The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Stance-taking and language choice in #StopEnslavingSaudiWomen: Critical discourse analysis of campaigning discourse on Twitter

Stance-taking and language choice in #StopEnslavingSaudiWomen: Critical discourse analysis of campaigning discourse on Twitter
Stance-taking and language choice in #StopEnslavingSaudiWomen: Critical discourse analysis of campaigning discourse on Twitter
Twitter, with its affordances, offers a rich site to investigate linguistic practices and the sociocultural meanings they carry in the noisy, multilingual and multi-voiced context of social media. The current study aimed to explore how Twitter users use discursive strategies and language choice to express their stances towards the guardianship system in Twitter campaigning hashtag #StopEnslaveSaudiWomen. The study deployed quantitative and qualitative methods in collecting and analysing the tweets while relying on different theories such as stance, language choice, and CMDA models that are integrated within the wider framework of critical discourse analysis. With the support of MAXQDA, 3,162 tweets were analysed following Fairclough’s three dimensional-model.
Twitter users employed various discursive strategies in constructing their stances towards the guardianship system relying on different modes supported by Twitter such as pictures, emojis, videos as well as multilingual texts. The constructed stances were varied in being conservative, liberal, moderate, radical, and traditional representing a range of views on political, religious, social topics. The tweets revealed key themes/ topics that were employed differently by particular groups in English and/ or in Arabic (e.g., the driving ban) to align/ disalign with different groups; and to legitimise, delegitimise their stances and stances of other. Audience was also found to be a significant factor in language choice when taking a stance. The study has contributed to a better understanding of discursive strategies and language choice and how they are reconfigured and interrelated in the online context.
University of Southampton
Alswais, Bdreah Mubarak F
50f47c68-ea3b-4e2f-9659-4c428b43c878
Alswais, Bdreah Mubarak F
50f47c68-ea3b-4e2f-9659-4c428b43c878
Paffey, Darren J
d226edec-b23b-4869-8279-2773f6beec61
Beswick, Jaine
502ef67c-c84e-4037-ba69-45bc65dbf594

Alswais, Bdreah Mubarak F (2025) Stance-taking and language choice in #StopEnslavingSaudiWomen: Critical discourse analysis of campaigning discourse on Twitter. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 201pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Twitter, with its affordances, offers a rich site to investigate linguistic practices and the sociocultural meanings they carry in the noisy, multilingual and multi-voiced context of social media. The current study aimed to explore how Twitter users use discursive strategies and language choice to express their stances towards the guardianship system in Twitter campaigning hashtag #StopEnslaveSaudiWomen. The study deployed quantitative and qualitative methods in collecting and analysing the tweets while relying on different theories such as stance, language choice, and CMDA models that are integrated within the wider framework of critical discourse analysis. With the support of MAXQDA, 3,162 tweets were analysed following Fairclough’s three dimensional-model.
Twitter users employed various discursive strategies in constructing their stances towards the guardianship system relying on different modes supported by Twitter such as pictures, emojis, videos as well as multilingual texts. The constructed stances were varied in being conservative, liberal, moderate, radical, and traditional representing a range of views on political, religious, social topics. The tweets revealed key themes/ topics that were employed differently by particular groups in English and/ or in Arabic (e.g., the driving ban) to align/ disalign with different groups; and to legitimise, delegitimise their stances and stances of other. Audience was also found to be a significant factor in language choice when taking a stance. The study has contributed to a better understanding of discursive strategies and language choice and how they are reconfigured and interrelated in the online context.

Text
Bdreah_thesis-2024-final_draft - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (6MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Ms-Bdreah-Alswais
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: March 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 499148
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499148
PURE UUID: c95c5423-6bac-45ce-8586-00298cdb6e8c
ORCID for Bdreah Mubarak F Alswais: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5809-0107
ORCID for Darren J Paffey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2709-8012
ORCID for Jaine Beswick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-939X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Mar 2025 17:30
Last modified: 03 Jul 2025 04:11

Export record

Contributors

Author: Bdreah Mubarak F Alswais ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Darren J Paffey ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Jaine Beswick ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×