The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: perspectives from committee members

Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: perspectives from committee members
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: perspectives from committee members
Research funding committees play an integral role in the research funding process, consisting of a range of skills, knowledge, and expertise (e.g., professional, and public contributors). Although there is some evidence that has explored the efficiency and effectiveness of funding committees in terms of the funding process, there is a lack of published evidence about the purpose, role, and function of funding committees, from the perspective of committee members.

A subset of survey data from a cohort of six National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) research programmes, exploring the purpose of a funding committee, and the expectations and role of a funding committee member between October 2020 to December 2021. All committee members were eligible to participate in the survey.

Using an inductive approach, 50 completed responses (22.5% response rate) were analysed, focusing on the role of a funding committee member and the functions of a funding committee. Participants highlighted seven key areas for the purpose of a funding committee: prioritising and recommending what research to fund (n=36) and assessment of quality (n=24) being the most common responses. Four areas were considered important to the expectations and role of funding committee members, with reviewing, critically appraising, and discussing applications (n=44); and being fair, objective, and unbiased (n=27) being the most common responses.

The findings offer a unique insight into committee members’ expectations about the role, purpose and function of a funding committee and their contribution to the funding recommendation process. There was high agreement that the purpose and role of committees and their members was to offer expert advice to make fair, impartial decisions on which research should be prioritised. Exploring the purpose, role, and function of funding committees has relevance and importance for funding organisations seeking to enhance and optimise the decision-making practice of funding committees.
Funding committees, expectations, grant applications, peer review, qualitative, research funding, survey, virtual committees
2046-1402
Blatch-Jones, Amanda
21d3cd2d-f34c-493d-a9e5-7e17234ed41d
Boxall, Cherish
62deb102-02d5-4613-bd6c-7f2606367b0a
Meadmore, Katie
4b63707b-4c44-486c-958e-e84645e7ed33
Blatch-Jones, Amanda
21d3cd2d-f34c-493d-a9e5-7e17234ed41d
Boxall, Cherish
62deb102-02d5-4613-bd6c-7f2606367b0a
Meadmore, Katie
4b63707b-4c44-486c-958e-e84645e7ed33

Blatch-Jones, Amanda, Boxall, Cherish and Meadmore, Katie (2024) Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: perspectives from committee members. F1000 Research, 13, [1066]. (doi:10.12688/f1000research.154665.1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Research funding committees play an integral role in the research funding process, consisting of a range of skills, knowledge, and expertise (e.g., professional, and public contributors). Although there is some evidence that has explored the efficiency and effectiveness of funding committees in terms of the funding process, there is a lack of published evidence about the purpose, role, and function of funding committees, from the perspective of committee members.

A subset of survey data from a cohort of six National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) research programmes, exploring the purpose of a funding committee, and the expectations and role of a funding committee member between October 2020 to December 2021. All committee members were eligible to participate in the survey.

Using an inductive approach, 50 completed responses (22.5% response rate) were analysed, focusing on the role of a funding committee member and the functions of a funding committee. Participants highlighted seven key areas for the purpose of a funding committee: prioritising and recommending what research to fund (n=36) and assessment of quality (n=24) being the most common responses. Four areas were considered important to the expectations and role of funding committee members, with reviewing, critically appraising, and discussing applications (n=44); and being fair, objective, and unbiased (n=27) being the most common responses.

The findings offer a unique insight into committee members’ expectations about the role, purpose and function of a funding committee and their contribution to the funding recommendation process. There was high agreement that the purpose and role of committees and their members was to offer expert advice to make fair, impartial decisions on which research should be prioritised. Exploring the purpose, role, and function of funding committees has relevance and importance for funding organisations seeking to enhance and optimise the decision-making practice of funding committees.

Text
afc086e6-7c93-439c-b274-40fee9a52414_f1000res154665 (1) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (531kB)

More information

Published date: 17 September 2024
Additional Information: Copyright: © 2025 Blatch-Jones A et al.
Keywords: Funding committees, expectations, grant applications, peer review, qualitative, research funding, survey, virtual committees

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 499343
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499343
ISSN: 2046-1402
PURE UUID: 63ff8197-85d7-4c37-8440-5d5580681484
ORCID for Cherish Boxall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-233X
ORCID for Katie Meadmore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5378-8370

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Mar 2025 17:52
Last modified: 19 Mar 2025 03:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Amanda Blatch-Jones
Author: Cherish Boxall ORCID iD
Author: Katie Meadmore ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×