Resilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in Taiwan
Resilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in Taiwan
Background: this study investigates the relationships between resilience dimensions, coping strategies, and prior disaster experience, focusing on disaster preparedness and avoidance behaviors in Taiwan.
Methods: a total of 550 participants were surveyed, with 57.82% being female and the majority aged between 21 and 40 years. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path analysis, we examined six resilience dimensions, which include problem-solving, social support, negative emotion regulation, stable interpersonal relationships, assertiveness, and self-regulation, as predictors of disaster preparedness and avoidance behaviors.
Results: the models accounted for 41.83-44.83% of the variance in preparedness and 5.43-10.74% of the variance in denial/avoidance. Across all models, problem-solving, assertiveness, and living with family consistently predicted higher preparedness, while income consistently predicted lower denial and avoidance behaviors. Notably, flood experience significantly moderated the relationship between social support and denial/avoidance (β = 0.21, p = .017), indicating that participants with stronger social support who had experienced floods were more likely to engage in denial and avoidance behaviors. Additionally, flood experience negatively moderated the relationship between negative emotion regulation and both preparedness (β = - 0.18, p = .035) and denial/avoidance (β = - 0.23, p = .030), suggesting that individuals with higher emotional regulation were less likely to prepare or deny disaster risks after flood exposure.
Conclusion: these findings highlight the importance of addressing individual resilience capacities and the complexities of prior disaster experiences in disaster preparedness interventions, with particular attention to vulnerable populations.
Coping strategies, Disaster avoidance, Disaster preparedness, Prior disaster experience, Resilience, Taiwan
Wu, Yi Ling
9ee1023a-7e89-4260-9030-5c8b9fb2e1d8
Lin, Tsai Wen
aadfdb93-a0e6-44cb-9a1c-f70ef51489d1
Lam, Jason
2452121a-ca5d-4b3a-8f50-f7523be61c43
Wang, Samuel S.C.
95126c5f-47c7-462a-b267-921f280f5305
Lo, Herman H.M.
d951fdc8-bc43-459f-ba00-682afeb7d7e2
17 January 2025
Wu, Yi Ling
9ee1023a-7e89-4260-9030-5c8b9fb2e1d8
Lin, Tsai Wen
aadfdb93-a0e6-44cb-9a1c-f70ef51489d1
Lam, Jason
2452121a-ca5d-4b3a-8f50-f7523be61c43
Wang, Samuel S.C.
95126c5f-47c7-462a-b267-921f280f5305
Lo, Herman H.M.
d951fdc8-bc43-459f-ba00-682afeb7d7e2
Wu, Yi Ling, Lin, Tsai Wen, Lam, Jason, Wang, Samuel S.C. and Lo, Herman H.M.
(2025)
Resilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in Taiwan.
BMC Public Health, 25 (1), [200].
(doi:10.1186/s12889-025-21361-y).
Abstract
Background: this study investigates the relationships between resilience dimensions, coping strategies, and prior disaster experience, focusing on disaster preparedness and avoidance behaviors in Taiwan.
Methods: a total of 550 participants were surveyed, with 57.82% being female and the majority aged between 21 and 40 years. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path analysis, we examined six resilience dimensions, which include problem-solving, social support, negative emotion regulation, stable interpersonal relationships, assertiveness, and self-regulation, as predictors of disaster preparedness and avoidance behaviors.
Results: the models accounted for 41.83-44.83% of the variance in preparedness and 5.43-10.74% of the variance in denial/avoidance. Across all models, problem-solving, assertiveness, and living with family consistently predicted higher preparedness, while income consistently predicted lower denial and avoidance behaviors. Notably, flood experience significantly moderated the relationship between social support and denial/avoidance (β = 0.21, p = .017), indicating that participants with stronger social support who had experienced floods were more likely to engage in denial and avoidance behaviors. Additionally, flood experience negatively moderated the relationship between negative emotion regulation and both preparedness (β = - 0.18, p = .035) and denial/avoidance (β = - 0.23, p = .030), suggesting that individuals with higher emotional regulation were less likely to prepare or deny disaster risks after flood exposure.
Conclusion: these findings highlight the importance of addressing individual resilience capacities and the complexities of prior disaster experiences in disaster preparedness interventions, with particular attention to vulnerable populations.
Text
s12889-025-21361-y
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 7 January 2025
Published date: 17 January 2025
Keywords:
Coping strategies, Disaster avoidance, Disaster preparedness, Prior disaster experience, Resilience, Taiwan
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 499704
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499704
ISSN: 1471-2458
PURE UUID: 4988b407-9b8f-44b8-845a-813c737655e4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Apr 2025 16:34
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tsai Wen Lin
Author:
Jason Lam
Author:
Samuel S.C. Wang
Author:
Herman H.M. Lo
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics