The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cases of start-up financing: an analysis of new venture capitalisation structures and patterns

Cases of start-up financing: an analysis of new venture capitalisation structures and patterns
Cases of start-up financing: an analysis of new venture capitalisation structures and patterns

Purpose: This paper seeks to understand the dynamics of new venture financing across 20 business start-ups. Design/methodology/approach: A total of 20 cases were explored, via initial discussions with the founder(s), and follow-up contact to confirm sources of financing acquired during new venture creation. This approach was adopted because of the challenges associated with acquiring full details of start-up financing, and in particular informal forms of new venture financing. Findings: Significant variation in, and scale of, new venture financing was identified. In multiple cases, funding patterns did not tally with established explanations of small business financing. Research limitations/implications: The primary limitation of the analysis is the focus on a small number of individual cases. Although this allowed for more detailed analysis, it does not make the findings applicable across the small business population as a whole. New ventures acquired very different forms of finance, and in different configurations or "bundles", so creating a wide range of start-up financing patterns and overall levels of capitalisation. This suggests that multiple factors influence founder decisions on start-up funding acquisition. It also indicates the wide divergence between highly capitalised and under-capitalised start-ups. Practical implications: Many of the new ventures were started with low levels of capitalisation, which as the literature suggests is a strong determinant of reduced prospects for survival. This suggests a possible "financing deficit", rather than gap, for a proportion of business start-ups. Originality/value: The paper provides an alternative methodology for considering new venture financing, and as a result concludes that standard, rational theories of small business financing may not always hold for new ventures.

28-47
Atherton, Andrew Michael
f9cd4f73-4bd9-4546-803d-0a382be1cd72
Atherton, Andrew Michael
f9cd4f73-4bd9-4546-803d-0a382be1cd72

Atherton, Andrew Michael (2012) Cases of start-up financing: an analysis of new venture capitalisation structures and patterns. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 18 (1), 28-47. (doi:10.1108/13552551211201367).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: This paper seeks to understand the dynamics of new venture financing across 20 business start-ups. Design/methodology/approach: A total of 20 cases were explored, via initial discussions with the founder(s), and follow-up contact to confirm sources of financing acquired during new venture creation. This approach was adopted because of the challenges associated with acquiring full details of start-up financing, and in particular informal forms of new venture financing. Findings: Significant variation in, and scale of, new venture financing was identified. In multiple cases, funding patterns did not tally with established explanations of small business financing. Research limitations/implications: The primary limitation of the analysis is the focus on a small number of individual cases. Although this allowed for more detailed analysis, it does not make the findings applicable across the small business population as a whole. New ventures acquired very different forms of finance, and in different configurations or "bundles", so creating a wide range of start-up financing patterns and overall levels of capitalisation. This suggests that multiple factors influence founder decisions on start-up funding acquisition. It also indicates the wide divergence between highly capitalised and under-capitalised start-ups. Practical implications: Many of the new ventures were started with low levels of capitalisation, which as the literature suggests is a strong determinant of reduced prospects for survival. This suggests a possible "financing deficit", rather than gap, for a proportion of business start-ups. Originality/value: The paper provides an alternative methodology for considering new venture financing, and as a result concludes that standard, rational theories of small business financing may not always hold for new ventures.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2012

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 499070
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499070
PURE UUID: a7145f01-2c9b-4985-b652-af010d380de9
ORCID for Andrew Michael Atherton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2278-1496

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Mar 2025 17:43
Last modified: 08 Mar 2025 03:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew Michael Atherton ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×