The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

(Post)neoliberalism

(Post)neoliberalism
(Post)neoliberalism

Neoliberalism is the view that public provision is best delivered through markets. It gained traction in Latin America in the 1980s, leveraged by international organisations and local economic and political elites in the context of weak democracies. Neoliberal policies in the region institutionalised a limited role for the state, accentuated private property rights and extended the commodification of the commons, accentuating inequalities of class, ethnicity, gender and place. The left in Latin America in the early years of this century attempted to renegotiate the state-market relationship, ‘re-nationalise’ large sections of the economy and extend programmes of welfare-based citizenship, in the context of a commodities boom. How successful was postneoliberal governance? Drawing on examples from across Central and South America, this chapter considers the extent to which it disrupted marketized models of development. Despite some successes in reasserting the value of a mixed economy and a (sometimes temporary) reduction in socio-economic inequalities, the voices and views of critical social movements and communities were often excluded from policy-making. Moreover, the record of all postneoliberal governments in relation to the management of the region’s rich natural resources was poor.

103-114
Routledge
Grugel, Jean
11807d62-c315-4527-a3dd-d5f135f2d307
Riggirozzi, Pía
ed3be4f8-37e7-46a2-8242-f6495d727c22
Halvorsen, Sam
Grugel, Jean
11807d62-c315-4527-a3dd-d5f135f2d307
Riggirozzi, Pía
ed3be4f8-37e7-46a2-8242-f6495d727c22
Halvorsen, Sam

Grugel, Jean and Riggirozzi, Pía (2025) (Post)neoliberalism. In, Halvorsen, Sam (ed.) Latin American Geographies. 1 ed. Routledge, pp. 103-114. (doi:10.4324/9781003430926-13).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Neoliberalism is the view that public provision is best delivered through markets. It gained traction in Latin America in the 1980s, leveraged by international organisations and local economic and political elites in the context of weak democracies. Neoliberal policies in the region institutionalised a limited role for the state, accentuated private property rights and extended the commodification of the commons, accentuating inequalities of class, ethnicity, gender and place. The left in Latin America in the early years of this century attempted to renegotiate the state-market relationship, ‘re-nationalise’ large sections of the economy and extend programmes of welfare-based citizenship, in the context of a commodities boom. How successful was postneoliberal governance? Drawing on examples from across Central and South America, this chapter considers the extent to which it disrupted marketized models of development. Despite some successes in reasserting the value of a mixed economy and a (sometimes temporary) reduction in socio-economic inequalities, the voices and views of critical social movements and communities were often excluded from policy-making. Moreover, the record of all postneoliberal governments in relation to the management of the region’s rich natural resources was poor.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 January 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 500377
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500377
PURE UUID: d7de0d93-4f23-4744-9014-609cbc848354
ORCID for Pía Riggirozzi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5809-890X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Apr 2025 16:47
Last modified: 29 Apr 2025 01:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jean Grugel
Author: Pía Riggirozzi ORCID iD
Editor: Sam Halvorsen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×