More accurate, but no less polarized: comparing the factual beliefs of government officials and the public
More accurate, but no less polarized: comparing the factual beliefs of government officials and the public
Studies of the American public demonstrate that partisans often diverge not only on questions of opinion but also on matters of fact. However, little is known about partisan divergence in factual beliefs among the government officials who make real policy decisions, or how it compares to belief polarization among the public. This letter describes the first systematic comparison of factual belief polarization between the public and government officials, which we conducted using a paired survey approach. The results indicate that political elites are consistently more accurately informed than the public across a wide range of politically contentious facts. However, this increase in accuracy does not translate into reduced factual belief polarization. These findings demonstrate that a more informed political elite does not necessarily mitigate partisan factual disagreement in policy making.
1315-1322
Lee, Nathan
cf2f0d00-27d5-42e2-8f36-56c1817fc092
Nyhan, Brendan
76e1ec80-0af5-432d-9dd6-f7e8237191e4
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Flynn, DJ
a5ba1541-23a8-4a58-8e62-d7c2ed67d6d7
1 July 2021
Lee, Nathan
cf2f0d00-27d5-42e2-8f36-56c1817fc092
Nyhan, Brendan
76e1ec80-0af5-432d-9dd6-f7e8237191e4
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Flynn, DJ
a5ba1541-23a8-4a58-8e62-d7c2ed67d6d7
Lee, Nathan, Nyhan, Brendan, Reifler, Jason and Flynn, DJ
(2021)
More accurate, but no less polarized: comparing the factual beliefs of government officials and the public.
British Journal of Political Science, 51 (3), .
(doi:10.1017/S000712342000037X).
Abstract
Studies of the American public demonstrate that partisans often diverge not only on questions of opinion but also on matters of fact. However, little is known about partisan divergence in factual beliefs among the government officials who make real policy decisions, or how it compares to belief polarization among the public. This letter describes the first systematic comparison of factual belief polarization between the public and government officials, which we conducted using a paired survey approach. The results indicate that political elites are consistently more accurately informed than the public across a wide range of politically contentious facts. However, this increase in accuracy does not translate into reduced factual belief polarization. These findings demonstrate that a more informed political elite does not necessarily mitigate partisan factual disagreement in policy making.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 July 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 500593
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500593
ISSN: 0007-1234
PURE UUID: f38a7e7f-ffbe-4737-9389-3ab7e8beba51
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 May 2025 16:58
Last modified: 24 Jun 2025 02:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nathan Lee
Author:
Brendan Nyhan
Author:
Jason Reifler
Author:
DJ Flynn
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics