Exploring the intersection of cancer, domestic homicide, and domestic abuse-related suicides using domestic homicide reviews
Exploring the intersection of cancer, domestic homicide, and domestic abuse-related suicides using domestic homicide reviews
Purpose: research about the overlap between cancer and domestic abuse (DA) is limited. We analyzed Domestic Homicide Review (DHR) reports from England and Wales where the victim or perpetrator had a cancer diagnosis to investigate the nature of DA in a cancer context, and cancer care and other healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) responses to DA.
Methods: we adopted the READ approach to document analysis: Readying materials (including manually searching reports for the term ‘cancer’); Extracting data; Analyzing data; and Distilling findings (using thematic analysis). We framed results using the social-ecological model of violence.
Results: we retrieved 24 DHR reports, which covered 27 domestic homicides/DA-related suicides. Victims had cancer diagnoses in 15/27 cases, perpetrators in 8/27, and both in 1/27. Three cases involved two homicides. Victims were mostly older (median 67). Most (19/24) domestic homicides/DA-related suicides occurred within 3 years of diagnosis, yet cancer HCPs rarely made explicit contributions to the DHR process. Our qualitative themes explain how: (1) cancer and DA affected each other; (2) professionals missed opportunities to identify and respond to DA (including because cancer masked DA indicators, turning down care and support offers were underrecognized indicators, and care was fragmented and non-holistic with insufficient information-exchange); and (3) cancer diagnoses were under-considered and misunderstood in the DHR process.
Conclusions: since cancer masked DA indicators, professionals working with affected people and families should have a low threshold for concern. More explicit contributions to DHRs by cancer HCPs may improve understanding of this intersection and improve future practice
Domestic violence · Domestic abuse · Family violence · Domestic homicide · Suicide · Cancer · Document analysis, Domestic homicide, Domestic violence, Family violence, Domestic abuse, Suicide, Document analysis, Cancer
Dheensa, Sandi
9a83734a-b6de-49dd-bb31-1daee41c0515
Bracewell, Kelly
5b9d2055-ea3b-43e5-91c9-908ad549f60c
Hepworth, Eleanor
35906f5c-0762-44af-aac6-0033eb012126
Myall, Michelle
0604ba0f-75c2-4783-9afe-aa54bf81513f
Rowlands, James
af22142c-9801-4cc2-8c4a-1e818a47a183
26 February 2025
Dheensa, Sandi
9a83734a-b6de-49dd-bb31-1daee41c0515
Bracewell, Kelly
5b9d2055-ea3b-43e5-91c9-908ad549f60c
Hepworth, Eleanor
35906f5c-0762-44af-aac6-0033eb012126
Myall, Michelle
0604ba0f-75c2-4783-9afe-aa54bf81513f
Rowlands, James
af22142c-9801-4cc2-8c4a-1e818a47a183
Dheensa, Sandi, Bracewell, Kelly, Hepworth, Eleanor, Myall, Michelle and Rowlands, James
(2025)
Exploring the intersection of cancer, domestic homicide, and domestic abuse-related suicides using domestic homicide reviews.
Journal of Family Violence, [100229].
(doi:10.1007/s10896-025-00839-8).
Abstract
Purpose: research about the overlap between cancer and domestic abuse (DA) is limited. We analyzed Domestic Homicide Review (DHR) reports from England and Wales where the victim or perpetrator had a cancer diagnosis to investigate the nature of DA in a cancer context, and cancer care and other healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) responses to DA.
Methods: we adopted the READ approach to document analysis: Readying materials (including manually searching reports for the term ‘cancer’); Extracting data; Analyzing data; and Distilling findings (using thematic analysis). We framed results using the social-ecological model of violence.
Results: we retrieved 24 DHR reports, which covered 27 domestic homicides/DA-related suicides. Victims had cancer diagnoses in 15/27 cases, perpetrators in 8/27, and both in 1/27. Three cases involved two homicides. Victims were mostly older (median 67). Most (19/24) domestic homicides/DA-related suicides occurred within 3 years of diagnosis, yet cancer HCPs rarely made explicit contributions to the DHR process. Our qualitative themes explain how: (1) cancer and DA affected each other; (2) professionals missed opportunities to identify and respond to DA (including because cancer masked DA indicators, turning down care and support offers were underrecognized indicators, and care was fragmented and non-holistic with insufficient information-exchange); and (3) cancer diagnoses were under-considered and misunderstood in the DHR process.
Conclusions: since cancer masked DA indicators, professionals working with affected people and families should have a low threshold for concern. More explicit contributions to DHRs by cancer HCPs may improve understanding of this intersection and improve future practice
Text
s10896-025-00839-8
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 February 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 February 2025
Published date: 26 February 2025
Keywords:
Domestic violence · Domestic abuse · Family violence · Domestic homicide · Suicide · Cancer · Document analysis, Domestic homicide, Domestic violence, Family violence, Domestic abuse, Suicide, Document analysis, Cancer
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 499471
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499471
ISSN: 0885-7482
PURE UUID: 6934ca0c-5f74-4d50-867e-7b9998cabf21
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Mar 2025 18:18
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 01:48
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Sandi Dheensa
Author:
Kelly Bracewell
Author:
Eleanor Hepworth
Author:
James Rowlands
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics