Evaluating the performance characteristics of pressure monitoring systems
Evaluating the performance characteristics of pressure monitoring systems
Measuring interface pressure is currently used in a variety of settings, e.g., automotive or clinical, to evaluate pressure distribution at support surface interfaces. Commercial pressure sensing arrays are employed to monitor and visualise these pressure distributions to aid mattress or cushion selection by assessing their ability to redistribute the pressure magnitudes over vulnerable areas, e.g., the buttock. These technologies vary in configurations and measurement principles, with manufacturers supplying calibration and specifications. This study evaluated the performance of six commercial pressure sensing arrays, which differed in sensor type, configuration, and spatial resolution. Each system was subjected to mechanical compression loading on a standard cushion using a dual hemispherical ‘buttock shaped’ standard indenter. Pressure parameters were estimated, e.g., contact area, peak pressure index, from the sensing arrays and a comparison between measured and predicted pressure values was performed. The results showed that both contact area and pressures are influenced by the spatial resolution, with higher values associated with systems with the highest resolution. A high variability between systems was observed in the measured pressure, with sensor type driving difference between the observed and the predicted pressures. Further research is needed to establish standards and performance analysis of these technologies.
interface pressure, mechanical test methods, performance characteristics, pressure monitoring systems
Caggiari, Silvia
58f49054-6ca6-429b-b499-49b93357e5ba
Jiang, Liudi
374f2414-51f0-418f-a316-e7db0d6dc4d1
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
11 January 2025
Caggiari, Silvia
58f49054-6ca6-429b-b499-49b93357e5ba
Jiang, Liudi
374f2414-51f0-418f-a316-e7db0d6dc4d1
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Caggiari, Silvia, Jiang, Liudi and Worsley, Peter
(2025)
Evaluating the performance characteristics of pressure monitoring systems.
Sensors, 25 (2), [398].
(doi:10.3390/s25020398).
Abstract
Measuring interface pressure is currently used in a variety of settings, e.g., automotive or clinical, to evaluate pressure distribution at support surface interfaces. Commercial pressure sensing arrays are employed to monitor and visualise these pressure distributions to aid mattress or cushion selection by assessing their ability to redistribute the pressure magnitudes over vulnerable areas, e.g., the buttock. These technologies vary in configurations and measurement principles, with manufacturers supplying calibration and specifications. This study evaluated the performance of six commercial pressure sensing arrays, which differed in sensor type, configuration, and spatial resolution. Each system was subjected to mechanical compression loading on a standard cushion using a dual hemispherical ‘buttock shaped’ standard indenter. Pressure parameters were estimated, e.g., contact area, peak pressure index, from the sensing arrays and a comparison between measured and predicted pressure values was performed. The results showed that both contact area and pressures are influenced by the spatial resolution, with higher values associated with systems with the highest resolution. A high variability between systems was observed in the measured pressure, with sensor type driving difference between the observed and the predicted pressures. Further research is needed to establish standards and performance analysis of these technologies.
Text
sensors-25-00398
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2 January 2025
Published date: 11 January 2025
Keywords:
interface pressure, mechanical test methods, performance characteristics, pressure monitoring systems
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 498850
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498850
ISSN: 1424-8220
PURE UUID: bee8ab39-1952-4041-9e9f-b62ba01f2b10
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Mar 2025 18:21
Last modified: 15 May 2025 02:03
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics