Active surveillance for prostate cancer is a shared journey: the dyadic perspective

Abstract

Active surveillance for prostate cancer monitors disease progression, with a view to actively treat only if progression is evident. Living with an untreated cancer can negatively impact psychological wellbeing. Partners can influence decisions to convert to active treatment in the absence of disease progression, it is, therefore, important to consider partner reactions and responses to prostate cancer treatment options. We explored the experiences of men on active surveillance and their partners and the impact partner feelings, responses and reactions to active surveillance have on the patient. Semi-structured personal communication were conducted with nine male–female couples (n = 18). All male participants were on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Data was analysed using an adapted version of the Collaco et al. (2021) Framework Method for dyadic data analysis. Dyads function as an interconnected unit with interlinked emotional responses. Differing feelings about active surveillance within the couple were common; men prioritised avoidance of active treatment side effects, partners prioritised minimising the chance of disease progression. Partner inclusion is important, but they sometimes felt excluded by their partners and/or health care professionals. More support is needed for this population. Dyadic support is bidirectional and complex with partners often less comfortable with active surveillance than their partners. More research is needed to explore how partners can be better included and supported.

More information

Identifiers

ORCID for Stephanie Hughes: orcid.org/0000-0003-4801-8245

ORCID for Hazel Everitt: orcid.org/0000-0001-7362-8403

ORCID for Beth Stuart: orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-7437

ORCID for Rebecca Band: orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-1708

Catalogue record

Export record

Altmetrics