The strategies of party competition: a typology
The strategies of party competition: a typology
This chapter provides a typology of different strategies of party competition, which, inspired by Bonnie Meguid’s work, are defined as dismissive, adversarial and accommodative. It achieves two objectives. First, it aims to facilitate the work of our contributors in Part II of the volume, as they assess how parties (populists or not, newer or more seasoned) relate to one another in different contexts, hence ultimately making it possible for the editors to compare different case studies. Second, it provides a theoretical contribution to the discussion of party competition more generally. We argue that our typology contains several elements of novelty. It can be applied to interactions between all parties, and at different territorial levels of political competition, including local, regional, national and possibly supranational electoral arenas. Moreover, it develops Meguid's categorization by including subcategories, which better capture specific competition strategies. Finally, the strategies identified here can be used both as explanandum and explanans, that is, as dependent and independent variables. Hence hypotheses can be developed to explain why some parties tend to adopt certain strategies when engaging with others.
Albertazzi, D.
3f12117a-1c2c-4b68-81d2-39fb01ec5020
Bonansinga, D.
864692cb-5d6b-4b72-bdbe-4a1fe5d0b6e5
Vampa, D.
9692d899-347b-46e3-984a-d5f767f8c7a2
14 January 2021
Albertazzi, D.
3f12117a-1c2c-4b68-81d2-39fb01ec5020
Bonansinga, D.
864692cb-5d6b-4b72-bdbe-4a1fe5d0b6e5
Vampa, D.
9692d899-347b-46e3-984a-d5f767f8c7a2
Albertazzi, D., Bonansinga, D. and Vampa, D.
(2021)
The strategies of party competition: a typology.
In,
Albertazzi, Daniele and Vampa, Davide
(eds.)
Populism and New Patterns of Political Competition in Western Europe.
1 ed.
Routledge.
(doi:10.4324/9780429429798).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
This chapter provides a typology of different strategies of party competition, which, inspired by Bonnie Meguid’s work, are defined as dismissive, adversarial and accommodative. It achieves two objectives. First, it aims to facilitate the work of our contributors in Part II of the volume, as they assess how parties (populists or not, newer or more seasoned) relate to one another in different contexts, hence ultimately making it possible for the editors to compare different case studies. Second, it provides a theoretical contribution to the discussion of party competition more generally. We argue that our typology contains several elements of novelty. It can be applied to interactions between all parties, and at different territorial levels of political competition, including local, regional, national and possibly supranational electoral arenas. Moreover, it develops Meguid's categorization by including subcategories, which better capture specific competition strategies. Finally, the strategies identified here can be used both as explanandum and explanans, that is, as dependent and independent variables. Hence hypotheses can be developed to explain why some parties tend to adopt certain strategies when engaging with others.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 14 January 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 499154
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499154
PURE UUID: 95a2c5ee-8002-45cf-9dd9-52ba21526203
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Mar 2025 17:32
Last modified: 12 Mar 2025 03:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
D. Albertazzi
Author:
D. Bonansinga
Author:
D. Vampa
Editor:
Daniele Albertazzi
Editor:
Davide Vampa
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics