Selection effects for inequalities in early childhood education: addressing an evidence gap in quantitative research
Selection effects for inequalities in early childhood education: addressing an evidence gap in quantitative research
Research aims: this paper addresses how quantitative research excludes evidence about inequalities in Early Childhood Education (ECE) linked to selection effects (who goes where, gets what, and how much). It presents two empirical examples to illustrate how addressing this gap can enhance research-informed ECE policy-making.
Relationship to previous research works: the study extends the concepts of ‘selection effects in education’ (Hall, Palardy & Malmberg, 2024) and ‘airbag moderation’ (Hall et al., 2020) to ECE policy-making.
Theoretical and conceptual framework: the study blends developmental and educational theories, including Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory, Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, Piagetian cognitive theories, and Heckman’s returns on investment. The conceptual framework operationalises these theories via variables like ECE quality, family socioeconomic status and children's cognitive outcomes. Selection effects for inequalities are operationalised via the hypothesis of airbag moderation.
Paradigm, methodology and methods: using a post-positivist paradigm, the study employs quantitative longitudinal research designs. Secondary data from two UK studies (EPPE and FCCC) were analysed using the Mplus software.
Ethical considerations: using pre-anonymised public data mitigated privacy concerns. The analyses adhered to data-use agreements, with all inputs and outputs available upon request.
Main finding or discussion: findings reveal previously unexamined selection effects for educational inequalities. Within the EPPE data, ‘Black Caribbean’ children were more likely to experience inclusive practices in ECE settings with the result of a narrowing in ethnic differences concerning preschoolers’ verbal cognition. Within the FCCC data, higher SES families used ECE for longer hours – a relationship which widened SES gap in preschoolers’ non-verbal cognition.
Implications, practice or policy: better understandings of selection effects in education enables better-informed policies that address inequalities, enhancing the ECE’s effectiveness and inclusivity worldwide.
Quantitative methods, Educational inequalities, Research-informed policy-making, Selection effects in education, Airbag moderation, Early Childhood Education, Early Childhood Education and Care, Preschool, educational equity
Hall, James
29e17a2b-dca0-4b91-be02-2ace4abaa6c4
17 February 2025
Hall, James
29e17a2b-dca0-4b91-be02-2ace4abaa6c4
Hall, James
(2025)
Selection effects for inequalities in early childhood education: addressing an evidence gap in quantitative research.
Annual Conference of the British Early Childhood Education Research Association (BECERA), , Birmingham, United Kingdom.
17 Feb 2025.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Research aims: this paper addresses how quantitative research excludes evidence about inequalities in Early Childhood Education (ECE) linked to selection effects (who goes where, gets what, and how much). It presents two empirical examples to illustrate how addressing this gap can enhance research-informed ECE policy-making.
Relationship to previous research works: the study extends the concepts of ‘selection effects in education’ (Hall, Palardy & Malmberg, 2024) and ‘airbag moderation’ (Hall et al., 2020) to ECE policy-making.
Theoretical and conceptual framework: the study blends developmental and educational theories, including Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory, Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, Piagetian cognitive theories, and Heckman’s returns on investment. The conceptual framework operationalises these theories via variables like ECE quality, family socioeconomic status and children's cognitive outcomes. Selection effects for inequalities are operationalised via the hypothesis of airbag moderation.
Paradigm, methodology and methods: using a post-positivist paradigm, the study employs quantitative longitudinal research designs. Secondary data from two UK studies (EPPE and FCCC) were analysed using the Mplus software.
Ethical considerations: using pre-anonymised public data mitigated privacy concerns. The analyses adhered to data-use agreements, with all inputs and outputs available upon request.
Main finding or discussion: findings reveal previously unexamined selection effects for educational inequalities. Within the EPPE data, ‘Black Caribbean’ children were more likely to experience inclusive practices in ECE settings with the result of a narrowing in ethnic differences concerning preschoolers’ verbal cognition. Within the FCCC data, higher SES families used ECE for longer hours – a relationship which widened SES gap in preschoolers’ non-verbal cognition.
Implications, practice or policy: better understandings of selection effects in education enables better-informed policies that address inequalities, enhancing the ECE’s effectiveness and inclusivity worldwide.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 17 February 2025
Venue - Dates:
Annual Conference of the British Early Childhood Education Research Association (BECERA), , Birmingham, United Kingdom, 2025-02-17 - 2025-02-17
Keywords:
Quantitative methods, Educational inequalities, Research-informed policy-making, Selection effects in education, Airbag moderation, Early Childhood Education, Early Childhood Education and Care, Preschool, educational equity
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 498835
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498835
PURE UUID: f9d3b326-449e-419a-baed-22ff67bc802b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Mar 2025 18:13
Last modified: 04 Mar 2025 02:56
Export record
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
