The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Structural hypocrisy in humanitarian aid: a justice-oriented counter-story of how donors fund both relief and destruction in Gaza

Structural hypocrisy in humanitarian aid: a justice-oriented counter-story of how donors fund both relief and destruction in Gaza
Structural hypocrisy in humanitarian aid: a justice-oriented counter-story of how donors fund both relief and destruction in Gaza
Background: the latest military assault on Gaza by Israel, which began after 7 October 2023, has led to an unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe, with tens of thousands killed, nearly two million displaced, and famine officially declared in 2024. The near-total siege cut off food, water, electricity, and medical supplies, while relentless bombardments destroyed critical infrastructure, rendering Gaza unliveable. Many donor nations have simultaneously provided humanitarian aid to Gaza while supplying military assistance to Israel, underscoring the structural hypocrisy in international responses to the catastrophe in Gaza.

Methods: in this article, we introduce and develop the concept of justice-oriented counter-stories (JOCS) to critically examine how quantitative datasets on humanitarian aid flows can distort reality and obscure key disparities. Using aid to Gaza in 2023–2024 as a case study, we apply JOCS to identify biases in official reporting and make statistical adjustments to offer an alternative perspective.

Results: our justice-oriented analytical lens shows how the countries humanitarian aid rankings shift significantly when we factor in donor nations’ GDP, and the structural hypocrisy of offering humanitarian aid while simultaneously providing significant military assistance to Israel. Our paper also identifies some of the key methodological challenges in making such adjustments.

Conclusion: we conclude by emphasising the broader implications of “justice-oriented counter-stories” for understanding not only aid flows, but social justice and the representation of social and environmental issues.
SocArXiv
Espejo, Irene Ruiz
bf12dd5b-9110-4791-967e-b4298d3cc580
Bastable, Emily
40b2ebb5-4636-41cb-b9de-c588bc56c44e
Boxall, Jessica
c8fac297-e666-481f-8bb1-41ab2cbccd3d
Jacob, Chandni
f72c15ac-ef6b-4144-95b3-31194541fe00
Norton, Frankie
8320592f-858d-4d46-8663-3c509c05202b
Pathak, Pathik
29d3480f-191e-4caf-8cf6-3d3836ec39c5
Espejo, Irene Ruiz
bf12dd5b-9110-4791-967e-b4298d3cc580
Bastable, Emily
40b2ebb5-4636-41cb-b9de-c588bc56c44e
Boxall, Jessica
c8fac297-e666-481f-8bb1-41ab2cbccd3d
Jacob, Chandni
f72c15ac-ef6b-4144-95b3-31194541fe00
Norton, Frankie
8320592f-858d-4d46-8663-3c509c05202b
Pathak, Pathik
29d3480f-191e-4caf-8cf6-3d3836ec39c5

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Background: the latest military assault on Gaza by Israel, which began after 7 October 2023, has led to an unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe, with tens of thousands killed, nearly two million displaced, and famine officially declared in 2024. The near-total siege cut off food, water, electricity, and medical supplies, while relentless bombardments destroyed critical infrastructure, rendering Gaza unliveable. Many donor nations have simultaneously provided humanitarian aid to Gaza while supplying military assistance to Israel, underscoring the structural hypocrisy in international responses to the catastrophe in Gaza.

Methods: in this article, we introduce and develop the concept of justice-oriented counter-stories (JOCS) to critically examine how quantitative datasets on humanitarian aid flows can distort reality and obscure key disparities. Using aid to Gaza in 2023–2024 as a case study, we apply JOCS to identify biases in official reporting and make statistical adjustments to offer an alternative perspective.

Results: our justice-oriented analytical lens shows how the countries humanitarian aid rankings shift significantly when we factor in donor nations’ GDP, and the structural hypocrisy of offering humanitarian aid while simultaneously providing significant military assistance to Israel. Our paper also identifies some of the key methodological challenges in making such adjustments.

Conclusion: we conclude by emphasising the broader implications of “justice-oriented counter-stories” for understanding not only aid flows, but social justice and the representation of social and environmental issues.

Text
JOCS Article UPDATED 11-02-2025 - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (606kB)

More information

Published date: 26 March 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 500632
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500632
PURE UUID: 283d3e29-391b-485b-9c08-910dd4737370
ORCID for Emily Bastable: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0006-5705-6875
ORCID for Jessica Boxall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0009-1912-0380
ORCID for Chandni Jacob: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2024-0074

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 May 2025 16:41
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Irene Ruiz Espejo
Author: Emily Bastable ORCID iD
Author: Jessica Boxall ORCID iD
Author: Chandni Jacob ORCID iD
Author: Frankie Norton
Author: Pathik Pathak

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×