The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Scepticism in the Tractatus and in On Certainty

Scepticism in the Tractatus and in On Certainty
Scepticism in the Tractatus and in On Certainty
Contrary to Moore, Wittgenstein does not believe that a ‘theoretical’ sceptical doubt can be ‘refuted’ – i.e., proven to be false, as it also cannot be proven to be true. Interestingly, this is an idea that Wittgenstein never really changed his mind about, as already in the Tractatus we find him say: ‘Scepticism is not irrefutable, but obviously nonsensical, when it tries to raise doubts where no questions can be asked.’ In this contribution, I will explain why Wittgenstein thinks that scepticism is ‘obviously nonsensical’ and what light this can throw on the anti-sceptical strategy that Wittgenstein develops later in On Certainty. I conclude by comparing my proposal to two others in the literature (Moyal-Sharrock’s and Williams’).
2191-8449
De Gruyter
Schönbaumsfeld, Genia
586652b5-20da-47cf-9719-4fc587dfa4e8
Ramharter-Heinrich, Esther
Pichler, Alois
Stadler, Friedrich
Schönbaumsfeld, Genia
586652b5-20da-47cf-9719-4fc587dfa4e8
Ramharter-Heinrich, Esther
Pichler, Alois
Stadler, Friedrich

Schönbaumsfeld, Genia (2025) Scepticism in the Tractatus and in On Certainty. In, Ramharter-Heinrich, Esther, Pichler, Alois and Stadler, Friedrich (eds.) 100 Years of <i>Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus</i> - 70 Years after Wittgenstein’s Death. (Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society – New Series, 30) De Gruyter.

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Contrary to Moore, Wittgenstein does not believe that a ‘theoretical’ sceptical doubt can be ‘refuted’ – i.e., proven to be false, as it also cannot be proven to be true. Interestingly, this is an idea that Wittgenstein never really changed his mind about, as already in the Tractatus we find him say: ‘Scepticism is not irrefutable, but obviously nonsensical, when it tries to raise doubts where no questions can be asked.’ In this contribution, I will explain why Wittgenstein thinks that scepticism is ‘obviously nonsensical’ and what light this can throw on the anti-sceptical strategy that Wittgenstein develops later in On Certainty. I conclude by comparing my proposal to two others in the literature (Moyal-Sharrock’s and Williams’).

Text
Scepticism in the Tractatus and On Certainty - Accepted Manuscript
Download (239kB)

More information

Submitted date: 18 April 2024
Accepted/In Press date: 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 April 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 498837
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498837
ISSN: 2191-8449
PURE UUID: 2c694b79-f116-41d0-a705-9aaf066a471f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Mar 2025 18:13
Last modified: 23 Apr 2025 04:01

Export record

Contributors

Editor: Esther Ramharter-Heinrich
Editor: Alois Pichler
Editor: Friedrich Stadler

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×