Impact of a comprehensive review template on personalised care in general practice for patients with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation
Impact of a comprehensive review template on personalised care in general practice for patients with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation
Background: primary care is in urgent need of more effective and efficient ways of managing the care of people living with multiple long-term conditions (multimorbidity). Personalised care organised around an individual’s needs and conditions, taking account of individual context and priorities and supporting self-management, may offer an improved approach.
Aim: explore the impact of a computerised template to support personalised care for patients with multiple long-term conditions within the context of routinely applied general practice.
Design and setting: a convergent mixed-methods evaluation design. General practices were recruited from three areas of England: Bristol, Southampton and Staffordshire.
Method: a computerised template for the review of multiple long-term conditions was made available to all general practices subscribing to a commercial template supplier. Implementation practices were supported to conduct personalised multimorbidity reviews. We used routine clinical data from implementation and control practices, a before-and-after patient questionnaire and qualitative interviews with general practice staff and patients to evaluate the impact of the intervention.
Results: thirty-two general practices were recruited of which half were implementation practices. Using the multimorbidity template has potential to improve quality of care and patient benefit with no increase in consultation numbers. Patients received a more complete assessment of their needs with a clearer focus on the problems that matter most to them. Conducting multimorbidity reviews can increase burden on nursing staff and consideration is required to the organisation of reviews and appropriate training for nursing staff.
Conclusion: use of the multimorbidity template needs to be supported by staff training, adequate practice capacity, support for system reorganisation, and attention to incentives to facilitate its benefits.
Coope, Caroline Michaela
49a741e2-7fa0-42e1-b7a8-660cb073afdc
Baker, Dereth June
e9a774e3-660d-4f80-83ae-bffd5d1fb663
Lippiett, Kate
35184a9f-cf3c-49cc-ae6b-7b92f6ead7ee
Scott, Lauren
5b19dd6f-b36a-4139-805d-7ca2f447d0f0
Lippiett, Kate Alice
a64b4ef3-7457-4f8f-8f8c-05d18a0f98a7
Chilcott, Simon
e0ed5212-2f6b-4f7e-8b18-d84ca0ca66d6
Turner, Andrew
deb606b8-c47e-40ee-9007-3eef16721bab
Jinks, Clare
26785dc0-7282-4165-8ce0-42a5a135df78
Portillo, Mari Carmen
f913b5c5-b949-48f2-b1d0-eb7505484d5c
Dziedzic, Krysia
b2fe3d66-6300-4bb8-8a9f-e895fa102603
Mann, Cindy
d269414f-2722-4484-bf71-25522becabb1
Byng, Richard
33c40dc1-57c9-48c0-81b0-84aefed32ad5
Scrimgeour, Grace
0c3d4029-88c0-4d18-a1ad-d81347100d10
Salisbury, Chris
50e9a5a0-c074-4af8-9b1b-e1e8408aae3c
Johnson, Rachel
d17a1d3f-6229-45d4-953b-0043c09011de
Coope, Caroline Michaela
49a741e2-7fa0-42e1-b7a8-660cb073afdc
Baker, Dereth June
e9a774e3-660d-4f80-83ae-bffd5d1fb663
Lippiett, Kate
35184a9f-cf3c-49cc-ae6b-7b92f6ead7ee
Scott, Lauren
5b19dd6f-b36a-4139-805d-7ca2f447d0f0
Lippiett, Kate Alice
a64b4ef3-7457-4f8f-8f8c-05d18a0f98a7
Chilcott, Simon
e0ed5212-2f6b-4f7e-8b18-d84ca0ca66d6
Turner, Andrew
deb606b8-c47e-40ee-9007-3eef16721bab
Jinks, Clare
26785dc0-7282-4165-8ce0-42a5a135df78
Portillo, Mari Carmen
f913b5c5-b949-48f2-b1d0-eb7505484d5c
Dziedzic, Krysia
b2fe3d66-6300-4bb8-8a9f-e895fa102603
Mann, Cindy
d269414f-2722-4484-bf71-25522becabb1
Byng, Richard
33c40dc1-57c9-48c0-81b0-84aefed32ad5
Scrimgeour, Grace
0c3d4029-88c0-4d18-a1ad-d81347100d10
Salisbury, Chris
50e9a5a0-c074-4af8-9b1b-e1e8408aae3c
Johnson, Rachel
d17a1d3f-6229-45d4-953b-0043c09011de
Coope, Caroline Michaela, Baker, Dereth June, Lippiett, Kate, Scott, Lauren, Lippiett, Kate Alice, Chilcott, Simon, Turner, Andrew, Jinks, Clare, Portillo, Mari Carmen, Dziedzic, Krysia, Mann, Cindy, Byng, Richard, Scrimgeour, Grace, Salisbury, Chris and Johnson, Rachel
(2025)
Impact of a comprehensive review template on personalised care in general practice for patients with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation.
BJGP Open.
(In Press)
Abstract
Background: primary care is in urgent need of more effective and efficient ways of managing the care of people living with multiple long-term conditions (multimorbidity). Personalised care organised around an individual’s needs and conditions, taking account of individual context and priorities and supporting self-management, may offer an improved approach.
Aim: explore the impact of a computerised template to support personalised care for patients with multiple long-term conditions within the context of routinely applied general practice.
Design and setting: a convergent mixed-methods evaluation design. General practices were recruited from three areas of England: Bristol, Southampton and Staffordshire.
Method: a computerised template for the review of multiple long-term conditions was made available to all general practices subscribing to a commercial template supplier. Implementation practices were supported to conduct personalised multimorbidity reviews. We used routine clinical data from implementation and control practices, a before-and-after patient questionnaire and qualitative interviews with general practice staff and patients to evaluate the impact of the intervention.
Results: thirty-two general practices were recruited of which half were implementation practices. Using the multimorbidity template has potential to improve quality of care and patient benefit with no increase in consultation numbers. Patients received a more complete assessment of their needs with a clearer focus on the problems that matter most to them. Conducting multimorbidity reviews can increase burden on nursing staff and consideration is required to the organisation of reviews and appropriate training for nursing staff.
Conclusion: use of the multimorbidity template needs to be supported by staff training, adequate practice capacity, support for system reorganisation, and attention to incentives to facilitate its benefits.
Text
PP4M Benefits_CCoope_BJGP Open revisions_v1.3_clean
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
PP4M Title page_Benefits_CCoope_final
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 February 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 499688
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499688
ISSN: 2398-3795
PURE UUID: 3c72e855-f6c1-4a2d-82b6-8e0691111110
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 31 Mar 2025 16:51
Last modified: 01 Apr 2025 01:58
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Caroline Michaela Coope
Author:
Dereth June Baker
Author:
Lauren Scott
Author:
Kate Alice Lippiett
Author:
Simon Chilcott
Author:
Andrew Turner
Author:
Clare Jinks
Author:
Krysia Dziedzic
Author:
Cindy Mann
Author:
Richard Byng
Author:
Grace Scrimgeour
Author:
Chris Salisbury
Author:
Rachel Johnson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics