Alternative measures of political efficacy: the quest for cross-cultural invariance with ordinally scaled survey items
Alternative measures of political efficacy: the quest for cross-cultural invariance with ordinally scaled survey items
In this paper, we examine the measurement of citizens’ beliefs that politicians and political systems are responsive (external efficacy) and that citizens see themselves sufficiently skilled to participate in politics (internal efficacy). This paper demonstrates techniques that allow researchers to establish the cross-context validity of conceptually important ordinal scales. In so doing, we show an alternative set of efficacy indicators to those commonly appearing on cross-national surveys to be more promising from a validity standpoint. Through detailed discussion and application of multi-group analysis for ordinal measures, we demonstrate that a measurement model linking latent internal and external efficacy factors performs well in configural and parameter invariance testing when applied to representative samples of respondents in the United States and Great Britain. With near full invariance achieved, differences in latent variable means are meaningful and British respondents are shown to have lower levels of both forms of efficacy than their American counterparts. We argue that this technique may be particularly valuable for scholars who wish to establish the suitability of ordinal scales for direct comparison across nations or cultures.
Scotto, Thomas J.
46d397ec-85ac-4a35-9020-552f4b493a77
Xena, Carla
bc989256-f066-47b2-8d2d-0e8c71ee8221
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
16 July 2021
Scotto, Thomas J.
46d397ec-85ac-4a35-9020-552f4b493a77
Xena, Carla
bc989256-f066-47b2-8d2d-0e8c71ee8221
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Scotto, Thomas J., Xena, Carla and Reifler, Jason
(2021)
Alternative measures of political efficacy: the quest for cross-cultural invariance with ordinally scaled survey items.
Frontiers in Political Science, 3, [665532].
(doi:10.3389/fpos.2021.665532).
Abstract
In this paper, we examine the measurement of citizens’ beliefs that politicians and political systems are responsive (external efficacy) and that citizens see themselves sufficiently skilled to participate in politics (internal efficacy). This paper demonstrates techniques that allow researchers to establish the cross-context validity of conceptually important ordinal scales. In so doing, we show an alternative set of efficacy indicators to those commonly appearing on cross-national surveys to be more promising from a validity standpoint. Through detailed discussion and application of multi-group analysis for ordinal measures, we demonstrate that a measurement model linking latent internal and external efficacy factors performs well in configural and parameter invariance testing when applied to representative samples of respondents in the United States and Great Britain. With near full invariance achieved, differences in latent variable means are meaningful and British respondents are shown to have lower levels of both forms of efficacy than their American counterparts. We argue that this technique may be particularly valuable for scholars who wish to establish the suitability of ordinal scales for direct comparison across nations or cultures.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 16 July 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 500597
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500597
ISSN: 2673-3145
PURE UUID: a4581848-6ee5-4fdd-98ea-619ed9c9003c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 May 2025 16:59
Last modified: 07 May 2025 02:13
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Thomas J. Scotto
Author:
Carla Xena
Author:
Jason Reifler
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics