The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impact of accurate initial discharge planning and in-patient transfers of care on discharge delays: a retrospective cohort study

Impact of accurate initial discharge planning and in-patient transfers of care on discharge delays: a retrospective cohort study
Impact of accurate initial discharge planning and in-patient transfers of care on discharge delays: a retrospective cohort study
Objective: to investigate the association between initial discharge planning and transfers of in-patient care with discharge delay. To identify operational changes which could expedite discharge within the Discharge to Assess (D2A) model.

Design: retrospective cohort study.

Setting: University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHSFT).

Participants: all adults (≥18 years) who registered a hospital spell in UHSFT between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022 (n = 258,051 spells). Individuals were followed from hospital admission through to discharge. Data includes demographics, comorbidities, operational information (ward changes, handovers) and discharge information (estimated discharge date, D2A pathway).

Main outcome measures: the primary outcome was discharge delay, defined as the number of days between the final estimated discharge date and the actual discharge date. Odds ratio analysis was used to assess the impact of initial discharge planning accuracy (D2A pathway), number of ward moves, and number of in-speciality handovers on the outcome, adjusting for demographic and patient complexity factors.

Results: out of 65,491 spells, 10,619 had an initial planned pathway that did not match the final discharge pathway, with 7,790 of these spells (75.1%) recording a discharge delay. Conversely, 10,216 of 54,872 spells (18.6%) where the initial pathway matched the final pathway recorded a discharge delay (adjusted odds ratio 2.72 (95% CI 2.55 – 2.91)). Ward moves and in-specialty handovers were also associated with increased likelihood of discharge delay, with adjusted odds ratio 1.25 (1.23 – 1.28) per ward move and 1.17 (1.14 – 1.20) per in-specialty handover.

Conclusions: this study finds a strong association between inaccurate initial discharge plans and in-patient transfers of care with discharge delay, after controlling for patient complexity and acuity. This highlights the need to consider how initial plans, and in-patient transfers affect discharge planning. Given the lead-times for organising onward care, operational inefficiencies are most impactful for patients eventually discharged on pathways with higher planning complexity.
medRxiv
Burns, Dan
40b9dc88-a54a-4365-b747-4456d9203146
Duckworth, Chris
992c216c-8f66-48a8-8de6-2f04b4f736e6
Fernandez, Carlos Lamas
e96b5deb-74d5-4c9b-a0ce-448c99526b09
Leyland, Rachael
f46e8bbd-1acb-460c-b2b1-5ecce1a16336
Wright, Mark
43325ef9-3459-4c75-b3bf-cf8d8dac2a21
Stammers, Matthew
a4ad3bd5-7323-4a6d-9c00-2c34f8ae5bd3
George, Michael
46c204d0-a94d-4d3c-8d84-40d632d9d75c
Boniface, Michael
f30bfd7d-20ed-451b-b405-34e3e22fdfba
Burns, Dan
40b9dc88-a54a-4365-b747-4456d9203146
Duckworth, Chris
992c216c-8f66-48a8-8de6-2f04b4f736e6
Fernandez, Carlos Lamas
e96b5deb-74d5-4c9b-a0ce-448c99526b09
Leyland, Rachael
f46e8bbd-1acb-460c-b2b1-5ecce1a16336
Wright, Mark
43325ef9-3459-4c75-b3bf-cf8d8dac2a21
Stammers, Matthew
a4ad3bd5-7323-4a6d-9c00-2c34f8ae5bd3
George, Michael
46c204d0-a94d-4d3c-8d84-40d632d9d75c
Boniface, Michael
f30bfd7d-20ed-451b-b405-34e3e22fdfba

Burns, Dan, Duckworth, Chris, Fernandez, Carlos Lamas, Leyland, Rachael, Wright, Mark, Stammers, Matthew, George, Michael and Boniface, Michael (2024) Impact of accurate initial discharge planning and in-patient transfers of care on discharge delays: a retrospective cohort study medRxiv 15pp. (doi:10.1101/2024.10.11.24315330). (Submitted)

Record type: Monograph (Working Paper)

Abstract

Objective: to investigate the association between initial discharge planning and transfers of in-patient care with discharge delay. To identify operational changes which could expedite discharge within the Discharge to Assess (D2A) model.

Design: retrospective cohort study.

Setting: University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHSFT).

Participants: all adults (≥18 years) who registered a hospital spell in UHSFT between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022 (n = 258,051 spells). Individuals were followed from hospital admission through to discharge. Data includes demographics, comorbidities, operational information (ward changes, handovers) and discharge information (estimated discharge date, D2A pathway).

Main outcome measures: the primary outcome was discharge delay, defined as the number of days between the final estimated discharge date and the actual discharge date. Odds ratio analysis was used to assess the impact of initial discharge planning accuracy (D2A pathway), number of ward moves, and number of in-speciality handovers on the outcome, adjusting for demographic and patient complexity factors.

Results: out of 65,491 spells, 10,619 had an initial planned pathway that did not match the final discharge pathway, with 7,790 of these spells (75.1%) recording a discharge delay. Conversely, 10,216 of 54,872 spells (18.6%) where the initial pathway matched the final pathway recorded a discharge delay (adjusted odds ratio 2.72 (95% CI 2.55 – 2.91)). Ward moves and in-specialty handovers were also associated with increased likelihood of discharge delay, with adjusted odds ratio 1.25 (1.23 – 1.28) per ward move and 1.17 (1.14 – 1.20) per in-specialty handover.

Conclusions: this study finds a strong association between inaccurate initial discharge plans and in-patient transfers of care with discharge delay, after controlling for patient complexity and acuity. This highlights the need to consider how initial plans, and in-patient transfers affect discharge planning. Given the lead-times for organising onward care, operational inefficiencies are most impactful for patients eventually discharged on pathways with higher planning complexity.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Submitted date: 12 October 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 500490
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500490
PURE UUID: 6207d7cc-0255-4d00-b458-e547a222ec59
ORCID for Dan Burns: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6976-1068
ORCID for Chris Duckworth: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0659-2177
ORCID for Carlos Lamas Fernandez: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-7619
ORCID for Matthew Stammers: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-3116
ORCID for Michael Boniface: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-6095

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 May 2025 17:02
Last modified: 02 May 2025 02:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Dan Burns ORCID iD
Author: Chris Duckworth ORCID iD
Author: Carlos Lamas Fernandez ORCID iD
Author: Rachael Leyland
Author: Mark Wright
Author: Matthew Stammers ORCID iD
Author: Michael George

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×