The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

PTH1 receptor agonists for fracture risk: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

PTH1 receptor agonists for fracture risk: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
PTH1 receptor agonists for fracture risk: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Osteoporosis, defined by reduced bone mineral density and macro- and micro-architectural degradation, leads to increased fracture risk, particularly in aging populations. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate that PTH1 receptor agonists, teriparatide and abaloparatide, are effective at reducing fracture risk, real-world evidence (RWE) remains sparse. This study reviews and compares the anti-fracture efficacy of these agents, against each other and against other osteoporosis treatments using both RCTs and RWE. We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane up to May 2024, focusing on RCTs and RWE studies reporting reduction in vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, or all fractures as primary endpoint. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted, first through pairwise meta-analyses of teriparatide versus abaloparatide, then a Bayesian NMA comparing each to other treatments. Safety assessments included adverse events classified by MedDRA, with a particular attention to hypercalcemia and cardiac events. Seventeen studies (11 RCTs, 6 RWE) met inclusion criteria. Teriparatide and abaloparatide were effective in reducing vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in all pairwise meta-analyses versus placebo. Abaloparatide showed an advantage over teriparatide for non-vertebral fractures (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80-0.95) and hip fractures (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71-0.93). In the NMA model, teriparatide and abaloparatide were superior to placebo, raloxifene, and calcitonin in reducing vertebral fracture while teriparatide was further superior to denosumab and risedronate. For non-vertebral fracture, abaloparatide was better than any other treatment while teriparatide was only superior to alendronate or placebo. PTH1 analogs were better than placebo at reducing all fractures while no difference was observed for the risk of hip fracture. Both abaloparatide and teriparatide demonstrate comparable safety to other osteoporosis treatments, with no increased cardiovascular risk. This review highlights that PTH1 receptor agonists effectively reduce fracture risk, with abaloparatide offering enhanced benefits for non-vertebral and hip fractures compared to teriparatide. Both agents exhibit acceptable safety profiles, suggesting their valuable role in managing osteoporosis, particularly for high-risk patients.

Abaloparatide, Fractures, MACE, Network meta-analysis, Osteoporosis, PTH-1 receptor agonists, Randomized controlled trials, Real-world evidence studies, Safety, Teriparatide
0937-941X
951-967
Beaudart, Charlotte
bdc9da98-791a-474b-9745-be0695a4d8a9
Veronese, Nicola
a9a97f63-a828-45a3-bae0-68182c5a44fd
Douxfils, Jonathan
945682cf-359b-4988-baff-62bb0080e8d4
Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli
3f543bed-c612-4b87-847d-85ded231aa07
Bolzetta, Francesco
de61bd39-4f3d-4fa2-ac70-6ce638f5caa9
Albanese, Paolo
adb1b57e-fc69-4518-8b28-ce4a483b38c8
Voltan, Gianpaolo
28473814-aaba-4d37-89f7-42a637c61510
Alokail, Majed
9adf2d61-d9f7-4095-bc36-701f0680646a
Harvey, Nicholas C.
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Fuggle, Nicholas R.
8e41e935-e6ec-4bb4-b854-4d39574fe3e2
Rizzoli, René
7c269f5d-329c-4153-9082-951c77a4d8f8
Reginster, Jean-Yves
33684a35-87f7-4b8d-bb91-4da2b809f855
Beaudart, Charlotte
bdc9da98-791a-474b-9745-be0695a4d8a9
Veronese, Nicola
a9a97f63-a828-45a3-bae0-68182c5a44fd
Douxfils, Jonathan
945682cf-359b-4988-baff-62bb0080e8d4
Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli
3f543bed-c612-4b87-847d-85ded231aa07
Bolzetta, Francesco
de61bd39-4f3d-4fa2-ac70-6ce638f5caa9
Albanese, Paolo
adb1b57e-fc69-4518-8b28-ce4a483b38c8
Voltan, Gianpaolo
28473814-aaba-4d37-89f7-42a637c61510
Alokail, Majed
9adf2d61-d9f7-4095-bc36-701f0680646a
Harvey, Nicholas C.
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Fuggle, Nicholas R.
8e41e935-e6ec-4bb4-b854-4d39574fe3e2
Rizzoli, René
7c269f5d-329c-4153-9082-951c77a4d8f8
Reginster, Jean-Yves
33684a35-87f7-4b8d-bb91-4da2b809f855

Beaudart, Charlotte, Veronese, Nicola, Douxfils, Jonathan, Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli, Bolzetta, Francesco, Albanese, Paolo, Voltan, Gianpaolo, Alokail, Majed, Harvey, Nicholas C., Fuggle, Nicholas R., Rizzoli, René and Reginster, Jean-Yves (2025) PTH1 receptor agonists for fracture risk: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International, 36 (6), 951-967. (doi:10.1007/s00198-025-07440-1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Osteoporosis, defined by reduced bone mineral density and macro- and micro-architectural degradation, leads to increased fracture risk, particularly in aging populations. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate that PTH1 receptor agonists, teriparatide and abaloparatide, are effective at reducing fracture risk, real-world evidence (RWE) remains sparse. This study reviews and compares the anti-fracture efficacy of these agents, against each other and against other osteoporosis treatments using both RCTs and RWE. We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane up to May 2024, focusing on RCTs and RWE studies reporting reduction in vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, or all fractures as primary endpoint. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted, first through pairwise meta-analyses of teriparatide versus abaloparatide, then a Bayesian NMA comparing each to other treatments. Safety assessments included adverse events classified by MedDRA, with a particular attention to hypercalcemia and cardiac events. Seventeen studies (11 RCTs, 6 RWE) met inclusion criteria. Teriparatide and abaloparatide were effective in reducing vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in all pairwise meta-analyses versus placebo. Abaloparatide showed an advantage over teriparatide for non-vertebral fractures (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80-0.95) and hip fractures (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71-0.93). In the NMA model, teriparatide and abaloparatide were superior to placebo, raloxifene, and calcitonin in reducing vertebral fracture while teriparatide was further superior to denosumab and risedronate. For non-vertebral fracture, abaloparatide was better than any other treatment while teriparatide was only superior to alendronate or placebo. PTH1 analogs were better than placebo at reducing all fractures while no difference was observed for the risk of hip fracture. Both abaloparatide and teriparatide demonstrate comparable safety to other osteoporosis treatments, with no increased cardiovascular risk. This review highlights that PTH1 receptor agonists effectively reduce fracture risk, with abaloparatide offering enhanced benefits for non-vertebral and hip fractures compared to teriparatide. Both agents exhibit acceptable safety profiles, suggesting their valuable role in managing osteoporosis, particularly for high-risk patients.

Text
s00198-025-07440-1 - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 February 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 March 2025
Published date: June 2025
Additional Information: A correction to this research output can be found at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-025-07452-x
Keywords: Abaloparatide, Fractures, MACE, Network meta-analysis, Osteoporosis, PTH-1 receptor agonists, Randomized controlled trials, Real-world evidence studies, Safety, Teriparatide

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 499729
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499729
ISSN: 0937-941X
PURE UUID: 448f5eac-6e3d-4705-9a4b-0d25dd1f74fe
ORCID for Nicholas C. Harvey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-2512

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Apr 2025 16:45
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 01:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Charlotte Beaudart
Author: Nicola Veronese
Author: Jonathan Douxfils
Author: Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan
Author: Francesco Bolzetta
Author: Paolo Albanese
Author: Gianpaolo Voltan
Author: Majed Alokail
Author: Nicholas R. Fuggle
Author: René Rizzoli
Author: Jean-Yves Reginster

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×