The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Structuring qualitative enquiry in management and organization research: a dialogue on the merits of using software for qualitative data analysis

Structuring qualitative enquiry in management and organization research: a dialogue on the merits of using software for qualitative data analysis
Structuring qualitative enquiry in management and organization research: a dialogue on the merits of using software for qualitative data analysis
Purpose

– To explore the cases for and against the use of computer‐assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) in qualitative organisation and management research.

Design/methodology/approach

– Reflecting the debate inherent in the questions raised about the use of CAQDAS, a dialogue between the authors is used.

Findings

– There are risks associated with using CAQDAS without considering its underpinning principles and assumptions about data analysis. If these are considered explicitly as part of a research methodology, then CAQDAS may be a valuable analytical tool. If not, there is risk of distortion and bias in results from the use of CAQDAS.

Originality/value

– The paper addresses a commonly posed question for qualitative researchers, in a format and structure that is likely to stimulate further debate.
62-77
Atherton, Andrew Michael
f9cd4f73-4bd9-4546-803d-0a382be1cd72
Elsmore, Peter
b00d127f-b611-49c9-8971-4dc1151335e4
Atherton, Andrew Michael
f9cd4f73-4bd9-4546-803d-0a382be1cd72
Elsmore, Peter
b00d127f-b611-49c9-8971-4dc1151335e4

Atherton, Andrew Michael and Elsmore, Peter (2007) Structuring qualitative enquiry in management and organization research: a dialogue on the merits of using software for qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 2 (1), 62-77. (doi:10.1108/17465640710749117).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose

– To explore the cases for and against the use of computer‐assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) in qualitative organisation and management research.

Design/methodology/approach

– Reflecting the debate inherent in the questions raised about the use of CAQDAS, a dialogue between the authors is used.

Findings

– There are risks associated with using CAQDAS without considering its underpinning principles and assumptions about data analysis. If these are considered explicitly as part of a research methodology, then CAQDAS may be a valuable analytical tool. If not, there is risk of distortion and bias in results from the use of CAQDAS.

Originality/value

– The paper addresses a commonly posed question for qualitative researchers, in a format and structure that is likely to stimulate further debate.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 15 May 2007

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 499077
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499077
PURE UUID: dfbe0468-364e-4101-a176-656b89ba4928
ORCID for Andrew Michael Atherton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2278-1496

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Mar 2025 17:43
Last modified: 08 Mar 2025 03:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew Michael Atherton ORCID iD
Author: Peter Elsmore

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×