Let’s get a second opinion: international institutions and American public support for war
Let’s get a second opinion: international institutions and American public support for war
Recent scholarship on international institutions has begun to explore potentially powerful indirect pathways by which international institutions may influence states’ domestic politics and thereby influence the foreign policy preferences and strategies of state leaders. In this paper, we provide evidence documenting the indirect impact of institutional cues on public support for the use of force through an analysis of individual-level survey data and a survey-based experiment that examines support for a hypothetical American intervention in East Timor. We find that institutional endorsements increase support for the use of force among members of the American public who value the institution making the endorsement and among those who do not have confidence in the president. These individual-level analyses show that international institutions can affect domestic support for military action by serving providing a valuable “second opinion” on the proposed use of force.
563-583
Grieco, Joseph
2128abdd-c5fe-4b9d-9578-2bcb79a9759a
Gelpi, Christopher
10a55818-ec92-4567-83e4-33ea5f968690
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Feaver, Peter D.
bbe369a0-d7b0-4c58-8ab9-01468ffce1ff
7 June 2011
Grieco, Joseph
2128abdd-c5fe-4b9d-9578-2bcb79a9759a
Gelpi, Christopher
10a55818-ec92-4567-83e4-33ea5f968690
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Feaver, Peter D.
bbe369a0-d7b0-4c58-8ab9-01468ffce1ff
Grieco, Joseph, Gelpi, Christopher, Reifler, Jason and Feaver, Peter D.
(2011)
Let’s get a second opinion: international institutions and American public support for war.
International Studies Quarterly, 55 (2), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00660.x).
Abstract
Recent scholarship on international institutions has begun to explore potentially powerful indirect pathways by which international institutions may influence states’ domestic politics and thereby influence the foreign policy preferences and strategies of state leaders. In this paper, we provide evidence documenting the indirect impact of institutional cues on public support for the use of force through an analysis of individual-level survey data and a survey-based experiment that examines support for a hypothetical American intervention in East Timor. We find that institutional endorsements increase support for the use of force among members of the American public who value the institution making the endorsement and among those who do not have confidence in the president. These individual-level analyses show that international institutions can affect domestic support for military action by serving providing a valuable “second opinion” on the proposed use of force.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 7 June 2011
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 500462
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500462
ISSN: 0020-8833
PURE UUID: 9b0386e4-f0e3-40c3-a16f-0d6b50ae9593
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Apr 2025 16:55
Last modified: 09 Oct 2025 02:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Joseph Grieco
Author:
Christopher Gelpi
Author:
Jason Reifler
Author:
Peter D. Feaver
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics