c-44d7-903f-10246e4c7882
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
31 December 2024
Clarke, Rebecca
1cd81684-907a-4bef-8a1c-2566c2d07100
Brown, Emily
50befb23-eb32-446b-a5f9-2425c4cb5273
Hay, Alastair
daf3c71f-5e5a-4bee-9bb8-7df67ec2a79f
Mitchell, Paul
bfea7dec-d8f1-40de-8703-d933d6f83799
Ridd, Matthew
2f15120c-d5fa-4f5d-bb86-21356e034df7
Zhu, Liang
59081265-f24c-44d7-903f-10246e4c7882
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Clarke, Rebecca, Brown, Emily, Hay, Alastair, Mitchell, Paul, Ridd, Matthew, Zhu, Liang and Yardley, Lucy
(2024)
Rapid microbiological respiratory point-of-care-testing: a qualitative study with primary care clinicians.
British Journal of General Practice.
(doi:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0413).
Abstract
Background: rapid microbiological point-of-care tests (POCTRM) present an opportunity to reduce antibiotic exposure and antimicrobial resistance. So far, there is limited understanding of how POCTRM may support clinicians in primary care in the UK and how POCTRMs might be integrated into practice.
Aim: to investigate clinicians’ views on how POCTRM can influence clinical decisions and routine practice, and perspectives on how POCTRM can impact the clinician-patient relationship.
Design and setting: qualitative study embedded in a multi-centre, individually randomised controlled efficacy trial evaluating the use of a multiplex POCTRM for suspected respiratory tract infections in primary care.
Method: individual interviews were conducted with 18 clinicians (n= 9 General Practitioners, 4 Advanced Nurse Practitioners, 1 trainee Advanced Nurse Practitioner, 1 Clinical Pharmacist, 2 Paramedics, 1 Emergency Care Practitioner). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically informed by a realist approach.
Results: POCTRM can guide prescribing decisions when clinicians experience diagnostic uncertainty and support communication with patients to reinforce prescribing decisions. Consequently, the perceived value, and use of, POCTRM varied according to clinicians’ confidence in making prescribing decisions and managing patient expectations and their clinical roles. The costly and time-consuming nature of POCTRM meant that integration of POCTRM into routine practice was considered unlikely at present.
Conclusion: the findings from this study highlight the potential benefits and challenges of integrating POCTRM into routine practice. Clinicians in this study had generally favourable views towards POCTRM. However, further POCTRM training, complementary strategies such as communication skills training and patient education, and clear guidance on implementation should be explored to optimise POCTRM feasibility and outcomes across different primary care
settings.
Text
CLARKE_-_2024_-_BJGP_-_Rapid_microbiological_respiratory_point_of_care_testing
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 20 December 2024
Published date: 31 December 2024
Keywords:
antibiotics, diagnostics, qualitative research
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 498632
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498632
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: 64439d6c-17ad-4b4c-9485-5a740650e721
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Feb 2025 17:50
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 01:44
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Rebecca Clarke
Author:
Emily Brown
Author:
Alastair Hay
Author:
Paul Mitchell
Author:
Matthew Ridd
Author:
Liang Zhu
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics