The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Self-affirmation and identity-driven political behavior

Self-affirmation and identity-driven political behavior
Self-affirmation and identity-driven political behavior
Psychological attachment to political parties can bias people’s attitudes, beliefs, and group evaluations. Studies from psychology suggest that self-affirmation theory may ameliorate this problem in the domain of politics on a variety of outcome measures. We report a series of studies conducted by separate research teams that examine whether a self-affirmation intervention affects a variety of outcomes, including political or policy attitudes, factual beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, affective polarization, and evaluations of news sources. The different research teams use a variety of self-affirmation interventions, research designs, and outcomes. Despite these differences, the research teams consistently find that self-affirmation treatments have little effect. These findings suggest considerable caution is warranted for researchers who wish to apply the self-affirmation framework to studies that investigate political attitudes and beliefs. By presenting the “null results” of separate research teams, we hope to spark a discussion about whether and how the self-affirmation paradigm should be applied to political topics.
2052-2630
225-240
Lyons, Benjamin
562d35bb-6be0-4e08-8663-0cc28bfa0063
Farhart, Christina E
7aca102f-2bcc-4394-bc6c-5a7eeff19bf1
Hall, Michael P
260a0f0e-5f34-4f73-af52-edcf7bb1a2fb
Kotcher, John
26ba5169-d668-4312-9747-7802c5209903
Levendusky, Matthew
bb5db1ca-a0e7-4102-b112-9a49fa1ae12e
Miller, Joanne
e8591777-5b8b-446d-99f4-6c9b2dc0a894
Nyhan, Brendan
76e1ec80-0af5-432d-9dd6-f7e8237191e4
Raimi, Kaitlin
83772385-58dd-4160-baab-709901307ce0
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Saunders, Kyle
c4d1787a-5fc4-4a76-bc9e-2c51c5324a12
Skytte, Rasmus
bf825f05-45f0-4688-9274-af7e3151b94f
Zhao, Xiaoquan
2f233e60-aa05-4a69-b375-bc8479d75f1e
Lyons, Benjamin
562d35bb-6be0-4e08-8663-0cc28bfa0063
Farhart, Christina E
7aca102f-2bcc-4394-bc6c-5a7eeff19bf1
Hall, Michael P
260a0f0e-5f34-4f73-af52-edcf7bb1a2fb
Kotcher, John
26ba5169-d668-4312-9747-7802c5209903
Levendusky, Matthew
bb5db1ca-a0e7-4102-b112-9a49fa1ae12e
Miller, Joanne
e8591777-5b8b-446d-99f4-6c9b2dc0a894
Nyhan, Brendan
76e1ec80-0af5-432d-9dd6-f7e8237191e4
Raimi, Kaitlin
83772385-58dd-4160-baab-709901307ce0
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Saunders, Kyle
c4d1787a-5fc4-4a76-bc9e-2c51c5324a12
Skytte, Rasmus
bf825f05-45f0-4688-9274-af7e3151b94f
Zhao, Xiaoquan
2f233e60-aa05-4a69-b375-bc8479d75f1e

Lyons, Benjamin, Farhart, Christina E, Hall, Michael P, Kotcher, John, Levendusky, Matthew, Miller, Joanne, Nyhan, Brendan, Raimi, Kaitlin, Reifler, Jason, Saunders, Kyle, Skytte, Rasmus and Zhao, Xiaoquan (2021) Self-affirmation and identity-driven political behavior. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9 (2), 225-240. (doi:10.1017/XPS.2020.46).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Psychological attachment to political parties can bias people’s attitudes, beliefs, and group evaluations. Studies from psychology suggest that self-affirmation theory may ameliorate this problem in the domain of politics on a variety of outcome measures. We report a series of studies conducted by separate research teams that examine whether a self-affirmation intervention affects a variety of outcomes, including political or policy attitudes, factual beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, affective polarization, and evaluations of news sources. The different research teams use a variety of self-affirmation interventions, research designs, and outcomes. Despite these differences, the research teams consistently find that self-affirmation treatments have little effect. These findings suggest considerable caution is warranted for researchers who wish to apply the self-affirmation framework to studies that investigate political attitudes and beliefs. By presenting the “null results” of separate research teams, we hope to spark a discussion about whether and how the self-affirmation paradigm should be applied to political topics.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 8 February 2021
Published date: 8 February 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 500603
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500603
ISSN: 2052-2630
PURE UUID: 706e0c53-eabd-4a54-b382-96a6f0212fd7
ORCID for Jason Reifler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-7346

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 May 2025 17:01
Last modified: 16 Oct 2025 02:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Benjamin Lyons
Author: Christina E Farhart
Author: Michael P Hall
Author: John Kotcher
Author: Matthew Levendusky
Author: Joanne Miller
Author: Brendan Nyhan
Author: Kaitlin Raimi
Author: Jason Reifler ORCID iD
Author: Kyle Saunders
Author: Rasmus Skytte
Author: Xiaoquan Zhao

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×