Structuring qualitative enquiry in management and organization research: a dialogue on the merits of using software for qualitative data analysis
Structuring qualitative enquiry in management and organization research: a dialogue on the merits of using software for qualitative data analysis
Purpose
– To explore the cases for and against the use of computer‐assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) in qualitative organisation and management research.
Design/methodology/approach
– Reflecting the debate inherent in the questions raised about the use of CAQDAS, a dialogue between the authors is used.
Findings
– There are risks associated with using CAQDAS without considering its underpinning principles and assumptions about data analysis. If these are considered explicitly as part of a research methodology, then CAQDAS may be a valuable analytical tool. If not, there is risk of distortion and bias in results from the use of CAQDAS.
Originality/value
– The paper addresses a commonly posed question for qualitative researchers, in a format and structure that is likely to stimulate further debate.
62-77
Atherton, Andrew Michael
f9cd4f73-4bd9-4546-803d-0a382be1cd72
Elsmore, Peter
b00d127f-b611-49c9-8971-4dc1151335e4
15 May 2007
Atherton, Andrew Michael
f9cd4f73-4bd9-4546-803d-0a382be1cd72
Elsmore, Peter
b00d127f-b611-49c9-8971-4dc1151335e4
Atherton, Andrew Michael and Elsmore, Peter
(2007)
Structuring qualitative enquiry in management and organization research: a dialogue on the merits of using software for qualitative data analysis.
Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 2 (1), .
(doi:10.1108/17465640710749117).
Abstract
Purpose
– To explore the cases for and against the use of computer‐assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) in qualitative organisation and management research.
Design/methodology/approach
– Reflecting the debate inherent in the questions raised about the use of CAQDAS, a dialogue between the authors is used.
Findings
– There are risks associated with using CAQDAS without considering its underpinning principles and assumptions about data analysis. If these are considered explicitly as part of a research methodology, then CAQDAS may be a valuable analytical tool. If not, there is risk of distortion and bias in results from the use of CAQDAS.
Originality/value
– The paper addresses a commonly posed question for qualitative researchers, in a format and structure that is likely to stimulate further debate.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 15 May 2007
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 499077
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499077
PURE UUID: dfbe0468-364e-4101-a176-656b89ba4928
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Mar 2025 17:43
Last modified: 08 Mar 2025 03:07
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Andrew Michael Atherton
Author:
Peter Elsmore
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics