The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Determination of particulate organic carbon (POC) in seawater: The relative methodological importance of artificial gains and losses in two glass-fiber-filter-based techniques

Determination of particulate organic carbon (POC) in seawater: The relative methodological importance of artificial gains and losses in two glass-fiber-filter-based techniques
Determination of particulate organic carbon (POC) in seawater: The relative methodological importance of artificial gains and losses in two glass-fiber-filter-based techniques
Particulate matter in aquatic systems is an important vehicle for the transport of particulate organic carbon (POC). Its accurate measurement is of central importance for the understanding of marine carbon cycling. Previous work has shown that GF/F-filter-based bottle-sample-derived concentration estimates of POC are generally close to or higher than large-volume in-situ-pump-derived values (and in some rare cases in subzero waters are up to two orders of magnitude higher). To further investigate this phenomenon, water samples from the surface and mid-water Northeast Atlantic and the Baltic Sea were analyzed. Our data support a bias of POC concentration estimates caused by adsorption of nitrogen-rich dissolved organic material onto GF/F filters. For surface-ocean samples the mass per unit area of exposed filter and composition of adsorbed material depended on the filtered volume. Amounts of adsorbed OC were enhanced in the surface ocean (typically 0.5 ?mol cm? 2 of exposed filter) as compared to the deep ocean (typically 0.2 ?mol cm? 2 of exposed filter). These dependencies should be taken into account for future POC methodologies. Bottle/pump differences of samples that were not corrected for adsorption were higher in the deep ocean than in the surface ocean. This discrepancy increased in summer. It is shown that POC concentration estimates that were not corrected for adsorption depend not only on the filtered volume, true POC concentration and mass of adsorbed OC, but also on the filter area. However, in all cases we studied, correction for adsorption was important, but not sufficient, to explain bottle/pump differences. Artificial formation of filterable particles and/or processes leading to filterable material being lost from and/or missed by sample-processing procedures must be considered. It can be deduced that the maximum amounts of POC and particulate organic nitrogen (PON) that can be artificially formed per liter of filtered ocean water are 3–4 ?M OC (5–10% of dissolved OC) and 0.2–0.5 ?M ON (2–10% of dissolved ON), respectively. The relative sensitivities of bottle and pump procedures, and of surface- and deep-ocean material, to artificial particle formation and the missing/losing of material are evaluated. As present procedures do not exist to correct for all possible biasing effects due to artificial particle formation and/or miss/loss of filterable material, uncertainties of filtration-based estimates of POC concentrations need further testing. The challenge now is to further constrain the magnitude of the biasing effects that add to the adsorption effect to reduce the uncertainties of estimates of POC concentrations, inventories and fluxes in the ocean.
Particulate organic carbon, Dissolved organic matter, Adsorption, Filtration, Bottles, Pumps, Baltic Sea, Northeast Atlantic
0304-4203
208-228
Turnewitsch, R.
7d9e29ea-1a91-4968-903e-ca32f525b0c6
Springer, B.M.
d1c76a36-4564-4962-b3e7-5f14de394b0c
Kiriakoulakis, K.
d9834ec4-e9a3-4dd3-8226-fe1da2514471
Vilas, J.C.
fab1dd40-eafd-4db2-87de-064f1f262086
Aristegui, J.
f7be75cd-2db5-43c1-9af8-a137ff3fc535
Wolff, G.
da0def70-6400-4cb5-98b3-7238aafb73ba
Peine, F.
a9cbd6a2-bca6-4bbb-83aa-3fbe33d52e7d
Werk, S.
ac7d04e1-9f3e-4622-bdb9-da2978547adb
Graf, G.
0ea5df4f-10f3-4f52-b126-38a067a04949
Waniek, J.J.
749b55a4-c736-4961-a522-37645dd73b45
Turnewitsch, R.
7d9e29ea-1a91-4968-903e-ca32f525b0c6
Springer, B.M.
d1c76a36-4564-4962-b3e7-5f14de394b0c
Kiriakoulakis, K.
d9834ec4-e9a3-4dd3-8226-fe1da2514471
Vilas, J.C.
fab1dd40-eafd-4db2-87de-064f1f262086
Aristegui, J.
f7be75cd-2db5-43c1-9af8-a137ff3fc535
Wolff, G.
da0def70-6400-4cb5-98b3-7238aafb73ba
Peine, F.
a9cbd6a2-bca6-4bbb-83aa-3fbe33d52e7d
Werk, S.
ac7d04e1-9f3e-4622-bdb9-da2978547adb
Graf, G.
0ea5df4f-10f3-4f52-b126-38a067a04949
Waniek, J.J.
749b55a4-c736-4961-a522-37645dd73b45

