The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Intersection, interrelation or interdependence? The relationship between circular economy and nexus approach

Intersection, interrelation or interdependence? The relationship between circular economy and nexus approach
Intersection, interrelation or interdependence? The relationship between circular economy and nexus approach

Circular Economy (CE) and nexus thinking are increasingly considered as promising solutions for resource sustainability. While CE aims to design out waste through reducing, reusing, recycling and recovery of materials, the Nexus approach is interested to minimise waste and inefficiencies by focusing on the interlinkages between resources. Both concepts have been evolving separately with limited academic work to analyse their relationship. The aim of this systematic review, based on academic publications from 2004 to 2020, is to scrutinise the relationship between the circular economy and the nexus approach by adopting a mixed methods research design including bibliometric analysis and thematic synthesis. Our quantitative bibliometric analysis shows that, out of 7956 circular economy and 5795 nexus papers, academic documents explicitly mentioning both concepts account for less than 1% of each literature. Nonetheless, there is considerable overlap in most frequent words (50%–71%) as well as the most relevant sources (54%–56%) between both literatures. A detailed qualitative analysis of the documents relevant to both concepts also supports the existence of a close relationship between the two. From these analyses, we develop a new integrative conceptualization of the relationship between circular economy and the nexus approach. We conclude that there is good evidence for a three-tiered hierarchical relationship: ‘intersection’, ‘interrelation’ and ‘interdependence’, which we discuss in detail. Finally, emphasising the importance of an integrated approach, we propose a novel conceptual framework which combines circular economy and nexus approaches, which helps to operationalise nexus thinking on the one hand, and to converge the circular economy towards environmental sustainability on the other hand. As such, the framework addresses two known challenges of the concepts. However, whilst our integrated framework contributes to the conceptual development of both circular economy and the nexus approach, further research is required to highlight and facilitate their interrelation and interdependence in practice.

Bibliometric analysis, Circular economy, Food-energy-water nexus, Nexus thinking, Systematic review, Thematic analysis
0959-6526
Parsa, Ali
5eed1e45-c0c3-4071-9ffe-a6f9cab7b652
Van De Wiel, Marco J.
7b7c20fa-f86f-45dd-8d38-40480a16b1ac
Schmutz, Ulrich
ec9368cb-c428-4f51-b8dc-c782d692eb04
Parsa, Ali
5eed1e45-c0c3-4071-9ffe-a6f9cab7b652
Van De Wiel, Marco J.
7b7c20fa-f86f-45dd-8d38-40480a16b1ac
Schmutz, Ulrich
ec9368cb-c428-4f51-b8dc-c782d692eb04

Parsa, Ali, Van De Wiel, Marco J. and Schmutz, Ulrich (2021) Intersection, interrelation or interdependence? The relationship between circular economy and nexus approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, [127794]. (doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127794).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Circular Economy (CE) and nexus thinking are increasingly considered as promising solutions for resource sustainability. While CE aims to design out waste through reducing, reusing, recycling and recovery of materials, the Nexus approach is interested to minimise waste and inefficiencies by focusing on the interlinkages between resources. Both concepts have been evolving separately with limited academic work to analyse their relationship. The aim of this systematic review, based on academic publications from 2004 to 2020, is to scrutinise the relationship between the circular economy and the nexus approach by adopting a mixed methods research design including bibliometric analysis and thematic synthesis. Our quantitative bibliometric analysis shows that, out of 7956 circular economy and 5795 nexus papers, academic documents explicitly mentioning both concepts account for less than 1% of each literature. Nonetheless, there is considerable overlap in most frequent words (50%–71%) as well as the most relevant sources (54%–56%) between both literatures. A detailed qualitative analysis of the documents relevant to both concepts also supports the existence of a close relationship between the two. From these analyses, we develop a new integrative conceptualization of the relationship between circular economy and the nexus approach. We conclude that there is good evidence for a three-tiered hierarchical relationship: ‘intersection’, ‘interrelation’ and ‘interdependence’, which we discuss in detail. Finally, emphasising the importance of an integrated approach, we propose a novel conceptual framework which combines circular economy and nexus approaches, which helps to operationalise nexus thinking on the one hand, and to converge the circular economy towards environmental sustainability on the other hand. As such, the framework addresses two known challenges of the concepts. However, whilst our integrated framework contributes to the conceptual development of both circular economy and the nexus approach, further research is required to highlight and facilitate their interrelation and interdependence in practice.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 September 2021
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors
Keywords: Bibliometric analysis, Circular economy, Food-energy-water nexus, Nexus thinking, Systematic review, Thematic analysis

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 500261
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500261
ISSN: 0959-6526
PURE UUID: 382c6f7f-fd26-4bba-8b8f-630719b0ad6a
ORCID for Ali Parsa: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8658-8295

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Apr 2025 16:46
Last modified: 24 Apr 2025 02:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ali Parsa ORCID iD
Author: Marco J. Van De Wiel
Author: Ulrich Schmutz

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×