An empirical spring model for simulating bolt fracture considering uncertainty
An empirical spring model for simulating bolt fracture considering uncertainty
Bolt fracture constitutes a primary failure mode, particularly in partial-strength bolted steel connections, under extreme hazards such as collapse-level earthquakes and progressive collapse scenarios. Simulating bolt damage and fracture is key to studying connections’ ductility and the robustness of steel structures under such hazards. In computational modeling, spring models are commonly used to represent the bolt component. The spring model constitutes a practical alternative to continuum finite element simulations that require refined mesh sizes, large computation power, and lengthy procedures to calibrate ductile fracture material models. An empirical model is proposed to accurately capture carbon steel bolts’ nonlinear response up to failure. The model is built on establishing an empirical relation between the bolt’s plastic elongation and its grade and thread length. This is made feasible through an experimental dataset on bolts assemblies under pure tension. The model can be assigned to axial connectors in finite element simulations, axial springs in mechanical component-based simulations, or employed as part of design procedures. Most importantly, bolt fracture uncertainty is quantified to support reliability and performance-based engineering studies. The model validity is demonstrated through experimental validations at the component and connection scales for different bolt material grades and connection topologies.
532-540
Ding, Zizhou
d2f57f07-1ba2-4fce-8eca-f3cfae32dd6a
Elkady, Ahmed
8e55de89-dff4-4f84-90ed-6af476e328a8
3 July 2024
Ding, Zizhou
d2f57f07-1ba2-4fce-8eca-f3cfae32dd6a
Elkady, Ahmed
8e55de89-dff4-4f84-90ed-6af476e328a8
Ding, Zizhou and Elkady, Ahmed
(2024)
An empirical spring model for simulating bolt fracture considering uncertainty.
Mazzolani, F.M., Piluso, V., Nastri, E. and Formisano, A.
(eds.)
In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas: STESSA 2024.
vol. 1,
Springer Cham.
.
(doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62884-9_46).
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Bolt fracture constitutes a primary failure mode, particularly in partial-strength bolted steel connections, under extreme hazards such as collapse-level earthquakes and progressive collapse scenarios. Simulating bolt damage and fracture is key to studying connections’ ductility and the robustness of steel structures under such hazards. In computational modeling, spring models are commonly used to represent the bolt component. The spring model constitutes a practical alternative to continuum finite element simulations that require refined mesh sizes, large computation power, and lengthy procedures to calibrate ductile fracture material models. An empirical model is proposed to accurately capture carbon steel bolts’ nonlinear response up to failure. The model is built on establishing an empirical relation between the bolt’s plastic elongation and its grade and thread length. This is made feasible through an experimental dataset on bolts assemblies under pure tension. The model can be assigned to axial connectors in finite element simulations, axial springs in mechanical component-based simulations, or employed as part of design procedures. Most importantly, bolt fracture uncertainty is quantified to support reliability and performance-based engineering studies. The model validity is demonstrated through experimental validations at the component and connection scales for different bolt material grades and connection topologies.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 3 July 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 499196
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499196
ISSN: 2366-2557
PURE UUID: 0c1de755-a7f1-4113-9f7f-348b95c8995d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Mar 2025 17:56
Last modified: 12 Mar 2025 02:59
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Zizhou Ding
Editor:
F.M. Mazzolani
Editor:
V. Piluso
Editor:
E. Nastri
Editor:
A. Formisano
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics