The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments (ORANGE Segments): a multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial

Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments (ORANGE Segments): a multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial
Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments (ORANGE Segments): a multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial

Background: an increasing number of liver resections are performed laparoscopically, while laparoscopic resection of lesions in the posterosuperior segments is technically challenging. We aimed to assess the outcomes of laparoscopic and open parenchymal preserving resection of lesions in the posterosuperior segments in a randomised controlled trial.

Methods: in this multicentre, patient-blinded, superiority randomised controlled trial, patients requiring parenchymal preserving liver resection for tumours in segment 4a, 7, or 8 were enrolled at 17 centres and randomised 1:1 to laparoscopic or open surgery using a minimisation scheme stratifying for centre and lesion size. The primary endpoint was time to functional recovery measured in postoperative days. To detect a difference in time to functional recovery of two days the sample size needed 250 patients, an interim analysis was planned with 125 patients. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded to the allocation. The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03270917.

Findings: between November 2017 and November 2021, 251 patients were randomised to laparoscopic (n = 125) or open (n = 126) surgery. The majority of patients had a preoperative diagnosis of cancer (225/246 = 91.5%). Time to functional recovery was 3 days (IQR 3–5) in the laparoscopic group compared to 4 days (IQR 3–5) in the open group (difference −19.2%, 96% CI −28.8% to −8.4%; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was similarly shorter in the laparoscopic group (4 days, IQR 3–5 versus 5 days, IQR 4–7; p < 0.001). There were three deaths in the laparoscopic group (3/122 = 2.5%) and one in the open group (1/124 = 0.8%) within 90 days of resection (p = 0.336). Overall postoperative morbidity, severe morbidity, liver-specific morbidity, and readmission were not statistically significant different between the groups. The radical resection (R0) rate in patients with cancer was comparable (laparoscopic 93/106 = 87.7% versus open 97/113 = 85.8%, p = 0.539). 

Interpretation: for patients with lesions in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, laparoscopic surgery, as compared to open surgery, reduces time to functional recovery. However, this reduction in time to functional recovery did not meet the hypothesized difference in time to functional recovery of two days.

Funding: this investigator-initiated trial was funded by Ethicon ( Johnson & Johnson), Cancer Research United Kingdom, and Maastricht University Medical Centre+.

Hepatectomy, Laparoscopic liver resection, Liver neoplasms, Open liver resection
2666-7762
Sijberden, Jasper P.
9d954519-5768-4cc9-a6c4-2cb3a051a212
Kuemmerli, Christoph
85b9f630-6845-4b8a-bbd7-76ace58cebfb
Ratti, Francesca
6ee4b291-99b0-48c7-b983-6f0f9e14d90d
D'Hondt, Mathieu
dad5077e-c50f-45dc-a433-f5e327566bb6
Sutcliffe, Robert P.
53a0327d-e30f-4bf9-a284-986a82268276
Troisi, Roberto I.
13220f60-fb66-44c5-b957-0f9a5936b0c7
Efanov, Mikhail
ceefe17f-20c9-4add-837c-0d9a3edca254
Fichtinger, Robert S.
055adb24-2b61-43e7-b4f5-a934d573aedb
Díaz-Nieto, Rafael
d2ca8448-b3ea-4fe9-b432-2e23e3f160c3
Ettorre, Giuseppe M.
cc13268d-f8dd-4fa1-991d-2227fe23805d
Sheen, Aali J.
345305f5-07e3-450b-84be-206a1bcc98c6
Menon, Krishna V.
d07aeb0b-4e37-4f9a-b23c-55d5d35fa535
Besselink, Marc G.
5161301c-7dd8-4806-ad35-b721762506ae
Soonawalla, Zahir
ecf14061-123f-4afe-9a01-1c65b0ac6444
Aroori, Somaiah
842a95b8-42fb-462d-85a7-faeefd6ecea0
Marino, Rebecca
c3f97c48-ff6a-41eb-b44e-17e3c652d58a
De Meyere, Celine
549a67ce-5710-4589-b434-60dae9f55e0c
Marudanayagam, Ravi
82602f42-5ef6-4f04-a166-c85ce3bd4d23
Zimmitti, Giuseppe
58cb17a9-1aa4-40b0-b04c-6c8b8687f0e6
Olij, Bram
7addf0b3-df3a-44d0-8e15-bb5105fb20ec
Eminton, Zina
44904d98-97be-4080-9a84-bf5742525f8e
Brandts, Lloyd
b4e4d995-9b05-4659-ba6f-aaae93adc1d4
Ferrari, Clarissa
8aab3a17-4448-435b-9c60-264f8a6fad19
M. van Dam, Ronald
0cbc1956-0b43-4089-9d2e-9f3e66829ce5
Aldrighetti, Luca A.
a4b19d20-4a6e-4b98-9267-f76edcd689a0
Pugh, Siân
e0d0bdb3-f772-48b2-84bd-fb25045bef94
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Abu Hilal, Mohammed
8c6d0daa-a590-4bb3-b634-1caf71a1ae60
et al.
Sijberden, Jasper P.
9d954519-5768-4cc9-a6c4-2cb3a051a212
Kuemmerli, Christoph
85b9f630-6845-4b8a-bbd7-76ace58cebfb
Ratti, Francesca
6ee4b291-99b0-48c7-b983-6f0f9e14d90d
D'Hondt, Mathieu
dad5077e-c50f-45dc-a433-f5e327566bb6
Sutcliffe, Robert P.
53a0327d-e30f-4bf9-a284-986a82268276
Troisi, Roberto I.
13220f60-fb66-44c5-b957-0f9a5936b0c7
Efanov, Mikhail
ceefe17f-20c9-4add-837c-0d9a3edca254
Fichtinger, Robert S.
055adb24-2b61-43e7-b4f5-a934d573aedb
Díaz-Nieto, Rafael
d2ca8448-b3ea-4fe9-b432-2e23e3f160c3
Ettorre, Giuseppe M.
cc13268d-f8dd-4fa1-991d-2227fe23805d
Sheen, Aali J.
345305f5-07e3-450b-84be-206a1bcc98c6
Menon, Krishna V.
d07aeb0b-4e37-4f9a-b23c-55d5d35fa535
Besselink, Marc G.
5161301c-7dd8-4806-ad35-b721762506ae
Soonawalla, Zahir
ecf14061-123f-4afe-9a01-1c65b0ac6444
Aroori, Somaiah
842a95b8-42fb-462d-85a7-faeefd6ecea0
Marino, Rebecca
c3f97c48-ff6a-41eb-b44e-17e3c652d58a
De Meyere, Celine
549a67ce-5710-4589-b434-60dae9f55e0c
Marudanayagam, Ravi
82602f42-5ef6-4f04-a166-c85ce3bd4d23
Zimmitti, Giuseppe
58cb17a9-1aa4-40b0-b04c-6c8b8687f0e6
Olij, Bram
7addf0b3-df3a-44d0-8e15-bb5105fb20ec
Eminton, Zina
44904d98-97be-4080-9a84-bf5742525f8e
Brandts, Lloyd
b4e4d995-9b05-4659-ba6f-aaae93adc1d4
Ferrari, Clarissa
8aab3a17-4448-435b-9c60-264f8a6fad19
M. van Dam, Ronald
0cbc1956-0b43-4089-9d2e-9f3e66829ce5
Aldrighetti, Luca A.
a4b19d20-4a6e-4b98-9267-f76edcd689a0
Pugh, Siân
e0d0bdb3-f772-48b2-84bd-fb25045bef94
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Abu Hilal, Mohammed
8c6d0daa-a590-4bb3-b634-1caf71a1ae60

Sijberden, Jasper P., Kuemmerli, Christoph and Ratti, Francesca , et al. (2025) Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments (ORANGE Segments): a multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe, 51, [101228]. (doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101228).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: an increasing number of liver resections are performed laparoscopically, while laparoscopic resection of lesions in the posterosuperior segments is technically challenging. We aimed to assess the outcomes of laparoscopic and open parenchymal preserving resection of lesions in the posterosuperior segments in a randomised controlled trial.

Methods: in this multicentre, patient-blinded, superiority randomised controlled trial, patients requiring parenchymal preserving liver resection for tumours in segment 4a, 7, or 8 were enrolled at 17 centres and randomised 1:1 to laparoscopic or open surgery using a minimisation scheme stratifying for centre and lesion size. The primary endpoint was time to functional recovery measured in postoperative days. To detect a difference in time to functional recovery of two days the sample size needed 250 patients, an interim analysis was planned with 125 patients. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded to the allocation. The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03270917.

Findings: between November 2017 and November 2021, 251 patients were randomised to laparoscopic (n = 125) or open (n = 126) surgery. The majority of patients had a preoperative diagnosis of cancer (225/246 = 91.5%). Time to functional recovery was 3 days (IQR 3–5) in the laparoscopic group compared to 4 days (IQR 3–5) in the open group (difference −19.2%, 96% CI −28.8% to −8.4%; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was similarly shorter in the laparoscopic group (4 days, IQR 3–5 versus 5 days, IQR 4–7; p < 0.001). There were three deaths in the laparoscopic group (3/122 = 2.5%) and one in the open group (1/124 = 0.8%) within 90 days of resection (p = 0.336). Overall postoperative morbidity, severe morbidity, liver-specific morbidity, and readmission were not statistically significant different between the groups. The radical resection (R0) rate in patients with cancer was comparable (laparoscopic 93/106 = 87.7% versus open 97/113 = 85.8%, p = 0.539). 

Interpretation: for patients with lesions in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, laparoscopic surgery, as compared to open surgery, reduces time to functional recovery. However, this reduction in time to functional recovery did not meet the hypothesized difference in time to functional recovery of two days.

Funding: this investigator-initiated trial was funded by Ethicon ( Johnson & Johnson), Cancer Research United Kingdom, and Maastricht University Medical Centre+.

Text
1-s2.0-S2666776225000201-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 January 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 February 2025
Published date: 20 February 2025
Keywords: Hepatectomy, Laparoscopic liver resection, Liver neoplasms, Open liver resection

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 499711
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499711
ISSN: 2666-7762
PURE UUID: d997b696-3217-4dc8-89ff-c0c4abcace24
ORCID for John N. Primrose: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7605

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Apr 2025 16:37
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 01:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jasper P. Sijberden
Author: Christoph Kuemmerli
Author: Francesca Ratti
Author: Mathieu D'Hondt
Author: Robert P. Sutcliffe
Author: Roberto I. Troisi
Author: Mikhail Efanov
Author: Robert S. Fichtinger
Author: Rafael Díaz-Nieto
Author: Giuseppe M. Ettorre
Author: Aali J. Sheen
Author: Krishna V. Menon
Author: Marc G. Besselink
Author: Zahir Soonawalla
Author: Somaiah Aroori
Author: Rebecca Marino
Author: Celine De Meyere
Author: Ravi Marudanayagam
Author: Giuseppe Zimmitti
Author: Bram Olij
Author: Zina Eminton
Author: Lloyd Brandts
Author: Clarissa Ferrari
Author: Ronald M. van Dam
Author: Luca A. Aldrighetti
Author: Siân Pugh
Author: Mohammed Abu Hilal
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×