Supply and demand side determinants of board gender imbalance: the U.S. evidence
Supply and demand side determinants of board gender imbalance: the U.S. evidence
Women are heavily underrepresented in U.S. boardrooms at a time when many countries are introducing policies such as gender quotas to achieve greater gender balance in boards. To understand why, we examine how successful women are, relative to men, in finding a second board appointment after an initial appointment. We find that women do better than comparable men in terms of the quality, likelihood, and speed of the second appointment. Examining first appointments, we find that women who obtain board seats generally have significantly less leadership and work experience in quoted firms than men, but (after controlling for observable attributes) are appointed at larger firms. Our findings are consistent with underrepresentation of women being more a consequence of supply side factors: in particular, a lack of opportunities for women to rise up the corporate ladder, so that only a small number of exceptionally capable women manage to be on the radar of nomination committees. We find little evidence that boards engage in either taste-based or statistical discrimination against women.
Social Science Research Network
Boyallian, Patricia
e69f85a1-be99-4697-b710-bf4bf8950d33
Dasgupta, Sudipto
02932b0e-02d1-4f1a-927f-aafa0cdae95c
Homroy, Swarnodeep
bf9526ca-76e9-4d1f-8b8e-0be867b684f1
6 February 2020
Boyallian, Patricia
e69f85a1-be99-4697-b710-bf4bf8950d33
Dasgupta, Sudipto
02932b0e-02d1-4f1a-927f-aafa0cdae95c
Homroy, Swarnodeep
bf9526ca-76e9-4d1f-8b8e-0be867b684f1
Boyallian, Patricia, Dasgupta, Sudipto and Homroy, Swarnodeep
(2020)
Supply and demand side determinants of board gender imbalance: the U.S. evidence
Social Science Research Network
66pp.
(doi:10.2139/ssrn.3519048).
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
Women are heavily underrepresented in U.S. boardrooms at a time when many countries are introducing policies such as gender quotas to achieve greater gender balance in boards. To understand why, we examine how successful women are, relative to men, in finding a second board appointment after an initial appointment. We find that women do better than comparable men in terms of the quality, likelihood, and speed of the second appointment. Examining first appointments, we find that women who obtain board seats generally have significantly less leadership and work experience in quoted firms than men, but (after controlling for observable attributes) are appointed at larger firms. Our findings are consistent with underrepresentation of women being more a consequence of supply side factors: in particular, a lack of opportunities for women to rise up the corporate ladder, so that only a small number of exceptionally capable women manage to be on the radar of nomination committees. We find little evidence that boards engage in either taste-based or statistical discrimination against women.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 6 February 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 499356
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499356
PURE UUID: 6cf053bb-f1e4-4f64-b741-93579ff2a5c5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Mar 2025 17:30
Last modified: 26 Apr 2025 02:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Patricia Boyallian
Author:
Sudipto Dasgupta
Author:
Swarnodeep Homroy
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics