The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reference points for assessing significant adverse impacts on deep sea vulnerable marine ecosystems

Reference points for assessing significant adverse impacts on deep sea vulnerable marine ecosystems
Reference points for assessing significant adverse impacts on deep sea vulnerable marine ecosystems
Biodiversity loss due to human activities is a critical issue, particularly in the High Seas where bottom-contact fishing poses a significant threat to Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems (VMEs). Deep sea VMEs, tend to be composed of slow-growing, long-lived benthic organisms such as deep-sea corals and sponges. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has developed guidelines to protect these ecosystems from Significant Adverse Impacts (SAI) caused by bottom trawling activities.
This study focuses on the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Regulatory Area, utilizing fishery-independent surveys and fishing Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) data to map fishing intensity and VME functional type biomass. Seven VME types have been assessed, e.g., large-sized sponges, sea pens, sea-squirts, bryozoans, black corals, large and small gorgonian corals, to determine the risk of impact. Results indicate that sponges, black corals, and large gorgonians are the most sensitive VME types to bottom trawling activities, with significant biomass loss occurring at very low fishing intensities. The study defines bottom trawling biomass impact thresholds for each VME type in the range of 0.12–9.43 km·km−2·yr−1 and 0.01–0.11 km·km−2·yr−1 for upper and lower impact thresholds, respectively. The study determines that rapid losses in VME biomass occurs at bottom trawling intensities of about 0.10 km·km−2·y-1 for fisheries operating in the NAFO Regulatory Area. The study concludes that modest reductions in fishing effort in sensitive areas could substantially mitigate SAI whilst having little or no impact on fishing opportunities. The findings also support the target of protecting at least 60 % to 70 % of VME biomass to likely ensure good seabed status; and the importance of implementing spatial fisheries management measures, such as defining a fishing footprint and establishing fishery closed areas, to protect VMEs.
Benthos, Biomass, Fishing, Impact, Management, Sensitivity, Thresholds
1470-160X
Kenny, Andrew J.
16623c06-d002-4463-9917-4c65d4f7c93c
Pepin, Pierre
765281dc-a2bb-4cfb-b0e8-5068f5d32c1f
Bell, James
368ac314-cf60-4968-a752-fa734fd98e4e
Downie, Anna
8701be1d-7d8d-40cc-aa77-35ff7bda6d84
Kenchington, Ellen
f6dfc7c2-b8d1-42eb-9478-5dfa11340570
Koen-Alonso, Mariano
2fae6344-3a56-42bd-a1f2-995a3e7f6983
Lirette, Camille
4c9f33b2-a7bb-4656-a931-54bd82701347
Barrio Froján, Christopher
4935e7ee-ac0f-41bd-b00b-2c5806561d74
Ollerhead, Neil
342d8444-a7f4-43f1-a7f3-6458d225d4b9
Murillo, F. Javier
0350b01f-d962-43c9-9906-4837d0c00087
Sacau, Mar
30c46527-7234-435d-9515-d6c25319045f
Fuller, Susanna
efe8b38c-bf9f-478e-b8b1-4553ea221794
Diz, Daniela
f2d5ff78-c699-4e9d-ac61-f483fbe4f06f
Kenny, Andrew J.
16623c06-d002-4463-9917-4c65d4f7c93c
Pepin, Pierre
765281dc-a2bb-4cfb-b0e8-5068f5d32c1f
Bell, James
368ac314-cf60-4968-a752-fa734fd98e4e
Downie, Anna
8701be1d-7d8d-40cc-aa77-35ff7bda6d84
Kenchington, Ellen
f6dfc7c2-b8d1-42eb-9478-5dfa11340570
Koen-Alonso, Mariano
2fae6344-3a56-42bd-a1f2-995a3e7f6983
Lirette, Camille
4c9f33b2-a7bb-4656-a931-54bd82701347
Barrio Froján, Christopher
4935e7ee-ac0f-41bd-b00b-2c5806561d74
Ollerhead, Neil
342d8444-a7f4-43f1-a7f3-6458d225d4b9
Murillo, F. Javier
0350b01f-d962-43c9-9906-4837d0c00087
Sacau, Mar
30c46527-7234-435d-9515-d6c25319045f
Fuller, Susanna
efe8b38c-bf9f-478e-b8b1-4553ea221794
Diz, Daniela
f2d5ff78-c699-4e9d-ac61-f483fbe4f06f

Kenny, Andrew J., Pepin, Pierre, Bell, James, Downie, Anna, Kenchington, Ellen, Koen-Alonso, Mariano, Lirette, Camille, Barrio Froján, Christopher, Ollerhead, Neil, Murillo, F. Javier, Sacau, Mar, Fuller, Susanna and Diz, Daniela (2025) Reference points for assessing significant adverse impacts on deep sea vulnerable marine ecosystems. Ecological Indicators, 172, [113296]. (doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113296).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Biodiversity loss due to human activities is a critical issue, particularly in the High Seas where bottom-contact fishing poses a significant threat to Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems (VMEs). Deep sea VMEs, tend to be composed of slow-growing, long-lived benthic organisms such as deep-sea corals and sponges. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has developed guidelines to protect these ecosystems from Significant Adverse Impacts (SAI) caused by bottom trawling activities.
This study focuses on the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Regulatory Area, utilizing fishery-independent surveys and fishing Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) data to map fishing intensity and VME functional type biomass. Seven VME types have been assessed, e.g., large-sized sponges, sea pens, sea-squirts, bryozoans, black corals, large and small gorgonian corals, to determine the risk of impact. Results indicate that sponges, black corals, and large gorgonians are the most sensitive VME types to bottom trawling activities, with significant biomass loss occurring at very low fishing intensities. The study defines bottom trawling biomass impact thresholds for each VME type in the range of 0.12–9.43 km·km−2·yr−1 and 0.01–0.11 km·km−2·yr−1 for upper and lower impact thresholds, respectively. The study determines that rapid losses in VME biomass occurs at bottom trawling intensities of about 0.10 km·km−2·y-1 for fisheries operating in the NAFO Regulatory Area. The study concludes that modest reductions in fishing effort in sensitive areas could substantially mitigate SAI whilst having little or no impact on fishing opportunities. The findings also support the target of protecting at least 60 % to 70 % of VME biomass to likely ensure good seabed status; and the importance of implementing spatial fisheries management measures, such as defining a fishing footprint and establishing fishery closed areas, to protect VMEs.

Text
ssrn-5055721 (1) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (5MB)
Text
1-s2.0-S1470160X25002274-main (1) - Version of Record
Download (9MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 February 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 March 2025
Published date: 1 March 2025
Keywords: Benthos, Biomass, Fishing, Impact, Management, Sensitivity, Thresholds

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 499224
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499224
ISSN: 1470-160X
PURE UUID: b46fee6e-c20e-4c47-9343-15d8d512d411
ORCID for Christopher Barrio Froján: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-5508

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Mar 2025 17:39
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew J. Kenny
Author: Pierre Pepin
Author: James Bell
Author: Anna Downie
Author: Ellen Kenchington
Author: Mariano Koen-Alonso
Author: Camille Lirette
Author: Christopher Barrio Froján ORCID iD
Author: Neil Ollerhead
Author: F. Javier Murillo
Author: Mar Sacau
Author: Susanna Fuller
Author: Daniela Diz

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×