Turnewitsch, R., Springer, B.M., Kiriakoulakis, K., Vilas, J.C., Aristegui, J., Wolff, G., Peine, F., Werk, S., Graf, G. and Waniek, J.J. (2007) Determination of particulate organic carbon (POC) in seawater: The relative methodological importance of artificial gains and losses in two glass-fiber-filter-based techniques. Marine Chemistry, 105 (3-4), 208-228. (doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2007.01.017).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Particulate matter in aquatic systems is an important vehicle for the transport of particulate organic carbon (POC). Its accurate measurement is of central importance for the understanding of marine carbon cycling. Previous work has shown that GF/F-filter-based bottle-sample-derived concentration estimates of POC are generally close to or higher than large-volume in-situ-pump-derived values (and in some rare cases in subzero waters are up to two orders of magnitude higher). To further investigate this phenomenon, water samples from the surface and mid-water Northeast Atlantic and the Baltic Sea were analyzed. Our data support a bias of POC concentration estimates caused by adsorption of nitrogen-rich dissolved organic material onto GF/F filters. For surface-ocean samples the mass per unit area of exposed filter and composition of adsorbed material depended on the filtered volume. Amounts of adsorbed OC were enhanced in the surface ocean (typically 0.5 ?mol cm? 2 of exposed filter) as compared to the deep ocean (typically 0.2 ?mol cm? 2 of exposed filter). These dependencies should be taken into account for future POC methodologies. Bottle/pump differences of samples that were not corrected for adsorption were higher in the deep ocean than in the surface ocean. This discrepancy increased in summer. It is shown that POC concentration estimates that were not corrected for adsorption depend not only on the filtered volume, true POC concentration and mass of adsorbed OC, but also on the filter area. However, in all cases we studied, correction for adsorption was important, but not sufficient, to explain bottle/pump differences. Artificial formation of filterable particles and/or processes leading to filterable material being lost from and/or missed by sample-processing procedures must be considered. It can be deduced that the maximum amounts of POC and particulate organic nitrogen (PON) that can be artificially formed per liter of filtered ocean water are 3–4 ?M OC (5–10% of dissolved OC) and 0.2–0.5 ?M ON (2–10% of dissolved ON), respectively. The relative sensitivities of bottle and pump procedures, and of surface- and deep-ocean material, to artificial particle formation and the missing/losing of material are evaluated. As present procedures do not exist to correct for all possible biasing effects due to artificial particle formation and/or miss/loss of filterable material, uncertainties of filtration-based estimates of POC concentrations need further testing. The challenge now is to further constrain the magnitude of the biasing effects that add to the adsorption effect to reduce the uncertainties of estimates of POC concentrations, inventories and fluxes in the ocean.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2007
Keywords: Particulate organic carbon, Dissolved organic matter, Adsorption, Filtration, Bottles, Pumps, Baltic Sea, Northeast Atlantic

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 49889
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/49889
ISSN: 0304-4203
PURE UUID: 4778d738-afb5-4e55-87ae-ca9e528b196d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Dec 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R. Turnewitsch
Author: B.M. Springer
Author: K. Kiriakoulakis
Author: J.C. Vilas
Author: J. Aristegui
Author: G. Wolff
Author: F. Peine
Author: S. Werk
Author: G. Graf
Author: J.J. Waniek

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×